If you were born by accident once, and everything we can see in the universe seems to be based on repetitive cycles, then wouldn't it be illogical to think you won't be accidentally born again? Reincarnation just makes scientific sense. Linear Time Enthusiasts tongue my anus. This is political because a lot of people think they need to choose between Abrahamism and Eternal Nothingness, but the reality is that there's a solid argument to be made for Cyclical Time in an atheist context>but I won't remember anything, do what's the pointWould you rather die or just have amnesia? Just take the fractalpill bro, we're all living in a fractal
>>539256845>by accidentwhat if its not an accident but a thermodynamic inevitability?>on repetitive cyclesits an infinite continuous process.>Reincarnationit wont be (You) tho.if the ocean washes away a sandcastle the sand doesnt dissappear, the complexity and organization is what vanishes. if you rearrange it into a new sandcastle, is it the same sandcastle?not really.>and Eternal Nothingnessthe universe is infinite and so is life.>Cyclical Timetime is just a secondary measurement of movement, its not some extra dimension.
>>539256845>everything we can see in the universe seems to be based on repetitive cyclesSays who? This is the foundation of your entire point, the least you could do is support it.
>>539257446>the universe is infinite and so is lifeI have one small problem with this. Eventually the universe will collapse. Sure it could 850 quadrillion years but it will stop expanding at some point and bounce back like a rubber band. Then what?
>>539256845>Soiboi chud simp reincarnation: your immaterial metaphysical soul travels to another body when you die>master race aryan ubermensch chad reincarnation: the universe follows a cyclical cosmology model, the end of the universe triggers a new big bang which produces an identical universe and after a long superdeterministic causal chain of events you are born again to live the exactly same life you have been living since forever, you cannot change anything and you're not aware of anything. Eternal recurrence.
Reincarnation is real, and it is generation. You are your ancestors re incarnate, and your progeny is you. There arent souls floating aound waiting to inhabit some random vessel. The "lottery" idea that people talk about ie genetic lottery, is liberal nonsense.
>>539256845Does that mean my dick is getting bigger every day? Galactically speaking
4chaniggers believing in souls in 2026. Ridiculous!Just take some hallucinogens and realize you are actually god. Well you aren't. You're just a background character/NPC in this solipsistic nightmare. But I am god.
>>539258665The space between galaxies is expanding, which technically means there is more space in the universe and the space your penis occupies is constant. Thus, your penis is getting relatively smaller on a universal scale.
>>539256845>Would you rather die or just have amnesia?I'd rather die.we've gotten to the point where the bad outweighs the good.when we're all on our deathbeds we're all going to say what a shitty life
>>539257977>Eventually the universe will collapse.it wont, its infinite and thats as far as we know with actual observations.>it will stop expandingwe dont actually know if its expanding and redshift was proven not to work like mainstream jew science claims.so yes its indeed most likely infinite. it goes on forever.
>>539259065squidward hands typed this postalso>wespeak for yourself, some of us are enjoying the drug addiction and solitude lol
>>539256845This is essentially a turbocope that attempts to square the unordered nature of the cosmos with a sense of personhood. Not that it would matter, because since you're locked into a particular course of action anyway, you'd just reincarnate yourself into the same shitty situation in an eternal recurrence.
>>539257446Time is absolutely a dimension just like longitude and the others, we just dont perceive it that way cause we are trapped in this plane. To understand it just reduce it so your brain can understand. Imagine a universe that is 2 dimensional and the third dimension ia their time. Each moment of what they experience as time is just a superposition of two dimensional flat planes that get stack across the third dimension like pages in a book. We are in a 4 dimensional book .ade of three dimensional pages.
>>539257977Thinking purely like a fedora-wearing atheist... if the Big Bang happened by accident, isn't it awfully arrogant to think we're so heckin super special and unique that it happened just for us? Isn't it equally as likely that whatever caused the accident will cause it again?>>539257613look around you. nothing is unique, and it all moves in spirals or circles. atoms, galaxies, cells, dna, political movements, the global economy, all can be mapped into a pendulum, or a spiral, or a circle.
