[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: brianf.jpg (186 KB, 828x882)
186 KB JPG
>Brian Faling, 37, is charged with one felony count of possession of child sexual abuse material.
>According to Hall County court records, Grand Island police received a report in June from a 17-year-old that her boss had AI-altered photos of her that were sexually explicit.
>The victim said Faling showed her the image and that the photo had been shown to other employees, the court record revealed.
>The affidavit said an employee and the victim then confronted Faling. Faling said a random person had sent him the pictures through an encrypted messaging app.
>Police eventually obtained a search warrant for his electronic devices. That led to the discovery of the images on his devices via the Google Wallpaper app.
>A judge ordered Faling’s bond at 10 percent of a $125,000. His next court date is set for August 5 at 10 a.m.
https://www.ksnblocal4.com/2026/07/20/man-charged-after-being-possession-ai-generated-child-porn/?outputType=amp
>>
>>539326636
sounds about white
>>
File: Carlos_Ramon.png (301 KB, 600x600)
301 KB PNG
>>539326636
>More like Brain Failing
>>
>>539326636
Why are whites so deranged
>>
I look like this and do this
>>
17, terrible stuff. She's just a little kid.
>>
>>539326786
Nigger, a quarter of the world worships a pedophile, and almost all of them are brown.
You're Indian. Doesn't almost every single one of your dumb mythological stories involve rape?
Shut the fuck up.
>>
>>539326636
Zero wrinkles at 37 though, take that zoomies
>>
>>539326636
>Faling said a random person had sent him the pictures through an encrypted messaging app.
Has this lie ever worked?
>>
File: IMG_0500.jpg (74 KB, 987x1024)
74 KB JPG
>>539326636
>The victim said Faling showed her the image
He ratted on himself?
What a fucking idiot.

>>539326698
You were saying?
>>
>>539326786
>>539326698
17 is old enough to have sex in your shitholes, almost twice the muslim age of consent, and the entirely wrong species for an indian man (they prefer street dogs)
>>
>>539326636
>Ai generated of a 17 year old
At most this is nonconsentual images created, perhaps boss taking advantage of an employee
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_in_the_United_States
>age of consent in Nebraska is 16
This bitch is over the age of consent. This isn't cp. Kill yourself OP.
>>
>pearl clutching over sexualizing a 17 yo breeding age female

welcome to the gynocracy dystopian future
>>
>>539326636
where's the crime? that should be defamation at most.
>>
File: 1728904664882383m.jpg (104 KB, 768x1024)
104 KB JPG
SHE WAS 17 YOU SICK FUCK
>>
>>539326636
>17-year-old

Sigh... no crime was committed.
>>
>>539326636
why are all white people pedophiles
>>
>slaves go to prison for asking gpt to generate an image
>masters fuck and suck illegal meat on Epstein island and normalfags worship them for it
chimp tier species
>>
>>539326786
Yeah! He should have just raped her like a proper brahmin.
>>
File: 1757013446174233.png (128 KB, 322x368)
128 KB PNG
>>539326636

If you read the article you'll see it's not the AI he was arrested for, it's because he used AI to manipulate a picture of a specific living minor into being sexually explicit via AI:
>According to Hall County court records, Grand Island police received a report in June from a 17-year-old that her boss had AI-altered photos of her that were sexually explicit.

The police will make damn sure never to arrest anyone under these specific circumstances who has the financial clout to appeal and keep appealing this very specific type of circumstance because, honestly, if AI-augmented CSAM goes to a federal appellate court it'd get knocked down. The biggest hole in the legal theory is pretty simple: How is this any different from me cutting out a picture of a face and pasting it over face of a person performing a sex act in a XXX magazine? The problem is IF you wanna say "the law of the land says that THAT qualifies as CSAM" then it's puts manipulated images of all sorts into a weird legal place that nobody, especially liberals, wants it to go misadventuring.
>>
>>539326786
A lot of them just can't help themselves, like niggers a lot of them are impulsive animals. Niggers are violent whites are freaks. AI needs to be locked behind ID verification so degenerates can't do this shit. In fact AI shouldn't even be available to the public outside of professional settings. Nigger cattle just cannot use it responsibly.
>>
>>539326636

> shown to other employees,

God damn, how do you make it to 37 and be employed and being that fucking dumb
>>
>>539326942
The age of consent should be 30 or whenever women choose to settle down after their eggs run out so their libido runs out and you're a pedophile if you disagree despite teenage women having more sexual experience than men twice their age.

