>Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) opposed the [KIDS act] legislation. She criticized the bill as "using kids as a smokescreen" to push Big Tech lobbyists' agendas, warning that it enables dangerous surveillance and lacks necessary privacy protections.
>>539105674So you want to lose anonymity online but agree with rightoid Maga handling of the Epstein files. Shalom.
>>539105902I’m a fascist. I don’t believe in liberal shit like much free speech or privacy. I believe in one unified, militarized nation
>>539106112>what? I wouldn’t actually serve in the military though, I would just be like the leader or whateveryou’re a fucking faggot
>>539106347> what is a commission >what are tech sector commissions
>>539105674Of course she does, she is a jew.
>>539106112>I don’t believe in liberal shit like much free speech or privacy. I believe in one unified, militarized nationWhat you are is a jewish child raping pedophile piece of shit. Only child rapists and other criminals like drug traffickers and human traffickers (all jew crime rings) are the ones yelling the loudest about muh law, muh police and a "militarized state." We don't need a militarized state what we need is jews in ovens.
>>539105674She is correct
>>539105674>mu-huh protect kidsThey don't care about kidsIf you want to protect them, arrest the rothschild epstein clan
>>539106112Bit tech ARE the pedos and they want to control access to your kids.
>>539105674Even a broken clock is right twice a day.Would have been good if they had remembered that when they were the ones combatting anonymity over "hate speech".Niggers.
>>539105674Did she defend jews?
>>539106766It she Venom?
>>539106112I will kill you if I'm ever in the same room as you
>>539105674>>539106112>>539106609I know you're baiting, but still, please kill yourselves.
>>539106969You’re a tranny so that is a plausible threat however statistically you are a thousand times more likely to kill yourself
>>539105674>. She criticized the bill as "using kids as a smokescreen" to push Big Tech lobbyists' agendas, warning that it enables dangerous surveillance and lacks necessary privacyAnd she's 100% correct
>>539107389>i hate trannies>i love big tech, who have been pushing trannies all alongSo.. this is is all just bait, makes sense.
>>539107458You are 100% brown
>>539105902You lost Trannie
>>539105674>AOC defends the rights of pedophiles, child predatorsThank you AOC. We child lovers of /pol/ thank you.
>>539105674Socialists are correct about everything.
>>539105674>KIDS actYou can tell it's pro kids because it's in the name! Hurrrr durrrr!
>>539107389>everyone i don't like is a faggot trannyI mean that's not true, but it IS true that your faggot nigger-brained golem kids will be troons.
>>539105674>dangerous surveillance Mexicans are dangerous
>>539105674You are a faggot retard JIDF poster, get nuked. Americans don't want you scummy mandatory spyware on every digital medium. Get assblasted by a nuke.
>>539109390What are Americans lol"We don't want you seeing us rape our sisters or suck off the dog"You mutts are a disgusting degenerate cess pit of freaks. You brought this surveillance on yourself by being so brown and stupid
She's aging like fine wine innit. MAGA roasties BTFO.>>539106112ok zoomie
>>539105674What a plot twist, /Pol/ defending the policies of the Epstein class while the democrats who were supposed to be engaging in satanic spirit cooking are the ones defending what remains of America.Daily reminder that /Pol/ was created by Epstein. While her wife was busy on Reddit.
>>539109774DudeOne thing is not everything
>>539105674Is she into shotas?
>>539106112You would be digging latrines
>>539105674Politics is so relentlessly dishonest, it's incredible. The KIDS act does, in fact, simply advance lobbyists' agendas. Think about it for a second. It requires age verification, which means fucking 4CHAN would require it. Do you fucking REALLY want to be socially accountable for the shit you post here?
>>539105674LOL the act is literally called KIDS can you get anymore blatant with this "think of the children" bullshit? Oh no a child is crying better get rid of all our rights
>>539110028I’m not a liberal, I am a fascist and the liberal ideas of individualism and privacy are meant to foster degeneracy
>>539111596What's your name and address?
>>539111596>>539111659Come on, now. Be a true fascist and fully reject the "liberal ideas of individualism and privacy," which are meant to "foster degeneracy." Put your money where your mouth is. Tell us your name, your address. Make sure you post a picture of yourself with a timestamp in front of your house, as well.
>>539111596>>539111659>>539112100Huh. No response. It looks like maybe you're representing your position dishonestly, because it certainly seems like you're unwilling to provide the LITERAL EXACT THING the fucking KIDS act would facilitate here.
>>539112664I will disclose mine when everyone else has to. Not to a bunch of anonymous leftists
>>539112902Looks like you want to foster degeneracy to me. Let's be real, you're absolutely fuckin steeped in it anyway, aren't you? The amount of CP you have saved on your computer is probably enough to send you to prison for life, isn't it?
>KIDS act>Whats this (European)>Look it up>KIDS would mandate age verification for accessing mature content, require services to implement rigorous controls for accounts belonging to minors, and other similar stepsIn other words everybody in the US will be forced to be age authetificate. In other words the Internet you have will know who you are, what you do, how old you are etc.In other words survaillanc and lose of privacyYet OP frames it as "pro pedophile" to oppose thisAOC is, de facto, more libertarian in her stance than every sinmgle republican and cares more about your freedom than every republican
>>539106112You wouldn't be cut out for that type of a society.
>open thread>no one is buying it
>>539106480>>539106112Lmao you're literally the "I would be a party official" guy