>>539259332>Time is absolutely a dimension no its not, you are probably still stuck with the dumb jewish idea that math is reality and not a derivative of reality. math is math and reality is reality. jews teached you wrong because their entire religion hinges on the idea.>we just dont perceive it that waythe only thing we perceive is the movement. time is the secondary measurement of it.its simple.>Imagine a universe that is 2 dimensional and the third dimension ia their time.thats not how the universe works tho.
the thing is, if you die, and then something appears somewhere that retains all your memories and your sense of self...does your current consciousness actually continue into that thing? or does that thing, which is wholly new, merely have the impression of retaining all your memories while in fact it was simply created with that impression of having your memories?many scenarios are possible, but if consciousness cannot make leaps, none of them have anything to do with (you)
>>539256845You’re here forever
>>539259471No disrepect but maybe you are not as bright as you think. Im under the impression that you are an atheist/materialist. I feel sorry for you buddy. There is light out there, i hope you find it.
>>539259298the cosmos seem pretty predictable to me. i think eternal recurrence is more likely than linear time, because everything in the universe is mind-numbingly repetitive. the idea that this big bang is super unique and special just for us seems more "woowoo" than the idea that big bangs happen and we're living in one of them and it's probably mind-numbingly repetitive like every other cycle in existence
>>539258789Some arguments for the existence of souls:https://benthams.substack.com/p/you-are-a-soul
>>539259203There’s only so much energy in the universe and things can only rearrange on an atomic level so much. >>539259465I believe in God retard. Whatever is next is up to him but this shit going on right now is on borrowed time. So fuck you.
>>539259065
>>539259592Energy is neither created or destroyed. which brings me into my next hypothesis: cosmipsychism. Consciousness may be a singular unitary force of the universe itself and each individual is just an emanation of the primordial consciousness of electricity. So basically, I think Animism is scientific, and I'm tired of pretending it's not, lol
>>539259645>you are not as bright as you think.thats you, not me. you got this brainwashing from public "education" ran by jews.thats why you are still stuck with failed jewish ideas.>atheist/materialistno god is needed to make anything in the universe work.>There is light out therethere is a whole spectrum out there. doesnt require a jewish dickcutter god tho.
>>539259680>There’s only so much energythere is a massive gradient and a gradient is all thats required to keep the energy flowing.also the universe is not constraint by energy, but by the geometry of the atoms.>and things can only rearrange on an atomic level so muchthere is an infinite amount of Hydrogen and Helium out there.
>>539257977Heat death of universe is a Jewish meme
>>539260197exactly, its also demoralization.
>>539256845>noooo. Next time, i'll be something, yea, that's itOnly NPCs and the weak believe in reincarnation.
>atheist who are mad at god desperately tries to get others to worship scientism
>>539256845I personally believe subjective experience will always continue. But nothing useful follows from that belief. There is no Karma or any other kind of essence that exists in this world that will carry through to some proposed next life. Its not even meaningful to talk about reincarnation, as such a thing does not physically exist. Within the external physical world there is no subjective experience no consciousness. Our language, is not even capable of meaningfully talking about consciousness and reincarnation, since our language derives from the physical world in which we all share, where consciousness does not exist.
>>539259910Careful with that edge, dont cut yourself, son. I see you havent moved past your teenage edgy phase, you have my sympathies.Read plato and then plotinus. Then go back to the bible and read it. If you are not entirely hylic perhaps it will do you good. Best of luck
>>539259910>no god is needed to make anything in the universe work.If entropy and causality exists then the universe can't make itself
>>539257977multiple dimensions and universes could exist at the same time and you could just go to another universe if this universe ends
>>539256845For this to make any sense, you have to contend with the Vertiginous Question.Why is the "me" that's experiencing "being me" the "me" that experiences it?In an infinite universe, versions of me are "accidentally forming" all the time. If my subjective experience were encoded on physical media, should I not experience those me's simultaneously? If there is some reason why I can't experience the lives of identical me's concurrently with the me I'm experiencing, then why should I entertain the possibility that I would experience a future me when I die?
>>539260717>im sorry for you buddythe only thing I feel sympathy for is your reliance on ancient texts to explain modern reality.you really think reading Plotinus makes you transcend the physical? lmao. Its literally just more layers of abstraction piled onto a foundation of guesswork.now go read your jew bible, pray to your imaginary dickcutter jew god all you want. changes nothing about actual physics tho.>>539260858>the universe can't make itselfIt's not making itself its reacting.and causality is just the inevitable direction of energy moving from high potential to low potential.the plasma rich universe that we live in is governed by non equilibrium thermodynamics and complex structures emerge naturally from these gradients.so yes no creator required.just physics doing what it does every time an electron moves.