JFL at the concept of "child" porn when has 95% the same amount of nudity that they post on social media. Death to America and death to American culture.
>>
>>539326942
Cp is anything under 18, has nothing to do with age of consent, you can be arrested for having naked pictures of yourself under 18
>>
>>539326636
what if he told grok to age her into a consenting 18 year old.
if legality is defined by the real subject age and not the depicted age, then de-aging adult women would be legal?.
>>
>>539327445
It won’t make sense since the point of these laws is to prevent people from exposing sex trafficking organisations
>>
>>539327280

lmao her boss too. like he ai generated a naked picture of his coworker, and for some reason decided to show it to her

What was the plan here
>>
>>539327299
>Cp is anything under 18, has nothing to do with age of consent, you can be arrested for having naked pictures of yourself under 18
Quote me chapter and verse, title and section where that is, nigger.
Cornell University has the law archives, or go to the fedgov websites. Start there.
>>
>>539326636
We told you Novelai is a weapon
>>
>>539326636
this is why I'm pro circumcision despite the many that have a chimpout over it
your dick will make you do insane shit and it's never ever worth it
>>
>>539327543
>What was the plan here
probably to fuck her.
work was most likely full of sexual jokes and he wanted catch her attention. another anon in this thread says the consent age is 16.
what really messed him up was showing the pics to everyone else.
>>
>>539327601
No the anon is right, age of consent and age of CP are different. There are also different rules for someone who is 17 who you move across state lines even if they hypothetically could consent in another state.
>SOURCE??!??!
No argument.
>>
>>539327280
>>539327543
Either she or an ENTIRELY UNRELATED third party got the ick, they have mandatory minimums for this stuff and even if she acted 100% receptive but she or her girlfriends got the ick at any point it's a crime.
That's how it works, ick-based laws. He could have had a clear signal to just do whatever but her fat nigger friend said no, for example. She could have said no, but without ever saying no at any point, as another example.
>>
>>539327445
They'd figure out a way to make that an aggravating factor
>>
Hey looky /pol/ users defending underage pornography
Surprise
Surprise
>>
>>539328029
victimless crime
>>
>>539327543
There's no way it was a full nude, or nobody who could hold even the lowest management position would show it to anyone. That's too dumb. I'm guessing it was a bikini pic or something that an idiot would've thought would be "okay."
>>
>>539326636
Typical white and kike behavior
>>
>>539327601
Title 18 Section 2256.
>For the purposes of this chapter, the term—
>(1) "minor" means any person under the age of eighteen years;

>(8) "child pornography" means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
>(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
>(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
>(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

Your argument, while retarded and ultimately incorrect, was so confident you actually convinced me to look it up. I bet I just got added to another list now, congratulations.
>>
>>539326636
islam is right about women
>>
>>539326636
Imagine having your life ruined by people that view and possess actual CP because you owned fake images of a 17-year-old. What in the everyloving goddamned fuck.
>>
>>539326786
It's the south man. Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama etc.
>>
>>539326636
>>The victim said Faling showed her the image and that the photo had been shown to other employees, the court record revealed
So he could've got away with it if he wasn't a total moron? Why on Earth did he think telling the victim and showing it off to coworkers was a good idea?
>>
>>539326636
did the ai snitch on him?
Also, why not arrest the people on the list too while you are at it? Laws for thee but not for me
>>
>>539327601
>>539328056
Yeah anon you're a massive retarded nigger, there are loads of places around the world (in first world countries even) where the age of consent is 14 or 15 but they can't make porn or do nudes until they're 18.
That's why you can't just google it and find it. It really should have been self-evident, that somehow they made this big global system of agreements that made it illegal to look at a 17 year old naked.
Unless she's doing a nudism, of course.
Or it's used in a hollywood movie, of course.
>>
>>539326636
>Class 2A felony for this bullshit
This is the dumbest, most retarded bullshit I have ever seen in my life. Land of the free my ass, they hand out felonies like candies for absolute nonsense and you lose your gun rights. For this. This country is fucked.
>>
>>539328086
For real. What if you drew a naked picture of her? Holy shit get the fucking nuremberg and electric chair ready this is the crime of the millennium right here.

