If I was a drug dealder I'd be annoyed with these cameras, for sure.
>>539395355or one of them terroristsjust kidding, it's over, the stupid & greedy won
>>539395355Flock is gang stocking. It will be easy to shut them down in Court. You’re not allowed to spy on people even if the city gives permission. It’s still a violation of our civil rights and privacy. I do have something to hide. And so do you it’s your right to have privacy.
>>539395355It's not for drug dealers
>>539395607That's exactly what a communist drug dealer would say.
>>539395355You can look around and see where they are, they're pretty visible. If you're up to no good and have half a brain you can stay out of the field of view.They're really about tracking everyone who isn't a criminal.
>>539395355>Implying these things get used to bust drug dealers in an anrcho-tyrannical system>Having a Glock with a fun switch on you as a drug dealer is just common sense, but having a glock with a switch as a regular citizen is a federal crime for which you must be jailed for 12 years.All of this shit would be okay if the good guys were in charge of the government, sadly they are not.
>>539395355If I were just anybody I would be annoyed by those cameras
>>539395355If I was a libertarian, I would be too.Oh, wait! I am!
>>539395549This is true
>>539396062>I too love the cyberpunk dystopia panopticon if le good guys did it for my safety Offcourse
>>539395355Unless I was black or brown. In that case it wouldn’t matter because I’d get away with it anyway. These are for innocent white people who consume only, so their data, travel information, shopping habits can all be tracked. You spent 39 seconds next to a McDonald’s in your commute home today, so I McDonald’s ads for the item that was being advertised at that specific McDonald’s will also be pushed onto your phone for the next 48 hours until you either buy it or something similar. Either way it wouldn’t be your choice
>>539395355any criminal is going to think twice now before commiting crimes. a little less privacy is not a big price to pay in exchange for saving someones life or preventing a rape or burglary. anyone saying otherwise is an uncivilized brown third worlder. white people have nothing to hide so we have no problem with safety measures to make our lives safer
>>539395549But Mr. Lambright, thinking machines are now executing every action on this planet, and all inputs are logged, all personal devices, and the coffee shop payment. So it seems it is quite easy to constantly target the first movers so no opposition can form again. I haven't seen a revolution that wasn't paid for by rich international factions in decades, even before the surveillance nightmare society of the 2000s arrived. The methods of subconscious control and marginal cost of action entrapment are too good now.
>>539396206Most rapes take place inside the home so i guess we would have to put up cameras in there aswell, but as long as you just have consensual sex you should have no problems with it
>>539395940Nobody cares what Germans have to say anymore especially after your humiliating lose at the fucking fairy bowl.
>>539396323the camera will deter the rapist from entering your home
How is this any different from cameras set up for businesses? I already hated that.
>>539396653Groups of people don't form collective ideas dealing with business networks.>x small cameras -> y data providers -> z profiling corporationsThat's not what the collective of humans can understand.Was like this 30 years ago, but now, algorithms stop everything of power against elites early.
>>539395549Flock is Jewish.And I am Jewish.Pax Judaica.