>>539260858And thats even ignoring the fact that for a universe to exist there has to be a law that determines how it works. A law that is "prior" to the universe. Without it, it cannot even start.Otherwise its like claiming a videogame or virtual reality doesnt need a code that determines a priori how that virtual reality began works and functions. And where there is a code there is a coder...>Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.>20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools
>>539261291>A lawyour "laws" arent pre existing instructions tho.the "laws" are emergent properties of complex electromagnetic interactions. so you are still trying to find the jew god because your brain cant wrap itself around a system that functions perfectly well via self organizing non equilibrium thermodynamics without any divine oversight.
>>539261159You are a tiny branch of the universe's consciousness. You're like a twig on the tree of consciousness. Your individual identity is just an illusion based on the fact that you can't link up with other brains at the moment. In fact, if you started thinking of society as "we" then you could start seeing yourself as a molecule and begin to expand your concept of "self" and "identity" to be greater than just your current body.
>>539256845Jeet thread
>>539256845I can't believe the some people actually believe in the concept of "Eternal Nothingness"."Nothing" is not something that could ever be perceived. You literally CANNOT "(experience) nothing".It's almost the perfect IQ test. If somebody says "I believe after we die there's just nothing" then I automatically know I'm talking to a genuine moron.
>>539261505Nope. Self-hating jew thread. Death to Abrahamism
>>539256845>timeThere isn't any, time doesn't have 'dimension' (linear or cyclical)Only the eternal now
>>539261444If this universe had a beginning, and it did, the universal principle/law/logos whatever you want to call it was necessarily a prior/eternal reality to our space time. Otherwise nothing made everything and for no reason at all made it all obey a rational law that doesnt even exist. Dont make me pull out Aristotle to disprove an eternal casual chain of events, please. There is casuality therefore there is a beginning cause.
>>539261505>goy stop discussing other religions that is not sand nigger derived
Is this the thread? Its all spirals brah ive gone through all the things and did everything. Its all spirals nigga.
This was a big brain moment for you to realize this, people dont understand how big of a realization it is unless they come to it themselves. I understand anon.
>>539261632>>539261632Thats only in the monad/pleroma. We are trapped down here and in our perspective there is such a thing as movement and change. But ultimately you are right, I think.
>>539256845You know when they say go into the light? That light you see when you die, is the first bit of light peeking through as you are pulled out of your mother and leave the darkness of the womb. It all just repeats.
>>539261750>Causality sorry for phone posting, friend
>>539261750>nothing made everything.things don't "obey" laws like they are following instructions. things move because of their inherent physical properties.a magnet doesnt know the laws of magnetism and yet it simply reacts to an opposing field.you also assume the universe must have had a beginning. thats an unproven assumption.and in a cyclical, fractal, or infinite plasma universe model there is no T=0.there is only constant eternal movement and transformation of energy.you see still no jew god needed.
>>539261264lol you literally didn't refute what I said. If energy goes from a high state to a low state then what force puts the energy into a high state? What is the first cause that things "react" to?
Attached as we have been to wives, sons, daughters, kingdoms-Still now they are lost forever.For how many lifetimes will we subject ourselvesto painful labor of body, speech and thought?It is time to stop.
>>539262197>What is the first cause that things "react" to?a gradient. thats it. that's your answer.basically there is only the perpetual redistribution of energy across varying potentials.also learn the difference between an event and a cause.
>>539262335and where does the gradient come from?
>>539256845I just don't care for your paganist nonsense.
>>539262384obviously from the interaction itself.these gradients are a byproduct of spatial distribution and field tension so if you have two cosmic scale filaments of plasma with differing charge densities or temperatures passing near each other, then a gradient is the result of that movement.the gradient is basically a manifestation of the difference in potential between those points.
>>539262504lol anon where did the filaments come from? You're not grasping the spirit of the question. If someone can still ask where did X come from then you haven't answered the question "where did the universe come from?"
>>539256845As long as life exists we will always return. Just like we were born here
>>539262593if a god can exist without a creator then why can't a universe exist without a creator? this is like the simplest comparison between those two
>>539262593The same place your "first mover" came from.The main difference is that you add an unnecessary middleman
>>539262670Maybe the universe is a god. It looks like a brain when combined into one image
>>539262593No you are failing to grasp the paradigm shift.your spirit of the question assumes a linear timeline where everything starts at zero.that is a very limited view of existence.in the non linear, cyclical/infinite electromagnetic universe that we obviously live in things dont come from a single moment of creation.they emerge from the ongoing eternal processes of field interactions and energy redistribution.
