I got a few, honestly I would say treaty of versailles and treaty of sevres but the worst one of them I would say is treaty of trianon.
bvmp
>I would say is treaty of trianon
>>539130032Brest litovsk and Versailles. WW1 proved that humiliating your enemies when they surrender will only make them rise again dager in hand Except Austro-Hungary, that abominations got everything it deserved
>>539130032Brest-Litovsk comes to mind. The Soviets gave up control of all former territories of the Russian Empire in Europe west of the Russian border. Sure they took back most of Ukraine and some of Belarus over the next couple years, but they still lost a huge amount of territory.
>>539130335>VersaillesIt was fair, just not enforced properly.
>>539130372For Russia starting the war it was absolutely fair but was sadly not enforced properly
>>539130213
>>539130335>>539130398And they could have humiliated them even more so they could seethe but would be weak to rise again.But yeah it was pretty fair, the Germans didn't even attempt to pretend to pay reparations and the Allies ignored nearly every violation
>>539130032Maybe dont lose a world war and be occupied.
>>539134238Morgenthau plan should have been enforced instead. It was a fair solution to the German question.
>>539130032Ethnic map for comparison. This exact map was brought to the treaty conference but was rejected because the Entente never cared to draw borders around ethnic boundaries.
>>539130032these nationalities should had been sudetenlanded after 1918. but no, we had a likeral faggot kike government in 1918 november who gave up territories without a fight and disbanded the battle hardened army retreating from the Italian front and Ukraine. so sad anyway
>>539135590
>>539135196I prefer Operation Unthinkable. The Warsaw Pact was always going to collapse so you might've just wrapped up the Cold War in one go.
>>539135590That map was rejected because it was a big pile of shit overestimating ethnic Hungarians
>>539130032The treaty of Osimo.Yes I'm biased
