Since the spiritual governs the political and the material, we cannot fully grasp the current stakes—where Talmudic authority guides the actions of its adherents in every domain where they can acquire some power—and the effects of exercising this power are immense when Jews have managed to occupy important and strategic leadership positions, such as in finance, banking, the media, and politics.
From that time onward, the Church was able to rectify the situation, though it could not eradicate Protestantism from the northern half of Europe. With the Counter-Reformation established at the Council of Trent and developing throughout the 17th century, the authority of he magisterium of Talmudic Judaism had secured a public position and established strongholds from which it would be able to advance.

Freemasonry

Its paths of development lay in philosophy (think, in particular, of Spinoza, who influenced subsequent generations all the way to Hegel), Masonic sects, and finance.
In the field of philosophy, specifically, it benefited from the development of a deviant current within traditional philosophy beginning with John Duns Scotus, who, with his postulate of the plurality of forms, dismantled Aristotelian hylomorphism—which ensures the unity of concrete substance, in other words, that which is, namely the natural order of matter and form—conceived as the Aristotelian relationship between potentiality and actuality through a hierarchical order of superimposed forms—which must then be crowned by a completing form that perfects the totality of the composite and unifies its multiplicity; in other words, through the intellectual “invention” of a third element to reconstitute the whole. A complex and distant subject, certainly, but a fundamental one, for through Occam—who found a source of inspiration in it (while disagreeing with Scot on several points)—these materializing ideas made their way through thinkers such as Suárez, Descartes, Kant, Hegel (whose thesis-antithesis-synthesis schema appears, in a certain sense, as the culmination of the distinctions raised by Duns Scotus), and, ultimately, thinkers such as Sartre.
This topic has, of course, only been touched upon briefly at this point.

As for Freemasonry, this sect—which has been divided into several obediences since the 18th century—is based on Anderson’s Constitutions of 1717 and is clearly inspired by the Talmud, if not by Kabbalah.
Let us quote Elie Benamozegh once again: “Those who would undertake the task of carefully examining the relationship between Judaism and philosophical Freemasonry, theosophy, and the mysteries in general would lose some of their haughty disdain for the Kabbalah. They would cease to smile condescendingly at the idea that Kabbalistic theology might have a role to play in the religious evolution of the future.”
It should be noted that the Kabbalah and its foundational text, the Zohar—which are nothing other than the Hebrew expression of Gnosticism—develop the concept of man as a divinity incarnate.
These texts correspond to one of the four levels of Jewish thought: the literal (Torah), the allusive (philosophy), the rigorous (halakha), and the secret (Kabbalah).

total pantheism prevails here: the sensible world is consubstantial with “the thing-in-itself,” meaning that “all is one,” and the soul, preexisting within the great whole, must purify itself through successive reincarnations; in other words, Kabbalah professes Gnostic metempsychosis.
This Kabbalistic “metaphysics” constitutes a major foundation for the spiritual drift that is reaching its peak and is in the process of completely destroying the foundations of European, Western, and Christian societies.
Freemasonry is one of the structures of the Western anti-Christian establishment.

The process has evolved since the 18th century, following a Hegelian-style dialectical pattern in which the concept embodied in this autonomy of reason reveals itself through successive developments marked by oppositions that highlight its contradictions and seek to transcend them.
This autonomy of reason led to the emergence, during the 20th century, of deconstruction, championed in particular by Jacques Derrida, a Jew about whom Pierre Magnard, one of his fellow students, Rue d’Ulm, wrote that he was “exclusively concerned with destroying what he could not appropriate”—in other words, our Christian civilization (Penser, c’est rendre grâce. Le Centurion, 2020, p. 72). This deconstruction is the ultimate stage of that corrosive force that is the principle of the autonomy of reason, which has led to a state where nothing is true anymore, and nothing has any meaning other than the one each individual chooses to give it; contemporary expressions of this include satanic ideologies of gender and all its derivatives, such as same-sex marriage, the LGBT movement, etc.
It should be noted that these amoral practices are, in a sense, foreshadowed by certain passages in the Talmud that legitimize perverse behaviors.

1789 and Its Effects

Without going back as far as the books of Édouard Drumont, *La France juive*, which demonstrated just how much the French Republic was under the sway of political Judaism, the Talmudic component of the French Republic was clearly reaffirmed at a symposium organized on December 9, 2025, by the Ministry of the Interior to celebrate the 120th anniversary of the law separating church and state. On this occasion, former Minister Vincent Peillon declared that “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” originated from the Hebrew Republic and Mosaic Law.
He draws on the work of a liberal rabbi, Louis-Germain Levy—author of a text published in 1904—to demonstrate an intellectual connection between liberal Judaism, secularism, and civic spirit. According to Peillon, secularism is the “religion of the French Republic,” the result of joint reflections by Jews and Freemasons, and inherited from Judaism.
His reasoning is as follows: in the 19th century, progressive circles (including Freemasons) were contemplating a “universal religion.”

