Poltards btfo! Private property rights are phony bullshit.
>>539251577Most of what we take for granted in civilization is ultimately just made up rules the majority have agreed to adhere to. Just because something is "phony" doesn't mean it isn't important.
>>539251577Private property is a means of organizing society and achieving growth and stability. If no one owned anything, it would quickly turn into a grab-what-you-can anarchy.
>>539251577Its still private property if anyone owns it, including jews or any other flavor of brown shitskin. That means its private even if a government owns it. If no one owns it then no one can say you cant be there. Natives never had a concept of land ownership, which means they didnt own it, so hot could we have stolen it from them if they didn't own it in the first place? Nigger.
>>539251917Private property laws always result in slavery of the masses to support the privileged few.
>>539251577If it's uncreated it's unowned. If it's unowned it can be claimed by homesteading. One it's homesteaded it becomes property that can be traded and owned. To say that we don't have a right to property on earth because we didn't create it, is to assume that nature has property rights of its own, when the natural condition is the absence of property. This is obviously absurd.
>>539252096If you don't own your body then how is forcing you to work against your own wishes slavery?
>>539252096Let's say all governments around the world abolished private property. Let's assume hordes of pillagers would move from town to town, village to village, killing, raping and stealing whatever they can. Other people would realize that they're next. Neighbors would gather around and decide that old property laws remain in place. They would also agree to protect one another from the coming hordes. What they've done in that instance is that they've practically created a new state. And that's exactly what would ensue if private property would be abolished. People would start organizing amongst themselves and create mini-states collective defense pacts.
>>539251577
>>539252096I'm betting if some random person walked into your home you would call the police.
>>539252096Would you be fine with me just going into your home and taking all your shit?
>>539251577can i take all of your stuff?
>>539251577>did this Leopard make the land he patrols?>no?>then what gives him the right to have territory?! who does this leopard think they are???
>>539251577every man is entitled to his own land. using it in a predatory manner towards the desperate makes you a kike.
>>539251577Give me your clothes.
HE DOES HAVE A GOOD POINTHE'S RIGHT YOU KNOWNOW THAT THE DUST HAS SETTLEDSAY SOMETHING NICEPOWERFULREALLY MAKES YOU THINKWHAT ARE THE POLITICAL IMPLICATIONSPUBLIC TRANSPORTATIONKNEELPOLITICALLY SPEAKINGAPOLOGIZEBASED OR CRINGELET ME GUESS YOU NEED MOREHOW DO YOU RESPOND WITHOUT SOUNDING MADWHAT DID HE MEAN BY THISWHY DO AMERICANSWHO WAS IN THE WRONGDAILY REMINDERWELL /POL/YOUR RESPONSEIT'S OVERPOL CAN'T REFUTE THISTHIS IS THE POST THAT KILLED /POL/POL BTFOTHOUGHTS?
>>539251577when you build your dwelling im taking it.
>>539252587W
>>539251577It's not really is mostly a problem only if you are black, and want more blacks in your country instead of living as white between whites.
Cause I have this, now get off my property tranny.
squatter's rights, the owner has been gone for thousands of years.
>>539252786Yes, shit is disgusting. I currently pay too much for septic tank cleaners and dog shit removers, please do it for free.
>>539251917Getting rid of private property rights does not mean a free for all. If fact for many people there would be no change to their circumstances. People who own a regular sized house would be allowed to continue using that property. But large land owners, and second homes, and rental properties would be ceased by the state, and reallocated.
