Now that the dust has settled, who was in the wrong here? >tl;dr a nig was arrested for calling somebody a crackerShould it be illegal to call somebody cracker?
>>539531076>a nigger was arrestedGood. Case closed
>>539531076Obstructing police as a physical act you cannot be charged with obstructing police verbally that's not a thing. Either the AI is retarded or the cop was or both
>>539532969It says charged. Seems like he wasn't convicted.
>>539533101There have been convictions as well. Because niggers have higher rates of this sort of thing, remember my fellow racist?
>>539531076>has a nigger ever been convicted of calling a white person cracker
>>539533198Did the white people scream at them to call them cracker like the nigger did? Kek didnt think so. You dont get to provoke someone to fighting words then cry foul. That's called acting in bad faith. Conviction overturned. Record expunged. Case closed. Whitey won. Niggers lost
