What should be the limits of lawful self-defense?Current laws try to strike a balance between preserving the rights of the victim and those of his attacker. Yet assault, regardless of how petty/inconsequential it may seem, is still a crime. Is it valid for a criminal to claim protection of the rights that he's denied in his victim, or does his crime place him outside the protection of the laws that are intended to protect them?
>>539452502total kike death should be the limit
>>539452502committing crimes is illegal
>>539452502If you attack so.eone, you do t have any rights.What the fuck is wrong with you people?Do you have such niggerishly low impulse control that you cant refrain from initiated violent situations?If you are afraid of someone killing you in self defense, the problem is you.Get help.
you should be allowed to kill someone if they touch you, but you have to say 'i feared for my life' afterward
>>539452539This. More of this. They want us dead. They don't see us as humans. They can't wait to be in power so that they can torture us. Don't ever hesitate in a situation with them because they can't understand honor or justice. Only lies and deceit and what they want. Literal demon possessed human "beings".
>>539452502I should be allowed to legally execute anyone who even mildly irritates me.
>>539452502>What should be the limits of lawful self-defense?If they steal your belongings you can blow up their house.
I see that this thread is attracting some trolls and edgelords but let's try to have some reasonable discussion about the actual topic for once.
>>539452619Ethnic cleansing should be a crime, until I do it.
Disappointing thread. Maybe it's the time; it's about noon in India ATM. I'll rebake once more whites are online.
>>539452502If someone steals your junk from your backyard and you shoot them it's not self defense.
>>539452502You should be able to shoot anybody who is not white.
>>539456016What if they steal something that's not junk from your backyard?What if they steal it, junk or otherwise, from inside your house?
>>539452539FPBP
>>539453055lmao this
>>539456099Then you call cops and report your stolen items.
>>539456340The cops won't get it back for you.
>>539456340Is that what you should do for both cases that I asked about?Is there any situation where someone attempting to steal something from anywhere on your property may be justified with lethal force?
>>539456099>>539456340>implying that it is ok for you to allow criminals to steal stuff outside your houseAre you by any chance a Pirate?
>>539456340>Yo piggas, some crackhead stole 14 of my bullets and now he's just lying there and won't give them back
>>539456508I wouldn't. Don't want to go jail.
>>539456592I implied no such thing; I was just asking about when lethal force is justified.This has strayed a little bit from my initial question regarding self-defense, but then again you could argue that your body is no less and no more than your own property and that your other property may be defended with equal force.
>>539456681The point of this thread is about what laws should be rather than what they are.
>>539452502Frontier Justice. Hollywood version.I can kill a nigger who tried to steal the catalytic converter of my car by shooting him in the back running away. In a perfect world the police are scaled back and the Sheriff once again becomes the de facto law enforcement. Court system reformed so criminal trials aren't as complex and expensive. If the local jury finds the criminal nigger was criminal niggering case closed.
>preserve rights>of the attackerpost nose schlomo. hopefully some sandnigger rapes your entire family to death
>>539456918I didn't write these laws, I'm only explaining them. Since it's apparently clear on where you stand on this issue, could you elaborate?
>>539452502>Is it valid for a criminal to claim protection of the rights that he's denied in his victim, or does his crime place him outside the protection of the laws that are intended to protect them?You assume it is already settled that he's a criminal at that point as if a whole juridical process had established thatThe reality is a feral nigger in your home.You have no time for deliberation, only actionPracticing philosophy in your head at that point is straight up cowardice!And the 20-20 hind sight judgment of the judge and jury is to be treated as sports commentary from that pointInaction, not using force to end the threat ought to be condemned as immoral and punished
>>539452502mines
If you have to break through door that are not on your possession just to shoot someone. There's where I paint the line of self defence
>>539456967>Since it's apparently clear on where you stand on this issue, could you elaborate?you're a subhuman aren't you? post nose with timestamp
>>539457824I don't mean to suggest any particular course of action in response to assault or any other crime. I'm talking about law.I infer that you mean that lethal force is justified in response to any criminal behavior. Fair enough. Would you then say that shooting someone for aggressively shoving you is lawful self-defense? After all he did assault you.
>>539452502once you've crossed someone, you should be completely at their mercy and it should be totally legal to publicly torture them to death if you want to. especially if they're just a nigger.
>>539457940I guess you're posting in multiple threads and forgot to change your flag, which probably means you're a troll/shill. Anyway, I'm only asking for an elaboration on your philosophy. I've made no declaration of my own.
