I voted for this3rd circuit court rules NJ's AWB and mag ban Unconstitutionalhttps://www.reuters.com/world/us-appeals-court-declares-new-jerseys-ban-assault-rifles-unconstitutional-2026-07-17/
>>539125815until the court rules that ALL military arms are protected by the second amendment, they're still fake and gay
>>539126480This, all true Americans should be able to carry a Davy Crockett nuclear mortar system for self defense purposes. This is not a joke, the nigger question demands a bigger solution.
>>539126480>the court rules thatNFA 1934 needs to be overturned-removed by vote of United States Congress. In other words legislated / made lawSupreme Court can't accomplish that, solely alone by itself with 1 ruling.
>>539126662if standing armies were abolished, niggers wouldn't even be an issue anymore, but as soon as someone said defund the police, you faggots acted like they were communists.
>>539125815NJ is such a corrupt shithole they'll just ignore it like they did with concealed carry.
>>539125815Based, it's created a circuit split.Which means the suprememe court will get to make a decision soon.Liberal gun grabbers are about to get their ass handed to themselves. >impose insane amounts of gun control in select states>end up getting guns even less regulated KEK, democrats are retarded
>>539125815Apparently in NJ, as part of the background check to buy a gun you need to list references they can talk to… like what do people who don’t have references do, are they just not allowed to enjoy the 2nd amendment ?
>>539127461I would just put politicians names on that lolmaybe that would annoy them enough to remove that bullshit.
>>539125815>>539127160>Based, it's created a circuit splitThis.It's a big win, and yes the U.S. Supreme Court has two key 2A cases soon to be ruled on.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1ROQxtApe0
>>539127160>>539128133>Based, it's created a circuit split.>Which means the suprememe court will get to make a decision soon.unironically this happened like 2 weeks after the scouts already said they would take 2 AWB cases. they took the chicago and connecut banshttps://www.scotusblog.com/2026/06/court-grants-several-new-cases-including-on-whether-the-second-amendment-protects-possession-of-/
>>539127461>>539127555they just send that person an email, used to be a letter they had to fill out. it's like>I've known _________ for ___ years>__________is or isn't a habitual drunkard>__________ does or doesn't use narcotics>__________ does or doesn't beat his or her spouse hopefully they get rid of that, but that's literally all they ask, it's just a form letter
>>539125815>>539126480>>539126662nice try kikes. not reading your fake slop even if it was for free. KYS
>>539128289get raped
>>539126834>congressthe second amendment enforces itself, cuck
>>539128336>3 pbtid pledditard 25-IQ derpDumb Fuck, the U.S. Supreme Court can't 'rule' the NFA out of existence. Three branches of government.This is about state laws, specific locales/states that have unconstitutional regulations. NFA remains federal law until Congress overturns it. (You) are free to behave as you wish but a hundred-year-old federal law remains in effect; enjoy
>>539128557>the U.S. Supreme Court can't 'rule' the NFA out of existence.they literally can. they literally had a kangaroo court case over this, Miller, where the pro gun side didn't show up because the dems set it up so it was a pair of gangsters who were supposed to be the pro gun side and they jumped bailactually the NFA has been ruled unconstitutional in hayes or hanes or something in the 1960s where they said the registration requirement violates the 5th amendment so if you are prohibited from owning a gun you are legally exempt from the registration requirement of the NFA per some amendment congress made to the law in the 1960s
Great thing about this Cheeseman v. New Jersey ruling is the 3rd Circuit federal court has codified *common use* and *Step 2 of the Bruen method* (burden of proof is on the government), and is a hard kneecap to the gungrabber 'dangerous and unusual' pilpul(Trump's appointees to the 3rd Circuit also helped obtain this ruling)
>>539128944 OP 5 pbtid>literally ×2Wrong. ('registration') Haynes v. United States (1968) was simultaneous with the GCA same year, about self-incrimination of a felon. None of that has anything to do with removing or """"ruling unconstitutional"""" the 1934 NFA Act Of Congress.
>>539129672holy shit you are gay and retarded. you must be a butthurt belter on a vpnhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haynes_v._United_Stateshaynes was about the NFA. It was ruled on in Jan of 1968 and the GCA was passed in october 1968. how the fuck would it be a ruling on a law that wasn't passed yet?miller was also about the constitutionality of the NFAhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Millerthe scotus can strike down federal laws, retard. they do it all the time
>>539129892>derpI *told* (You) it was related to the NFA brainlet not only that I informed you of the case in the first place so you could tard-google it and post it hereRE: Miller, that wasn't going to 'overturn' the NFA, which isn't 'a law' (1 law) it's a fucking *ACT OF CONGRESS*. Dumb *FUCK*. (You) are fucking stupid. (What do you expect from an OP posting dancing trump pic)
>muh GCA oct 68Holy fucking fuck what a *DUMB FUCK*.The GCA was *signed* into law 22 October 1968 by the president, but it was originally proposed five years prior after the JFK assassination about mail-order firearms; it had been most recently introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives in January 1967. The 1968 assassinations of MLK and RFK gave final impetus to bring a passing vote.