I think what he did was wrong but this punishment is too severe.
>>
>>539326636
My heart goes out to the 17 year old who just lost her virginity again for the 10th time
>>
File: 1781964243625451.gif (261 KB, 220x197)
261 KB GIF
>>539326636
>Faling showed her the image
>>
>>539328371
This is what happens when everybody goes complaining on internet message boards rather than throwing everyone out every election so nobody serves more than one term.
>>
por why
>>
>$125,000 bond
Yeah, that's completely fair and totally not fucking crazy.
Fuck normies.
>>
>>539327299
Children cannot consent to sex. If someone can consent to sex they are by definition an adult. There is only child & adult. If not child then it's ADULT porn. There's no such thing as adult being downgraded to child based on a sexual act. Adult is adult.
>>
>>539328596
>Surely this will hold up in court
>>
>>539328218
lots of the world just bans the possession of pornography outright and criminalizes the production of it. A huge portion of the world doesn't have a distinction for CP.
>>
>>539328596
It's a whore who took a zillion broccolihead dicks before 9th grade, settle down.
>>
>>539326786
whites are no different than jews. whites do evil shit all the time and then cry that jews made them do it to escape accountability.
>>
>>539328596
I’d like to see a double blind, randomly control trial where you had to guess who you were talking to an adult or a child.
>>
>>539326636
Does this mean they'll finally ban pedo literature like Piers Anthony's FIREFLY and similar shit? I like reading erotic literature and I'm sick of pedo shit being all over ALL of the erotic literature sites. That shit needs to be banned and deleted.
>>
>>539328808
Kill yourself
>>
Doesn’t stop cops from using ai to change what you say
>>
>>539328836
You first, Pedo Faggot.
>>
>>539328218
>this big global system of agreements that made it illegal to look at a 17 year old naked
once boomers are dead, there's nobody left to uphold this law. besides roasties if they somehow don't kill themselves in their 40s
>>
>>539327445
This is the real retardation of AoC laws. It's what were stuck with though, you can't have legal and socially acceptable pornography and fornication without an AoC or every Tom, Dick, and Harry can defile your daughter with impunity instead of just a handful of jews and their shabbos goy/schwartzer pets.
>>
>>539328056
>Your argument, while retarded and ultimately incorrect, was so confident you actually convinced me to look it up
I stand corrected, thank you.
>I bet I just got added to another list now, congratulations
I apologize.
>>
>>539326846
That's practically a fetus still
>>
>>539328895
Nah, I'm good. I'm a life affirming person.
>>
>>539327299
18 is considered a guideline due to prostitution and receiving money for sex, so whilst prostitution is still illegal it is one of those things that is tolerated in society at some level. So 17 would be considered out of bounds for someone making AI porn of them even if there was zero intention to make money of it. Frankly the guy is a creep for even wanting to make AI porn (or Faceswapping) a 17 year old and also one he hired or at least was the boss of. And to cap it all he then shared it among other workers. Now he will lose his job, career and will be on a sex register all for doing something so stupid.
>>
>>539326636
>brian falling
kino
>>
File: 1762757049931229.jpg (130 KB, 992x670)
130 KB JPG
>>539326786
>the Whitings saaar
Stop fucking projecting rajesh
>>
When I rule the world it will literally be legal to ask your 17 year old employee for a blowjob.
>>
>>539329209
will it be legal to fire her if she refuses? promote her if she agrees?
>>
File: IMG_6673.png (122 KB, 624x479)
122 KB PNG
>>539326636
i guess we gotta go back to using our imaginations, huh?
>>
>>539326636
>SHE WAS 17 AND 364.82 DAYS OLD YOU SUCK FUCK!
>>
>>539329305
Sure, why not.
>>
>>539326636
Meanwhile "cant use images..." on google is supreme.
>>
>>539326938
Okay but you're still not allowed to look at nude pics of anyone under 18 in many countries, including the one where you seem to be posting from.
>>
>>539326636
I don't get it. people did it with photoshop for 25 years before and nobody cared. why making it with AI suddenly worse than murder?
>>
>>539326636