>>539262104You're just replacing one unexplained fact with another. Saying matter has "inherent properties" isn't an explanation. Why does matter have those properties instead of different ones, or none at all?Listing cyclical or plasma universe models... They're speculative, and even an eternal universe doesn't explain why an eternal, law governed reality exists in the first place.And I never argued that magnets literally "follow instructions." You are strawmaning, friend. The question is why reality is intelligible and governed by consistent regularities at all.So ending with "no God needed" is just an assertion. You haven't actually answered the question.
I want to go back to the void.
>>539262732>It looks like a brain when combined into one imagetheres a catch tho, the Latency.basically intelligence requires coherence, which is the ability to integrate information across a system faster than the state of that system changes.on the human or even AI scale, we deal with nanoseconds and milliseconds.but on a galactic scale governed by the speed of light the propagation delay is astronomical and too slow.so even if the cosmic web has the structural complexity of a neural network it probably lacks the temporal density required for any real computation.like if a "thought" in a galactic circuit takes a billion years to traverse its own architecture the system can never actually hold the thought.the input becomes obsolete before the output can be processed.so sure we might see self organizing dissipative structures at every scale but there is likely something like a "Goldilocks Zone" for intelligence.you kinda need enough complexity to process data but low enough latency to maintain coherence.so these electromagnetic forces create incredible structure but at the macro scale they move too slowly to build anything truly intelligent.so the universe isnt necessarily dumb it just kinda lacks the clock speed to be conscious.we live in the only scale where the physics actually allows for a coherent signal.
>>539262792>you haven't actually answered the questionI didn't answer your assumption, which was wrong.you assumed everything needs a discrete starting cause but in a cyclical plasma based universe (the one we live in) the cause is the ongoing flux itself.matter has its properties because the geometry dictates stability and a tetrahedron stays together because of how spheres pack, a nucleus stays together because electrons act as sort of glue within a dense structure.so if you still think you need a foreskin munching jew God to explain why a proton and electron pair up then you simply don't understand physics.
>>539256845fuck off demiurge
>>539263181You're still answering a different question. Explaining how particles interact does not explain why there is a reality with those properties, geometry, and mathematical structure in the first place. Saying "the ongoing flux is the cause" just makes the flux the unexplained foundation. You haven't eliminated a first principle, you've simply renamed it. Why does an eternal flux exist, and why does it follow consistent mathematical rules? Appealing to a "cyclical plasma universe" doesn't prove that model is true, and even an eternal universe would still leave the question of why there is something rather than nothing, nobody is claiming a proton and electron need God as a replacement for physics. Physics explains the mechanisms. The philosophical question is why there is a universe capable of having mechanisms, laws, and intelligible structure at all. Saying "geometry does it" describes the pattern; it doesn't explain why that pattern exists.
>>539263481>You haven't eliminated a first principle, you've simply renamed it.and you are assuming that every process requires a discrete external reasoner to initiate it.that is a bias of human perception and not a requirement of reality.if a system is eternal and cyclical the first principle is the inherent stability of the loop itself.so no I am not renaming God I am simply removing the unnecessary middleman of "intent" by showing that the system is self causal through geometric and electromagnetic constraints.>Why does matter have those properties instead of different ones, or none at all?because any other configuration would not result in a stable structure, matter exists as stable geometrical packings (like the icosahedron) resulting from spherical dense packing.a proton electron pair (PEP) is the inevitable structural outcome of electrostatic attraction and charge density requirements and the properties dont exist before the interaction they are the mathematical description of the interaction itself. remember math is a derivative of reality.so matter actually doesnt have "properties", matter is the behavior of energy in motion.>Why there is something rather than nothing, why an eternal flux exists?in a non equilibrium thermodynamic universe existence is a gradient and there is only the continuous transition between states of energy.basically the flux doesnt need a reason because the flux is the baseline.>saying geometry does it describes the pattern it doesn't explain why that pattern existsyou still think the pattern and the reality are two separate things when they arent.math is the derivative of physical reality. how many times do I have to repeat this?geometry (the tetrahedron, the PEP etc) is the constraint that allows the pattern to persist.mathematical laws are what we call the observable result of particles interacting under specific geometric constraints.
>>539262670>>539262719God is beyond logic. The material universe is not so it's not the same thing. >>539262746You answer to where all the matter and energy in the universe came from is "it just did"
>>539264610>It just didexactly. energy doesnt ask permission from a foreskin obsessed jew God before it moves.it just follows the gradient.this is called dynamics buddy. you should look into it.
