[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Caucuses.jpg (175 KB, 1260x1441)
175 KB JPG
>Red Star
Maoist/Stalinist (or at least their site recommends readings from both to new socialists)
>Libertarian Socialist
anarchist
>Springs of Revolution
Marxist-Leninist, extreme emphasis on Palestine and global revolution
>Reform & Revolution: Trotskyist
>Marxist Unity Group
Leninism with a rehabilitation of Kautsky, dissenting from Lenin’s strong dislike of him
>Bread and Roses
Grassroots Marxism, anti-vanguardism
>Carnation
Marxist but firm belief in achieving a handful of basic milestones in democratic politics in order to tighten focus and actually gain credibility for a revolutionary working class
>Groundwork
Social democracy, extreme emphasis on climate change
>Socialist Majority
Reformist
>>
Why wouldn't I vote for the accelerationist option knowing full well they'll only make shit worse?
>>
>>539482941
>National Political Committee
>NPC
>>
two trots form a communist party, the other day there are three splinters
>>
File: 1783110576591834.png (678 KB, 2580x1578)
678 KB PNG
>>539482941
so its true Communists of Red Star vs Bougie faggots larping
>>
/pol/ is now an openly marxist board
>>
This DSA seems like it didn't exist until two weeks ago but it's got miggers seething and shitting themselves.
>>
>>539483238
I mean bro, the entire intention of Soros flooding the west with browns was to redistribute global wealth and establish a brown communist alliance like this.
This is the culmination of his work
>>
>>539484481
and?
>>
>>539484568
There was a communist coup in 2025 of the DSA in the same vote that expelled Zionists
>>
>>539484660
With all fairness to Soros he said he hated living under communism and strongly preferred Nazi rule
>>
>>539484568
>This DSA seems like it didn't exist until two weeks ago
It was more like 10 months ago.
>>
>>539484915
Sounds pretty fucking based.
All this shidding and farding about this party that has sprung up from nothing yet I haven't actually read a single bad thing.
>>
> Socialist Majority
> 4 out of 27 seats in a splinter group
This word, I do not think it means what you think it means
>>
>>539482941
Bread and Roses are mostly ex-trots with a strong focus on labor organizing. They are centrists and the deciding vote on most issues.

The DSA right has been misunderstood by a lot of recent mainstream reporting. They are popular front CPUSA types, which means they are less concerned with internal democracy than the left wing caucuses, and are more populist and open to working in coalitions with liberals.

>>539485452
Majority as in Bolshevik. They don't like to openly identify as communists, but they still believe they are.
>>
>>539485635
Also SoR isn't Marxist-Leninist.
>>
>>539485452
They’re called that because they favor achieving socialism through majority vote. Both AOC and Bernie Sanders are part of that group
>>
>>539486040
They reference Marx and Engels in their criticism of AOC in exactly the same way Lenin referenced them in his criticism of non-revolutionaries and use his terminology
>>
>>539485218
Marxism seems based?
>>
>>539486168
Bernie isn't a DSA member. AOC is not a member of any caucus, and predates most of them. The "right wing" caucuses are their strongest supporters though.

>>539486319
Citing Lenin doesn't make you a Marxist-Leninist, most caucuses across the spectrum will cite him.
>>
>>539487174
Using Lenin as an authority for your values and politics makes you a Leninist in some respect lil brobro
>>
>>539486168
AOC and Sanders are both social democrats rather than actual socialists. SocDems favour a gradualist approach, reforms though taxes and transfers. Real Democratic Socialists believe that socialism can be achieved through democracy, but also go further than SocDems in the sense they believe in owning the means of production and exchange. The difference is slight, but very real.

