For context, you could drop a nuclear bomb on Yellowstone every day for decades, and it would not so much as tickle the volcano. I don’t think these slant eyed chinks actually understand how big this area is and how hard it is to make the Earth give a shit about what weapons you drop on it.
>>539272841Seriously, anytime you bring up the fact that three gorges Dan could destroy China for a few nudes. They immediately pivot like crazy to Yellowstone
>>539272871aren't they "Science Must Fall"/Geography of Thought/superstitious people.they seem like holistic earth based something or other like they could pray it to explode or somethingyou're arguing science with the third world
You comment great dishonor.
>>539272927It’s just so weird to me though because it’s like they think real life is anime or some work of fiction. It’s entirely plausible that a nuclear dead nation at or near the three gorgeous Dan cost significant enough damage for the water pressure weighing down on the destroyed areas to break and buckle, causing massive flooding. On the other hand, they literally think that dropping a few hundred kilo, tons of TNT against something. The size of a few states in America and deep as the entire crust of the Earth would be enough to magically dead native volcano. Seriously talk about three gorgeous damn sometime in another thread they will go straight to that cope. It’s so bizarre and it really makes me wonder if they are genuinely retarded.>>539272947I comment facts only
>>539273058have you read geography of thought?https://youtu.be/C9SiRNibD14
>>539273240No, I haven’t, but I find the Chinese response to the very obvious strategic dilemma they have with the dam to be very unscientific. >hurr we nook yerro storn rike roony toonsThe Earth is extremely dense and nukes do very little nothing at all to pretty much the surface.
>>539273575you said that
>>539272841Why exactly do Americans think a dam bursting is going to be so utterly destructive? Are they retarded and do not understand that hurricanes and earthquakes happen but don't kill nations?
>>539272871I have been lurking on pol for a while and it has never happened.
>>539272841kek saw some "Australian" post mentioning this retardation earlier, as if it was some gotcha to the three gorges delete button. Most amusing.
No need to waste on Yellowstone.American mid west winds are our friend.Just nuke the rich coastal cities on either coast, and then nuke the agricultural heartland of the US and the winds will carry the fallout across the US and poison and kill everyone in between.China is much more mountainous. You can nuke the central plane and the three gorges dam (which won't do much since it's a gravity dam of immense size, even the debris will continue to function as a dam lmao), but we will survive in the Sichuan mountain basins and underground cities.In the end, it's a question about the efficiency of nukes used vs million of kills, and our dam might appear as a juicy target, but will be a waste of nukes because it would just be like nuking a mountain, and then you will need to nuke every single valley in Sichuan, Qinghai, Tibet etc to get every single settlement and ICBM mobile launcher to stop our retaliation.America, on the other hand, can get the majority of it's 300M people killed with a modest amount of our megaton level city busters and our wind fallout strategy.
>>539275690Given how efficiently modern nukes utilize nuclear material, radiation is minimal, and drops rapidly. Debris from the dam serving as a dam is bigger cope than I have seen over at /chug/, so you are competing in the big leagues.
>>539275757You got to read what a gravity dam actually is. It's not something like the Hoover dam or the dams the Allied Forces blew up during WW2 with those barrel bombs. Gravity dams are submerged mountains that are conical/pyramid in shape. Nuking them is like nuking a mountain and probably won't even create much debris.As for low radiation nukes, leave that the the explosion setting and the other stuff we will put in. Cobalt 60 isotopes work well for poisoning agricultural lands and making cities uninhabitable.
>>539274153Because historically they have created calamity and China already struggles with flooding every year