17 years old .. not a child

ruin a man's life for poor decision .. seem extreme reaction

now if the girl was under 15 then maybe it would be a correct judgement
>>
File: 1750164028791660.gif (216 KB, 100x100)
216 KB GIF
>>539326636
>Google Wallpaper app
hahahahahaha
>>
>>539328218
Minor is universally understood as under 18.
Look, your law is written in a way. take it up with the legislator.
Also your law apparently says"engaging in sexually explicit conduct" , so naked is fine.
>>
>>539329992
>>539330067
it's one thing to make random person CP

it's another to make porn of a coworker then distribute it. he's a fucking psycho
>>
>>539326698
He’s not white; he’s a Slav
>>
>>539330215
based*
>>
>>539326636
How can a 37-year-old man be this stupid? How was a guy this retarded anyone's boss lol?
>>
>>539331109
He's white trash. Why are you shocked?
>>
File: 1783800935589231.png (18 KB, 840x1000)
18 KB PNG
>>539326786
>>
>>539330215
having a creepy guy coming at the coffee room to show how he added tits to the secretary nobody likes is older than you. they just did it with photoshop before, or even a collage with some hustler page.
>>
File: 1782944492684051.jpg (37 KB, 820x713)
37 KB JPG
>>539329209
When I rule the world it will literally be legal to ask your 14 year old students for a blowjob.
>>
>>539326888
Retards stay young
>>
>>539326636

Digital fantasy shit, 17 year old fantasy shit especially

Yeah ok, kill yourselves Piggers, Reptiles, and virtue signalers Anons
>>
File: yousickfucknumbers.jpg (652 KB, 1290x1175)
652 KB JPG
>>539326636
>>
>>539331598
>Old enough to fuck in most countries.
>One fake nude photo = instant pedo

The law really makes sense doesn't it?
>>
>>539326636
Why is a child allowed to work? I thought muttistan had child labor laws
>>
>>539331650
>17 years old
>child
>>
>>539327257
>How is this any different from me cutting out a picture of a face and pasting it over face of a person performing a sex act in a XXX magazine?
That is very simple: do it with the face of my daughter and I’ll beat you to death.
I’m also very sure it’s illegal if it’s with the face of a minor, you sick fuck
>>
>>539331488
an anonymous letter to HR and you don’t have to see him anymore at the job
>>
>>539330441
The mutt cope. Was your mumma fucked by many?
>>
>>539331643
I don't think anyone except boomers cares about "sex offenders" at this point.
>Look, this guy pulled prime pussy!
Am I supposed to be mad or jealous or what? I get those letters in the mail and I'd shake his hand if I saw them.
>>
>>539326636
At least they're stupid enough to show it.
>>
>>539326931
Note how 65+ takes a big spike, and is the 2nd highest, only behind 18-24. I watched one of those police videos on jewtube involving a nursing home nigger raping an elderly white woman as she was dying. Hard to fault some of these White women who hate White men when we are the ones that allow this to happen.
>>
>see 17 year old girl
>imagine her naked
>photoshop her naked by hand
So that's child porn now?
>>
>>539332255
Not if you photoshop in some wrinkles
>>
>>539326636
Why did he go around at work and show it to everyone though lol