>>539264743lol ok so you have an incredible amount of faith of magic entropy reversal and reverse causality. Also "Because I did that" is usually what a nigger says when asked why he commited a crime
>>539256845>born by accidentWat.OP. There is no "born by accident." Someone put a dick in a vagina. Anyone that tells you any part of that is "accidental" is a lying piece of shit you should make a point of yelling at regularly.In fact, go yell at your mother right now. She fucking deserves it.
>>539264853>magic entropy reversalI never mentioned entropy reversal you absolute moron and you dont even know what you just said.also you are clearly too stupid to understand local vs. universal entropy.a system can decrease its internal entropy by exporting more disorder to its surroundings via energy flux. thats literally how every living thing and star works.its called a dissipative structure and its not magic.>Because I did thatactually reality isnt an intentional actor the universe doesnt say "I did that." The universe just is.you are trying way too hard to apply human agency (crime/criminal) to a field interaction where agency doesnt even exist.
>>539265238lol you're hiding the fact that you have no answers with barely sequitur jargon. You're not contending with the simple fact that something had to cause the big bang. I'm not asking for an explanation on the interaction of energy. Again you are answering the wrong question and in fact physicist will not wax about filaments and how stars work when you ask what came before the big bang which is to ask where all the energy in the universe came from. "Because I said so" isn't an answer.
>>539265471>something had to cause the big bangthere was no big bang.thats a failed model of cosmology propped up by desperate jews.
>>539265640yes preach your religion based on neither faith or science
>>539265471For me, it's not so much what caused the big bang, or potentially a cycle of them, but rather where dark matter and energy both originate from to create the vacuum/void of space itself, the stuff allegedly surrounding any singularity or "bubble" you can imagine. The first unmoved mover of everything possible, essentially.
>>539264945kek
>>539265695actually its purely scientific.
>>539265744>but rather where dark matter and energy both originate fromout of a jews lying ass.dark matter/dark energy is a pure math construct jews came up with to patch their failing big bang cosmology model.
>>539265770>>539265818you don't know anything about science I bet the earth is flat too right?
>>539266056>you don't know anything about sciencethats you tho, not me.>I bet the earth is flat too right?nope.any more cope and seethes?
>>539265818The point stands we do have to give a name to something we haven't figured out. Whether you want to call that blackness displayed outside of the densest particle that they label space "dark matter and energy" or le multiverse doesn't really matter as much. Sure, it's more annoying if a kike takes the credit too but so be it. I simply want to know if there's more dimensions at play without some gay preconceived anthropomorphized framing of everything at the end of the day and life. Because whatever it may be, it's blatantly fucking beyond and above everything on this planet.
>>539266232>The point standsyes the point that Big bang cosmology is jewish retardation and not real and has been failing for 40+ years.>Whether you want to call thatwe dont have to call it anything because it doesnt exist.
>>539256845Unlikely, I mean I haven't died afaik but the conditions are unlikely. We would need some sort of bounded space that continues evolution through time BUT ONLY as it appears right now or in our past. Too many requests of reality. It's far more likely you're dealing with process, meaning the variables as they appear right now have never been in this configuration and can never, by necessity, enter our present configuration again. Really its the same stream twice issue. Likewise, there really isn't two of anything, let alone an infinity.
>>539266315Okay, you want me to believe there's no beginning to the history of everything with no proof? Keep trying foaming "JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW" like Alex Jones for a bit longer, I suppose. It won't change my mind I refuse to accept brute facts if you at least believe consciousness is real. If not, then maybe you're an NPC or literal bot I'm writing to LOL. Good luck!
>>539266232Everything he doesn't like is a kike lie therefore anything is permissible
>>539256845fuck off
>>539266601>Okay, you want me to believe there's no beginning to the history of everything with no proof?Okay but when jews want you to believe there is a beginning to the history of everything with no proof its okay and you just buy it?have you taken many covid vaccines?also are you jewish yourself?that would explain why you still subscribe to the dumbfuck big jew theory despite it having even less evidence.of course you cant accept this, jews cant accept they were wrong.
>>539266614>Everything he doesn't likescience isnt about what you like. thats not how it works.
>>539256845It's not an accident. Everything leads to the evolution of consciousness into God, which transcends time and creates itself.
