[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


For months now I have been hearing from multiple YouTubers something like, "the US has some really really insane advanced anti drone tech that can destroy drone swarms and it hasnt been revealed or given to the ukrainians yet"
Anyway, thoughts?
>>
>>539540495
bump
>>
>>539540495
nato is saving it for when it's time to take the gloves off
>>
>>539540495
it's bullshit
>>
>>539540641
but multiple people "in the know" have been saying this for months
>>
>>539540602
I think it's time bro...
>>
>>539540495
doesnt exist. if Mutts had this they would have already invaded Iran and crushed Russia.
>>
>>539540495
We've had weird wunderwaffe in the past, like the sonic shit we apparently used in Venezuela. It's entirely plausible that we have ways to shut down drone swarms that we aren't openly deploying yet.
It's possible it's the type of countermeasure that can be overcome with a few months' worth of further drone R&D. Russia-Ukraine has shown that shit keeps accelerating during wartime; now drones are all fiber optic, if you haven't noticed.
If we have something that can basically keep the skies over our soldiers clear for 2-3 months, max, there's absolutely no way we would use it until we need those 2-3 months.
>>
>>539540671
Who?
>>
>>539540814
Military and Foreign Affairs Network
Defense Politics Asia
These are two of the YouTube channels who have been saying this. The first guy is ex US military and talks to people in the military.
>>
>>539540495
There are technology that are 50 years ahead of our own. So anytime a technology comes out in public, they had that technology for 50 years as it is. Nothing is new under the sun.
>>
>>539540812
Even fiber is outdated now. The new thing is radio control with AI for terminal guidance.
>>
>>539540495
The tech is focused on drone SWARMS. These are large numbers of drones who are organizing via wireless communication between the drones. To counter these is childs play:
>jam the frequency
>Spoof commands
>spoof geodata
This of course works great against swarms. However this works for shit against the drones Russia is using because they are all independent.
>Jam signal? Spoof commands or geodata?
Use fiber optic
>use microwave or lasers?
Wrap important parts in copper foil
>enemy targeting C2 nodes?
Disperse them like a million ATGM teams.

There is no counter for modern fiber drones except the almighty shotgun. Every infantry man needs a shotgun.
>>
>>539540495
It's a microwave emitter that emits a wide angle beam in the hopes of overheating drones. You can't use it safely around people and you'd better hope you can overheat the drone in time and are pointing at it when it's coming, because even a single done will destroy it. Glueing a thin foil to the surface of the drone will likely mean only the surface of the drone is heated while also being cooled by the air its moving through.
>>
>>539541485
Doesnt work on the ukranian battlefield. The issue is radio gives away your transmitters position and in short order you have 152mm shells raining on your head. In most cases for the “AI” drones they are sent to an area like a cruise missile whereupon they search for a target. It is NOT targeted and really only useful for attacking rear logistics.
>>
>>539540495
>"the US has some really really insane advanced anti drone tech that can destroy drone swarms and it hasnt been revealed or given to the ukrainians yet"

lmao, sure, and Trump goes on twitter demanding the strait to be opened every day for fun

holy shit the absolute state of you people
>>
>>539541895
>Trump goes on twitter demanding the strait to be opened every day for fun
kekd
>>
>>539540495
The US literally pulled their navy away from Iran because of the threat of lawn mower-powered drones.
>>
>>539541752
Also dont forget that lighting up a giant microwave source instantly reveals your position to radar and the ruskies will drop hundreds of artillery shells on you within 2 minutes.

Lasers and microwave weapons are easy to defend against ANd reveal your position. Pants on head retarded.
>>
Machinegun with fast gimbal and camera guidance plus fire control, track and shoot tiny drones with bursts of automatic fire.

Light enough to move by hand or mount on a light vehicle. Variations can be mounted to infantry weapons.

It's not a complete solution, it's vulnerable to artillery, probably has trouble with aiming vertical, probably not totally safe around friendly forces, probably doesn't work perfectly in complex environments like forests and cities. It's probably also more expensive than the drone that can kill it once it's located.

Giant acoustic/magnetic sensor nets cueing incoming drones, combined with preemplaced hunter drones might also help.

These are not complete solutions, you don't snap your fingers and win.
>>
File: 1589485021047.jpg (51 KB, 680x870)
51 KB JPG
>>539541485
>Even fiber is outdated now
That doesn't surprise me. They had advantages but my God, the aftermath of the miles and miles of fiber across the countryside couldn't possibly be good; some of the forest areas I saw in video footage looked like giant spiders had nested, except it's made of toxic shit. They're deploying this shit over arable land, thousands of tons of it per year, and it's going to fuck up agriculture for the next several decades.
Even if the war ended tomorrow and they spent the next five years focusing on nothing but that, they're never going to get it all, and that's the kind of shit that will get pulverized and mixed deep into the soil every planting season. Horrifying, because the whole region is a HUGE producer of wheat and fertilizer.
>Note the fertilizer crisis in India, which would not be happening without Russia/Ukraine
I fucking hate geopolitics
>>539541879
This is what I figured was happening.
Are they actually using AI drones, though? Ones that target directly? Or AI for glided flight to an area and then operated manually? Is AI actually pulling triggers now?
>>
>>539545400
They arent manually controlled. ALL manual controls are jammable EXCePt Fiber. They are fire and forget weapons. You lob them to a target area it finds a vehicle and blows it up. These are NOT front line targeting drones but rear logistics.

Fiber optics are STILL the kings of the front line +10km.
>>
>>539547438
Makes me wonder if there are "Snake" drones.
Basially a drone being connected through fiber to 10 others to extend the range and avoid the possibility of failure by cutting wire since communication would just be rewired to another.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.