Retard
>>
>>539327299
I was in high school in 2013 and everyone was taking and sharing nudes. I can only imagine how much teens of today are and have.
>>
It's not casm, but it seem like ordinary harassment.
>>
>>539332025
>Hard to fault some of these White women who hate White men when we are the ones that allow this to happen.
As if such women were even aware blacks were raping geriatric white women.
>>
File: 2026-07-21_09-32.png (35 KB, 666x442)
35 KB PNG
>>539326786
SAAR
>>
So it would it be a regular felony if she was 18?
>>
>>539329907
it's not ok in all of europe either, even when the age of consent is like 15
>>
>>539326943
making porn of someone and showing it to other people isn't ok, no matter how you present it
>>
>>539326884
You worship a paedophile who is orange (and you're brown)
>>
>>539334416
yes but thats not the crime he was charged with
>>
File: download.jpg (206 KB, 1302x976)
206 KB JPG
>Boss makes AI porn of teen employee; showed it to other coworkers
Clever.
>>
>>539326636
Pornography ruined everything
>>
>>539335764
Yeah.
>>
File: 1784313774873719.jpg (37 KB, 498x490)
37 KB JPG
>>539326636
>C P
>her boss
>>
>>539326759
omb, it just sounds very much like it, heh
>>
>>539326636
Kek, what a fucking looser.
>>
can someone point me to the crime in this case? this guy's bail is higher than the pedos who showed up in to catch a predator
>>
>>539326636
Is he retarded?
>>
>37
why do look millennials look so young?
>>
>>539328596
>Children cannot consent to sex.
Can they consent to sex-change?
>>
File: 1000170708.jpg (73 KB, 679x762)
73 KB JPG
>>539329064
IT'S A PERSON OKAY
abortion is wicked and devilish. Just a baby
>>
>>539326636
always arrest faggot snitches instead.
>I'm telllllllling on youuuu!
>>
>>539326846
She was 17 years 364 days, 23 hours and 59 minutes old you sick fuck!
>>
>>539326636
>17 years old non virgin whore
>child
Fuck off murricans
>>
>>539326636
>showed it to other coworkers
cant help himself
>>
>>539326636
ultimately a victimless crime. what's next, prosecuting men who beat off to mental images of their 17 year old employees?
>>
>>539326636
Why didn’t they bust him for employing a literal child? Actual child labor is okay but fake AI images aren’t?
>>
>>539338201
AI firms over the last two years have been aggressively lobbying state governments to introduce legislation that imposes extremely heavy penalties for any sex crimes that involve AI. This is because AI firms know invariably that their AI tools will be used by perverts. AI firms do not want unflattering news articles to come out that say "such and such sex criminal used (name brand) AI to generate perverse filth" and cause a moral panic among the public. AI firms need to generate good press and avoid bad press right now. Their solution, it would seem, is to make sure any sex pest caught using AI in unsavory ways is always given a severe penalty and very public trial, that way the "facebook moms" dont get upset and start protesting "such and such" AI firm on social media. We can imagine a scenario where an angry facebook mom uproar occurs on social media if, lets say, a story broke out that a sex pest was using a particular AI to do unsavory things and he was only lightly sentenced with something like community service. AI firms need their stock price to remain high, which means avoiding scandals.

Much of the world economy currently depends on AI firms avoiding scandals in the press- as stupid as it seems, this is presently the case.
>>
>>539326759
the name sounds just like falling
because faling sounds like falling
even the way you say it
when you speak and words come out.
(but also the way you think it, too!)
>>
>>539335906
that's just wha I said!
I said it right here!
>>539340268