>>539256845Quantum immortality is more likely than reincarnation. Also fits the definition of heaven or hell depending on your state of mind
>>539266756Funnily enough, many others with experience in cosmology and astrophysics excluding myself who knows nothing compared to said people don't buy that a big bang was the beginning. I'm agnostic and don't buy anything because we have yet to unveil all that there is to know. The epistemological ceiling could raise as technology advances for all we know. But you seem to have it already figured out: so why don't you drop your extensive studies and research giga-Aryan scientist doctor polymath prodigy?
also reminder:>1. The entire cosmos is permeated with plasma. In some regions (within a galaxy, within a solar system) the plasma is denser than it is in others. In some cases the plasma is visible, in some, not.>2. The electrical properties of plasma vastly outweigh its mechanical (gravitational) properties.>3. There is nothing mysterious about magnetic fields. They do not "get tangled up", "break", "merge", or "reconnect". They require moving charges (electric currents) in order to exist.>4. The relative distances between even the most densely packed stars are vast in comparison to those stars' diameters.>5. The homopolar motor - generator shape seems to be ubiquitous. Stars, pulsars, and galaxies are organized in this morphology.>6. The z-pinch effect that occurs in Birkeland currents (electrical currents that flow through plasmas) is responsible for the accretion of stars, planets, and galaxies.>7. It is quite possible that the solar system started out as a collinear array of "Herbig - Haro" type objects formed by a z-pinch.>8. The presumption that, if an object exhibits redshift, it must be far away - is false.>9. The Big Bang Theory is false. It has been defended in a most unscientific way.>10. There is a lot more electrical activity out there in the cosmos than astrophysicists seem to want to admit.>11. Astrophysicists and cosmologists need to take some courses in electrodynamic field theory and experimental plasma physics.>12. Astrophysicists need to stop acting in a "knee- jerk" confrontational way to any ideas involving electricity.>13. Astrophysicists should stop dreaming up impossible imaginary entities such as black holes, neutron stars, strange matter, WIMPs, MACHOs, and MOND, when a perfectly real and well understood body of knowledge stands ready to explain all the things that "mystify" them so.
>>539267034>myself who knows nothing compared to said peopleare you a cuck? why the appeal to authority. if jews lie to you about everything why would you accept their cosmology as fact? do your own research or cant you do this because your skin tone is too dark?also you dont have to remain a dumb fuck forever, a lot of the stuff can easily be learned and the concepts, experiments and empirical observations exist for a long time now. so no I didnt make up anything.
>>539256845you’re here forEVER buddy
>>539267270At least they HAVE a name, while you are unashamedly fucking no one who's posted nothing of substance the whole time, and that's all you'll ever amount to being. You're another shade of flerfer like the other dude insinuated LMAO rope proud nigger and kike blacked membership worshipping shit smearing toilet rim licking troglodyte have your family if there's any remaining get raped by an imported violent mudslime
>>539267586>that wall of kvetchinglmao so you are jewish.
>>539267715>muhhh electric universe soooo differntt from flat eartfffff mmhhmrrrrbahhhhh me sooo smaaaahhhtt
>>539256845Reincarnation doesn't really work. It's a pretty nihilistic idea, honestly.You gotta ask yourself to what purpose would you keep reincarnating?You can either say there's no purpose and it's statistical inevitability in an infinite universe but that's materialism and you have to somehow work-in infinity in the the grand picture of a universe that has a demonstrable beginning and an end.Otherwise you have to explain the purpose of a process where you suffer die and then suffer again without having gained, perserved or improved yourself in any aspect.
>>539256845Altered carbon.
>>539267867>oy vey goyim electricity isnt reallmao
>>539267958>desperately strawmans me with zero effort the same as as a toddler yelping "ur wrong"Too bad, nigger and kike shit eater. The universe is dominated by gravity and not electromagnetism, of which does also exist, and you haven't the empirical data to prove otherwise. Incoming bot loop!
>>539268258>The universe is dominated by gravitynope
>>539268303
>>539256845>then wouldn't it be illogical to think you won't be accidentally born again?Not at all, if you are seeing repetitive cycles, that is because that is a feature of the universe, or an algorithm. It is much more likely you enter the challenge, and either lose by your actions a chance to enter a different place built for you to challenge. Reincarnation is a mechanism for claim to lineage and status. It has nothing to do with the algorithm. You carry nothing but your relationship to the immaterial when you shift from existence within the boundaries of space and time to not participation within, there is no carry over for the simple reason that those repetitive cycles would be eventually exposed and charted and therefore subject to manipulation.
>>539261159Consciousness is an electromagnetic phenomenon and you are a discrete circuit, separate from others.
