Imagine the bitching on/pol/ when President AOC does the same thing to flyover CHUD states.
>>539586005>precedent to set?>flagYou set it...now LOVE EQUITY.
She'll shut this fucking racist clown of a board down HAHAHA
Democrats already did punitive dumb shit to red states. "Imagine if the roles were reversed" is a dead loser political take at this point desu, nobody respects the argument.
>>539586005>CHUDGet some new material faggot. Your stupid fucking word is so played out.
>>539586005*looks under the hood*>Oh that's why they aren't supporting our president
Biden did it with FEMA. Democrat's obsession with free public services and socialism in cities does absolutely nothing for the Republicans living in small towns and rural areas, besides raise their taxes. Both parties exist to serve their own interests, neither is your friend.
>>539586927Erm rural areas consume way more than they furnish in taxes. Cities provide the revenue
>>539586223I'm sure you have plenty of examples to back this up?
>>539586005The precedent was set by obongo
>>539586927Biden wasted FEMA aide and that’s why it didn’t help red states during the flood.
>>539586927Conservatives love to say this when their favorite kike lover is kike loving publicly.>errrrr well it’s both sides that are evil. MAGA thoughYou are a kike love. Get that through your little migger ears
>>539588189This>Its ok when we do it
>>539588137You'd just deny them or "whatabout" or "yabut" and refuse to engage. Why even bother with the charade at all?
>>539586005
Hey, chat, is this real?
>>539586927Rural areas are already tax money sinks.
The political climate in the US is pure shit, the kind of shit before a civil warInstead of seeing fellow countrymen with different political ideas each side only sees internal enemies I'd stock up if I were an amerilard
>>539588332>I dont actually
>>539588762You lost tranny.
>>539586005That's the price we pay for being so divided
>Accuses Biden Admin of something>Does the same thing when he's in charge.Are we really surprised?
>>539588762Case in point.
>>539588332>and refuse to engageYou are literally refusing to engage based on your strawman imagination of what that anon supposedly would do.>Why even bother with the charade at all?Same question, why bother making a claim if you won't even try to standby it or back it up and just deflect and make excuses?Are you baiting? Hoping someone will just believe you without question?
This is bad because......?
instead of doing petty shit he needs to aggressively attack the pervasive liberal infrastructure in every aspect of the federal government
>>539590107The point op is making is that it might set a precedent of politicizing aid and if Democrats get back in power rather than taking the moral high ground they might do the same and cut aid to conservative areas, which would be even more negatively effected since they generally take more funds in government aid than they contribute in taxes versus liberal areas.Funnily enough in a way it's getting libs on board with cutting some federal government aid programs, a generally conservative position, based on the idea that if Republican administrations are just gonna politically weaponize it then they'd rather not have their taxes go to it and just replace it with state programs.
>>539588137Yes he's referring to how under Obama and Biden, California and New York get less money than they pay in taxes to give welfare to redneck idiots in Texas and Florida
>>539590583That's a pretty unfair oversimplification.Democrats are generally more pro-government-assistance and just the practical realities of rural communities both makes them trend towards conservatism and have many fundamental structural societal challenges that they could use some assistance with.Even when programs aren't specifically focused on these communities they can benefit more from general assistance programs just because they need it more.
