I want you describe the person who made this banner down the the nuances of their appearance and personality
So I'm thinkingThe 4chan person is gay and the other guy is saying "I wouldn't get your hopes up" because of thatAm I reading this correctly?Is 4chan gay
>>539101378The lovestruck female in the image is actually a penis verified mtf. That's why "she" has no hope to up
>>539101441hmAre we sure 4chan isn't gay?
>>539101350
>>539102923lol
i am a well put together and adjusted individualthat's why i am herehttps://youtu.be/MoLSQPtyLWE?si=kqFgkE9ZvNj1HDIN
Banners are blockedSame as adsYou do know its just a fucking mix of html and css that can be totally customized on the clients end
>>539105028Yes I saw you posting Hercules fighting death
>>539101350Anyone seen the banner/ad for the weird crisis helpline? Seems sus as fuck.
>>539106794No haven't seen that one
>>539106851I don't have a screenshot of the ad since I use ublock, but there was an /x/ thread on it a while ago. It links to this>https://rejecttheragebait.com/It was also linked to another company. Weird glowfag themes imo. Probably for getting patsys or for harvesting insurance data
>drew up a banner after the last banner contest years ago>admins stopped doing themFuck this gay website
>>539106957herehttps://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/42506155/
>>539101350>I wouldn't get _your_ hopes upWhat kind of illiterate moron is behind this? It's "I wouldn't get _my_ hopes up". You are proposing something hypothetical.
>>539101350It's pretty obvious. /pol/ is the Cathedral Of Misogyny. And damn proud of it.
>>539101350this is an old webcomic that /mu/ used to make fun of, i forget the name of it thoughthe guy on the right was the author’s self-insert that acted lick a fucking lamer and had shit taste in music
>>539106794Yeah there's one for Canadian IPs that links to a fed tax payer funded operation that has a live chat. Literal glownig honeypot.
>>539107038Anime chatbot misinterpreted the image
>>539107167found a classic strip in my old ass /mu/ folder
>>539107212Idiot. The first man in the picture is proposing a hypothetical scenario whereby he links events in the scene to the hopes of the other man. He is informing him that were he him, he would not raise his hopes, meaning the correct way would be for him to say to him: "I wouldn't get _my_ hopes up [if I were you]". I don't know if that makes it clearer for someone with an IQ below 100.
>>539107167>>539107319Three Chord Dorks
>>539107415that’s the one. everything but his old tumblr is wiped lmao
>>539107396>generic frog poster >wall of gibberish bot confirmed
