Poll for /pol/. Choose:A) Protect Israel and be powerless to change their lobbyists, by funding forever wars for Greator IsraelB) Protect Israel by creating a 51st Holy State on Jeruselum, it's simply another American state, Left-Wing prevent genocide, get to protest, and stop forever wars against innocent muslim citizens. Right-Wing finally get to live on the holyland of Christ, they get to finalize the Crusade mission of stepping foot on the holyland permanently, they get to spread Jesus's peacemaking by stopping the forever conflict between Jews/Muslims, and the money is no longer seen as stolen by lobbyists, but as an investment for citizens. Hypothetically, let's assume America will never stop supporting Israel because it believes Israel would be destroyed without US backing, and because no politician is willing or able to reverse that policy. If that's inevitable, and Greater Israel is eventually pursued, wouldn't it be smarter for America to stop funding forever wars and instead invest billions into creating a neutral third state in the Israel/Palestine region as a permanent buffer? It could protect Israel, protect innocent Palestinians, reduce conflict, and create a democratic, multicultural state in the Holy Land.The proposal is simple: if Israel refuses, America withdraws financial support; if neighbouring Muslim states refuse, America continues backing Israel. **TL;DR:** If America is going to support Israel regardless, is it smarter to keep investing in Greater Israel, or invest in a neutral "51st Holy State" that aims to secure peace for both sides? Genuine thoughts? Thanks, /pol/.Wouldn't this be the most based solution?
>>539573643C) Confiscate the wealth of every jew on the planet and deport them all to the ruins of the Gaza strip. Build a 40ft concrete wall around the city and film them killing and eating each other. When it's over, erase judaism from the history books.
D) Thermonuclear War
>>539573643C) nuke israel
