I have seen this graph posted here and elsewhere ad nauseum, so it's about time that someone addressed it.1. The article that this came from was from 2010 and contained literally zero information on the sample size nor its demographics. This will be relevant later (point 4).2. The reason that the graph looks different than the male one is quite obvious: virtually zero men were rated as being a 5/5 on the attractiveness scale, so they won't get many messages because THEY BARELY EXIST ACCORDING TO THE WOMEN IN THE STUDY.3. Women take advantage of less attractive men (usually financially, surveys have shown), so interpreting the fact that average dudes got the most messages is wrong; you are assuming that sending a message means genuine desire (it does not).4. A similar study in the Czech Republic was done some years back with similar findings (women not preferring men that are more attractive than themselves), however the researchers actually advised against interpreting the results as such because so few men were getting messages anyways. The average age in the Czechia study was also 29 when women are probably more likely to forego facial attractiveness for resources instead.Save this for the next time someone peddles this bullshit
>>539261129No one really gives a shit about dating anymore so who cares
>>539261129Those charts were always ragebait for women anyway.Basically they get repeatedly chadfished and demoralized. Thats how we keep them paying taxes and entering into giga debt.
>>539261467It's dead
