[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1553026599147.jpg (112 KB, 1280x720)
112 KB JPG
Capitalism isn't perfect but it's the only system that efficiently generates wealth and growth. The main problem with capitalism is that not everyone owns capital even though everyone wants to.
>>
>>539250398
Is the capitalism in the room with you now?
>>
>>539250398
That's republicanism you dumb cunt. Republicanism gives people social and economic mobility. People have had capitalism under monarchy and never progressed.
>>
The word capitalism doesn't exist outside of marxist religious dogma. A free market doesnt need an -ism.
Capitalism is just the pejorative used by a poor socialist against a perceived rich socialist. The latter was just able to socialize his risks and costs through a central planning committee onto somebody else while the former wishes he could have done the same.

Both are structurally and cognitively the same, and every socialist, no matter how he calls himself and others, no matter if rich, poor, or middle, young or old deserves only one thing; death
>>
The point of capitalism isn't wealth or growth it's freedom. A capitalist society is entirely compatible with technological backwardness and poverty as long as the people prefer it that way
>>
>>539250643
>using marxist poisoned terminology
a free market doesn't require an -ism that lends legitimity to any central planning committee socializing risks and costs
>>
>>539250635
>>539251027
The term "capitalism" does not mean "free market" and never has. It means a system where economic activity is driven by capital, meaning stored-up wealth (currency, materials, means of production, etc), and controlled by capitalists, those who own that wealth. It reflects Marx's day in that his opposition thought that all economic activity originates in capital. Marx opposed this and said economic activity originates in labor.

They are both wrong. Economic activity originates from land.
>>
>>539250398
it is not a problem it's a feature
aspiring capitalists need to have the motivation
>>
>>539251287
>implying that there is a universal objective term "wealth"
>Realizing that Marx and the Manchester fags were retards that tried to define a universal that does not exist
>Claim that there is still a universal term "wealth"
You are as stupid as the marxist, Machesters and every other retard in the tradition of Plato and Aristoteles
>>
File: 1772395897810948.jpg (94 KB, 1000x886)
94 KB JPG
>>539250398
The main problem with capitalism in the US is that oligarchs have bought the government.
>>
It's all fun and games until the earth runs out of resources
>>
>>539252055
what resources?
>>
>>539250493
fpbp
>>
>>539250398

Jewish Capitalism doesn't work, especially with idiot NPCs as masses Anon

Capitalism with Nationalism makes sense otherwise if you coexist with fucking idiots that think Jamal Smiffs shit stained nigger sports ball sneakers and Piggerstein's government boots are worth more than whatever one tries to give then it's all pointless and Jewish, Anon
>>
File: EZ1zyBhXQAESpmm.jpg (70 KB, 644x680)
70 KB JPG
>>539251996
yeah.
those dang rich "capitalists"...
>>
File: blimey.jpg (126 KB, 909x511)
126 KB JPG
>>539250398
>>539250643
>>539251287
>land
>labor
>ownership
>>
File: thonks.jpg (13 KB, 360x360)
13 KB JPG
>>539251996
America has land, labor, and ownership. A potential problem is money in politics, although it basically comes down to political factions and coalitions
>>
>>539254785
>land
in the current era a liability. Immobile, illiquid and easily exitortable by central planning committees and mercenaries
>Labor
Regular? Worthless. Easily extortable by central planning committees and mercenaries
>ownership
any more ambiguous terms?
>>
>>539250398
IQ matters more than what system you subscribe to
>>
File: Central banks.jpg (247 KB, 1035x713)
247 KB JPG
>>539250398

We don't have capitalism; we have corporatism. No such thing as "too big to fail" in capitalism.
>https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UGL-Ex1CD1c



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.