On balance, was Rome a good thing for whites?
they werent whitesthe lombards took one for the team assimilating them
>>539377801They did occupy a large part of europe though so had a huge impact on the history of white civilization. Up to WW1 practically every major country in Europe was larping as the successor state to Rome.
>>539378639you might as well be asking persia or russia to take all the globohomo migrants and jews on account of being civilized
>>539377361Hell yeah. Only ass mad germanics would think otherwise>inb4 dey romans wuz nordic
>>539377361Didn't see whites cared so much about killing each other to the last one back then.
>>539379237Romans were White but they weren't Nordic White.
>>539377361Yes. But than the Barbaric Whites ruined it, since they enjoy Brother Wars
>>539377361The retarded concept of whiteness didn't exist in Rome. They considered themselves a separate race from Greeks, Celts, Germanics, Carthagenians, Pontics, and Persians who they considered separate races as well and vice versa.
>>539377361Pajeets spamming AI-slop sure as shit werent.
>>539377361Whenn ROME. reached the "superior" whites tthey were shocked because they were living iin wood mudhutsLOOL
>>539377361>On balance, was Rome a good thing for whites?Well we didn't have a written language in Britain until the Romans arrived, Ironically we're still using much of it to this day
>>539380679The Romans were White themselves. Look at the statues. Literally the same facial features and hair type as White people.
>>539377361Race is a social construct. whites were not a thing in the Roman empire, dipshit
>>539381116US larping as europeans will neverr not be funny, you ruined the worldYou ddontt even kknow. wtf is whhite. anyway, feell for thhe anglo. Psyop
only italians and greeks can claim to be romans
>>539380679Rome may have been more advanced than northern Europe in many areas. But the important thing is, we were inspired. We watched, listened, and learned.
>>539381305White is what ever facial features and hair match that of the Roman statues.
>>539377361empire is always bad for the race as a whole, but there's nothing anyone can do about it because what you're going to ask the romans to sacrifice themselves on the alter of the white race? get real. Of course, the romans suffered too, but much later in time. Any divergence from one nation, one people, one government is going to end up being bad, because the multicultural interests are divisions that are exploited by the government itself for its own survival, at their expense.
>>539381116Romans were OLIVES, white piece of shit.Just because TWO MILLENNIA washed away the over abundance of pigments on the white marble, a rainbow that is not even surpassed by Africans playing with all colors, doesn't mean the Romans looked like you. NOTHING about Hellenics, Latinos, or Hispanics make me think, "this guy is a baby-killing land-stealing barbarian/chalk/gringo".You're the subhuman trash behind the support of the (((SMITHSONIAN))) using jewish CGI to make Romans with CURLY HAIR look like pale skinned faggots with straight hair. You whites steal other people's history to justify your genocides and theft. America without the white race was heaven, with the Habsburgs, Inca, and Montezuma families doing little except let America create wealth for all of humanity.
>>539377361Romans should have exterminated the white race in Europe... Europe belongs to the OLIVE RACE.
>>539381690okay but you're actually just a syrian rape babby from like 200 AD
>>539377361If Rome didn't exist Europe would be filled with semites and asiatics.So yes.
>>539380679>spend 40,000 years grinding IQ, strength, and height in a frozen shithole>swarthy manlets attack you for hundreds of years, minor inconvenience>eventually invade them, occupy their civilization and steal their tech>immediately improve it beyond the scope of their wildest imagination>literally have machine guns and planes while 90% of the world is in the iron agenorthern european supremacy
>>539381889It would be full of celts, germanics hand in hand speaking in their unadulterated tongues singing together and worshipping the gods of their forefathers
>>539377361I don't know much about what the Romans did in ancient Britain but I know they didn't flood my ancestors villages with Africans. And no Roman ever called any ancestor of mine a goy.
>>539382255Shit bait fatty
I think they are a little too early to be in the AOE2 roster honestly.
>>539382341There were celts and germanics that still existed and worshipped their original faith at the end of Rome.Rome romanized a lot of them and brought christianity, but they also prevented the semitic carthaginians from expanding even further and stopped the brunt of the hunnic invasion. A Europe without Rome would trace their roots back to carthaginians and huns.
>>539381367Fuck off, anglonigger
>>539381655Maybe light olive at best, they were only dark because of a tan. All the romans that moved to britian would have had white skin from the less than sunny climates.
>>539382255>have to give meds money>have to give meds food>have to give meds tech>we wuz romans and shiet
>>539382863:o)
>>539381655
>>539377361They didn't finish the job in 70AD.
>>539377361They enslaved/killed more europeans and their own people than the contrary, so yes, they are good for whites
>>539382430they could have flooded the village with syrians though
>>539377361>On balanceMillions must go and you are one of them, Ahmed
>>539377361Considering they kicked off the dissolution of traditional European religions in favor of Christianity, no.
>>539377361ISREAL MUST BE DESTROYED
>>539385913Exactly. Without Constantine Islam would never come into existence and Judaism would be just another regional desert cult instead of enjoying its privileged position elevated by Christianity.
>>539377361European rulers from Charlamagne to your own monarchs have seen fit to LARP as Romans and aspire to greatness. You tell me.
>>539386010Islam or something very like it could have very well come into existence without Christianity. Islam is just lower IQ Judaism for Arabs, it's entirely culturally semitic and entirely rooted in the philosophical assumptions of semites. Islam has practically nothing in common with Christianity on a purely theological level.
>>539386216Yes and no. Islam is a mix of scripture, extra-canonical debates and folk tales of Christianity, Judaism and Arab polytheism. It's not entirely Semitic as Christianity is mainly Greek in its philosophical roots, dressed up in Semitic clothing. I agree that something else could have come up to unify the Arab tribes, but the fact that it's a monotheistic religion is very important for getting people to convert. A Bedouin wouldn't give up Astarte or Baal for Minerva, but you tell him there's only one true god who is the creator of the entire universe and he's more likely to reconsider. Additionally the fact that Islam is in direct opposition to Christianity, the religion of the Romans, provides the Muhammadens with a natural enemy and a reason to fight them. To the Muhammadens, believing in the divinity of Jesus is the worst sin possible and they have also painted the Romans as the murderers of a prophet of Allah. You take that away and I doubt the Arabs and the Turks would have been so fervent in their conquest and utter desolation of Christian lands.
>>539386010>and Judaism would be just another regional desert cultjudaism was a dominant religion before Christianity. The carthaginians and phoenicians, two rivals that fell to Rome, had near full control of northern africa and iberia. Without Rome it wouldn't be a "desert cult". The carthaginians would've taken over Italy as they had attempted to do, then spread north while the phoenicians would've spread their influence through anatolia. judaism would cease to be a "desert cult", it would've become the Christianity of our world.
>>539380679>Majapahit empireLole