I linked it so you can read it.
(I thought you might like it.)
(Im not so sure if I like it but I sent it to you anyway.)
Actually I am sending it right now! I am still typing this. (Not anymore!)
>>
>>539326846
maybe the co-worker was a stupid fucking obnoxious little bitchy cunt
>>
>>539326636
How old was the AI?
>>
File: maybe_she_deserved_it.gif (315 KB, 600x300)
315 KB GIF
>>539327061
>>539326636
>>
File: 1784246327833232m.jpg (104 KB, 965x1024)
104 KB JPG
>>539326698
Umm...sweety?
>>
>>539326636
How fried does your brain have to be to ignore the uncountable quantity of porn freely available on the internet to not only corrupt the image of your employee that you are stewarding but to reveal that corruption to her and your other colleagues?
>>
>>539328557
he's a danger to pixels
>>
>>539328613
What we need is a fucking king
>>
File: 1777671909941630.jpg (39 KB, 604x354)
39 KB JPG
>>539326636
>child sexual abuse
>child
>17 year old

Jesus christ I'm tired of this.
>>
>>539326636
Man, what an idiot
>>
>>539326636
Well what about all those who programmed the AI to even be able to obey the "Create Child Porn" prompt?

OY VEY
>>
File: 1526731832994.jpg (85 KB, 761x681)
85 KB JPG
>>539326846
>>539326636
Sam Hyde's done worse.
>>
>>539327211

every time I see a reply from Romania it is one of the most based replies ever. Thank you for your service
>>
>>539329077
>>539328836
KYS RIGHT NOW
do it for the better
do it for the good.
DO it right
NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW
>>
>>539341284
It's boomers creating outrage over anything that takes attention away from them, allowing Jews to destroy the economy.
>>
File: npr.brightspotcdn.jpg (124 KB, 880x587)
124 KB JPG
>>539331109
ANON this is a fucking senator
>>
>>539326636
Why would you show it to other people? These people are fucking terminally retarded and deserve everything they get.
>>
>>539326942
Still child porn if under18
>>
>>539326636
>17-years old
>child

Pure jew clown world.
>>
Who was hurt by his actions?
>>
>>539329148
In India kids are married off to kids which is unironically based.
>>
>>539327269
Or we could punish the people who break society's laws with our bright new shiny toys.
Do not exceed the posted speed limit, Anon.
>>
>>539328596
Not actually true. Sixteen year olds can consent to sex. They can't however consent to sex work, including pornography. Get your facts straight.
>>
Was this fucker really making CHILD PORN of a wittle baby toddler 17 year old girl? She's still in fucking diapers.

Lock this demon up for life.
>>
>>539334303
Revenge porn law would kick, I imagine.
>>
I'm not sure if AI porn is really worthy of being a crime...
>>
>>539326698
Simply as, he’s probably another Migger. Runs rampant in cuckservatives circles.
>>
>>539342186
if she made AI beastiality porn and sent it to his family and boss it wouldn't constitute harassment
>>
>>539326636
Bad decision making, but fake AI porn of a 17yo getting you jail time? Come on man. Retards like Ted Cruz voted for this
>>
>Be American
>Write a prompt
>AI fucks up the result
>You're now in jail for life

lol
>>
>>539326846
> 17
What a sick fuck. Literally an embryo
>>
>>539326636
What's the crime, exactly? The guy generated some naked images of her and that somehow deserves a prison sentence? At most you could argue this is a harassment case because he was showing those images to other people. In a sane world he'd pay a small fine and that would be it, but we don't live in a sane world. It makes no sense to equate possession of AI generated content to actual chinese pepperoni. AI generated shit is no different from drawing pictures yourself, and this act has no victims and no harm is done to anyone. It's also no different from imagining things in your head and then describing them to other people. Literally same shit. None of it is real and didn't actually happen, and is purely imaginative in nature. Right now government is punishing people for thought crime. It's horrible that people have their lives ruined because lawmakers are lazy, overpaid queers who can't be arsed to come up with new laws to address these emerging problems.
>>
File: ElderScrollsBahrat.mp4 (3.13 MB, 320x240)
3.13 MB
3.13 MB MP4
>>539326786
>>
>>539331870
you'll do nothing cuck, your daughter will get raped by shitskins instead and you'll do nothing about that, bitch.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.