What are the implications of environmental regulations causing car companies to throw away bulletproof car engines in favor of shitty turbo v4s? I thought we banned leaded gas and that was enough
>v4 Retard alert
>>539258891Total destruction is the goal.Everything will be done to eradicate everything and anything that was ever good.That sounds hyperbolic and yet it's completely true. We will become Cuba in less than a decade.We'll be U.S.S.A. in about twenty years.Unless, that is, a young sensitive zoomer comes along.
Also -I miss when we had real cars.I will vote for anyone who brings us back to sanity.
>>539258891While it sucks sometimes it’s best to let old things die for newer more efficient motors. Gotta remember for every “legendary” motor like this there were a dozen mediocre ones. Just like now
>>539258891>v4But yeah, naturally aspirated port injected inline 4s are probably the most ecologically sound engines ever developed between long lives and high mpgs.
>>539258891>in favor of shitty turbo v4sthis nigga really thinks turbo four-cylinder engines are a new thing. We've had amazing engines in that setup for a while now.>v4syou mean inline-four your fucking retard. Do some more research my Tiktok brained Zoomerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofZ5JVhgEcw
>>539260707Can still get these over there. Best car you guys never really bought into.
>>539261376Zoomers can't into 3.0L 4JJ engines either.
>>539259473>>v4 >Retard alertSAAB Proto. V4 tiny 2 seater sports car. It was short lived but people collected them and loved them. Those v4's being light fast sports cars, I wonder what a turbo on the same concept would be like. Might really be something.