In practice, however, neither Social Democracy or Democratic Socialism exists because both overlap as identity politics is the real glue of American politics now.
>>
>>539487454
Socialist majority are social democrats who believe socialism can be achieved by a socialist majority of the population
>>
>>539487596
AOC and Sanders are social democrats, not demsocs. Mamdani is a demsoc, though
>>
>>539487659
The party or group is called DSA and AOC is in it and got elected with their help. They did withdraw their endorsement of her but she is obviously trying to win it back because she recently got questioned if the DSA are communists and she just kept saying it is a free country it is a free country. And she also reversed her position on the iron dome. So it is clear she is pushing to get their endorsement back which is currently being blocked by the Leninists
>>
>>539487265
no it doesn’t. you just think you’re smarter than other people so make up rules in your head other people have to follow to not offend your sensibilities.
>>
>>539487950
That’s pretty rich coming from a Leninist
>>
>>539487265
Marxist-Leninism is a specific formulation created by Stalin. It's what "Stalinists" call themselves. Every caucus except arguably LSC will meet your definition of Leninist.
>>
>>539487454
Talk about the policy of infusion.
>>
>>539488306
Marxism-Leninism is Lenin’s reading of Marx in contrasted with the German reading at the time, and later in contrast with western Marxism. Trotskyism, Stalinism, Maoism and Hoxhaism are all forms of it
>>
>>539488433
fine troll, but too niche for this place.
>>
>>539486956
Compared to paedophile politicians and endless wars for Israel? Yeah, seems pretty based.
>>
>>539488536
It’s only “trolling” to you because you are hyper autistic. Which all Marxists are because it’s a religion to them, like Christians who say, “no, in one nature! The filioque!”
>>
>>539488545
As a democratic socialist marxism is fundamentally incompatible with my beliefs. I do not support marxism. Perhaps you would find the green party more "entertaining" instead.
>>
>>539488694
Marxists couped your group in 2025.
>>
File: 1774825178102343.png (39 KB, 386x309)
39 KB PNG
>>539482941
>3 out of 27 are stalinist
So its completely fake and gay and controlled opposition?
>>
>>539488859
You're delusional
>>
File: Nothing Democratic.png (1.04 MB, 1260x2384)
1.04 MB PNG
>>539489064
>The writer and activist Michael Harrington helped found the DSA in 1982. His goal was to build a socialist movement that would eventually pull the Democratic Party toward more humane domestic and foreign policies. He believed that a commitment to freedom of speech, elections, and other democratic norms was an absolute requirement for any socialist organization. And generations of bitter experience taught Harrington and his allies that socialist organizations had failed because they allowed communists to infiltrate them and take control of their organizing structures. Its founding bylaws accordingly permitted the expulsion of members who were “under the discipline of any self-defined democratic-centralist organization,” a slightly jargonish way of describing communists.

>Militant anti-Zionism became a wedge that the group’s more radical activists used to drive away critics of authoritarianism on the left. In 2025, the group’s convention voted to officially remove its founding language allowing for the expulsion of members who worked for communist cells, and added a provision calling the Palestinian “right to resistance” a central tenet of the DSA. Having dismantled the guardrails that Harrington built to exclude communists, the group established new guardrails to exclude anybody opposed to Israel’s destruction. “Michael Harrington’s DSA is dead,” a dispatch from the proceedings gloated.

>The DSA’s Red Star caucus was formed the year after the North Star caucus, in an apparent rebuke. It writes that nearly half of the members of the National Political Committee, the DSA’s highest leadership body, “openly identify as communists.”
>>
>>539488869
If you believe some SMC members, it's really 0/27.

https://www.socialistmajority.com/theagitator/red-star-or-how-we-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-vanguard?rq=lenin

>Their PoU are, aside from its own contradictions and cynicism, not even Leninist. As Lenin said, referring to abstracted, intellectual posturing in the face of serious, demanding realities, “politics begin where millions of men and women are; where there are not thousands, but millions, that is where serious politics begin.” Let’s not quit when we’ve only just begun.
>>
>>539489313
Castro gained power with a lot less than millions and DSA wants to turn America into Cuba
>>
File: GvMBhvXW4AA-LOc.jpg (1.2 MB, 2590x2000)
1.2 MB JPG
>>539482941
Slightly outdated caucus history infographic. Membership is now 120,000.
>>
>>539490266
RnR and SoR are big now.
>>
>>539482941
These people need to be fucking tortured to death on live television.
>>
>>539490266
North Star got obliterated
>>
>>539490486
Vote GOP, it’s your best bet
>>
>>539490567
North Star was post-obliteration. The Harringtonites were anti-caucus, and only reluctantly formed their own after losing most of their power.
>>
>>539488694
You find Epsteinocracy preferable?
>>
>>539482941
All I see are Technocrats. Eww
>>
>>539483238
Because you may end up living in South Africa.
>>539483555
Kek'd and checked.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.