[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: adg.jpg (552 KB, 1288x1600)
552 KB JPG
Why aren't Turks more into wewuzzing with Byzantine shit? Are they stupid? It's right there at their fingertips.
>>
>>539218517
They spent centuries pretending they were Rome after sacking Constantinople with no one even humoring it and they still ban DNA tests to this day since half their country are Greeks.
>>
>>539218517
Because their official ethnogenesis is based on the zoophiliac half-chink/half-caucasian turk steppe raiders that destroyed the eastern european empire for good
>>
>>539218517
My guesses are:
>Because Greeks are already wewuzzing about it
>Because it took them a few centuries and they were clearly enemies during that time, you don't see Spain wewuzzing as Arabs either
>Because pan-turkism is more useful to Turkey than endless slapfights with Greece
>>
>>539218517
It would require them to acknowledge that byzantine culture and society was superior.
>>
>>539218831
Kek.
>>
>>539218517
We wuz khans is good enough.
How the film, anyhow?
>>
>>539218906
His worst.
>>
>>539219044
>His worst.
Oof. That bad, huh?
>>
because they're wewuzzing as Turks. Turks are originally an Asian people from western Mongolia.
The Oghuz Turks that modern Turkey is descended from diluted their Asian genes out of existence by breeding with Iranians, Caucasians, Anatolians and Greeks.
>>
Turks arent insecure
>>
>>539218517
Because they identify as the conquerors who conquered all of that and had a massive empire raping YTs for hundreds of years? Why would they identify with some losers
>>
Muslim shitholes hate the cultures that they sublanted with a passion.

Its why always destroy or willingly handover ancient relics to museums then cry about it bei g thiers when it becomes a huge revenue stream for museums.
>admiral ackbar this. Praise Alan that
> ayo Y-tee. That 2000 year old jar bel ok gs to us, no we didn't care about it before because it's haram but it's making money so now we want it back.
>>
File: 1762639069546479.jpg (115 KB, 736x981)
115 KB JPG
>>539218517
>Fingertips?
Because it predates their horse sweat diety and noncey prophet and exposes the facade of Islamic 'cultural' history
>>
turks are muslim. did you forget that? why would muslims embrace orthodox's? turks erased christanity off anatolia. remmeber? turkey is not different than isis.
>>
>>539218517
>>539219608
As this guy said they are not insecure like others is not called turkey for no reason the turkish genes may be diluted but they are present, its easier go undersfand the mindeset if you compare go the 1 drop rule, 1 turkish ancestor in anatolians or greeks ->still a turk and they are muslim, if they were christian maybe they would larp as byzantines, and if they were it would probably be accepted as romans aswell
>>539218906
Where can I watch it?
>>
>>539218517
>>539218906
unironically Byzantium/Rome are overacted. they're like the british empire or the cheeseburger of hamburgers.
if anything turks would be more proud larping as Mongols considering the influence they had on developing the ottoman administration system trade networks and military doctrine
>>
>>539222794
overrated*
>>
>>539218517
>Why aren't whites more into wewuzzing with Bantu shit?
The answer is the same: their culture is superior so why bother wewuzzing some inferior culture?
>>
>>539222794
They're "overrated" in the sense that life in Rome sucked for the average person and the barbarians were better off in their communities, it's not overrated in the terms of impact on Europe and the entire world, in fact average person would probably understate it.
You don't have to be a contrarian to everything.
>>
>>539219803
"They" had massive caliphate in the same style that Romans in Rome "had" a massive empire. They were globohomo meshes of everything and anything, initially natives had some influence but over time natives were tangential in "their" own empire.
>>
Muslims like old-time Christians consider the old pagan empires to have been destroyed by god so it's impious to take too much interest in them.
Modern archaeology only became possible when Europeans stopped taking their religion seriously.
>>
>>539223241
Tbh, pagans did not take too much interests in their pagan ancestors (in the sense that they'd go and excavate sites). As far as I know.
>>
>>539218831
Fourth post may be equal to the besy post
>>
>>539219608
LOL
>pwetty pwease pwetend we are europeans
>but we are tho
>>
Turks are so mixed that they have the right to claim "we wuz everything"
>>
>>539218640
>since half their country are Greeks.

5% at most have traces of Greek DNA, less than 1% majority Greek, many groups of Balkans flooded into Ottoman Empire, the most numerous were Albobanians



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.