In 1860, two alliances were formed: the Universal Israelite Alliance (dedicated to defending Jews worldwide) and the Universal Religious Alliance (a liberal and Masonic initiative in which rabbis participated). According to Peillon, these reflections converge on a single conclusion: the religion we are all seeking—one that unites without dogma—already exists and “is called Judaism” (in its philosophical and emancipatory sense, inspired by Mosaic law).
What more is there to say? It should be noted, however, that this Rabbi Levy hails from the Frankist Kabbalistic sect (named after Jacob Frank, who had indeed officially converted to Catholicism, but only to conquer it from within—just as Sabbatai Levy did in Turkey to infiltrate Islam and establish the Donmeh, a group of Islamized crypto-Jews); that a cousin of Frank’s, Junius Frey, had come to France and joined the Jacobin Club and, before being guillotined in 1794, had published a geopolitical treatise titled *Social Philosophy* incorporating Kabbalistic concepts such as that of the “collective messiah,” which influenced, among others, Ferdinand Buisson, one of the “fathers” of the 1905 law.
It should also be noted that a certain Ernest Hendlé, a Jew and prefect of the Republic by profession, had published as early as 1869 (Ed. Le Chevalier) a book titled *The Separation of Church and State*...

Since the so-called French Revolution was the catalyst for the de-Christianization of Europe, it should come as no surprise to see Macron celebrating Hanukkah at the Élysée Palace or to read the remarks of von der Leyen, the “head” of the EU. Upon receiving her honorary degree from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, she declared, “Europe is the values of the Talmud, the Jewish sense of personal responsibility, justice, and solidarity.”
She reiterated these remarks, in a sense, during the Euro-Hanukkah 2025 celebration in Brussels on September 17, 2025, in the following terms: “No matter how far I have traveled, I have always been convinced of two very simple facts. First, there is no Europe without European Jews. Second, Europe and Israel are destined to be friends and allies [...] For the history of Europe is the history of the Jewish people. For Jewish history is European history. Jewish culture is European culture. And this culture must flourish for Europe to flourish as well.”
That’s how to rewrite history—to write off two thousand years of Christianity as a total loss!

The Secular Arm of Finance

But this authority is supported by a secular arm: that of finance. And here again, the Jewish element is undeniably present and active, if not dominant, given the influence of the Rothschilds and their affiliates, such as J.P. Morgan—which, as Eustace Mullins explains in *The Secrets of the Federal Reserve* (pp. 110 ff.), was founded with capital from the Rothschilds of London, a point to which we will return.
Interest-bearing loans are one of the most effective weapons of world domination. Admittedly, Jews were not the only ones to use them, and the Lombard bankers were fierce users of them. But the Jews understood their full power. Amshel Rothschild, the founder of the dynasty, knew this perfectly well.
Let us quote Maritain once more :

"I will not dwell on the enormous role played by Jewish financiers and Zionists in the political developments of the world during the war (1914–1918) and in the shaping of what is called 'peace.' Hence the obvious necessity of a struggle for the public good against Judeo-Masonic societies and cosmopolitan finance; hence the necessity of a number of general protective measures, which were, to tell the truth, easier to determine at a time when civilization was officially Christian."
The starting point for the rise of Jewish financial power was the establishment in London of Jewish bankers who had come from Amsterdam during Cromwell’s ten years in power between 1649 and 1659; they were introduced through the efforts of Rabbi Manasseh ben Israel, whose story was dramatized by Victor Hugo in 1827 in his play *Cromwell*. Manasseh ben Israel had already championed a policy of rapid integration of Jews in the Netherlands—a policy whose influence permeates Rembrandt’s work—and in 1656, Cromwell de facto accepted crypto-Jews in England before they were legalized under the reign of Charles II, with anti-Catholicism serving as a common ground between Jews and Protestants, as well as a mindset that can be generically described as Talmudic.
Their rise to power was slow but steady.

>>539592847
None of these would have happened if Europeans resisted Palestinian Abrahamic cults, especially Christianity.

Although certain roles or activities were prohibited to them—such as land ownership and colonial trade—the lack of strict enforcement encouraged many Jews to circumvent these restrictive laws: non-naturalized Sephardic merchants could circumvent the Navigation Act by purchasing ships in the names of their English clerks, and those who wished to join the landed nobility began registering their acquisitions in the names of their Christian employees.
On the London Stock Exchange, the profession of stockbroker was open to them without any restrictions, and while, as of 1697, the number of Jewish stockbrokers stood at 12 out of a total of 124, this figure was proportionally very favorable to them at the time, considering that London had a population of around 500,000 in 1700, while the Jewish community numbered barely a thousand souls!
It was the Rothschilds— Nathan Mayer and then his son Lionel Nathan, who made London a central financial hub of the European world, while the Rothschild network—founded by their ancestor Amshel Mayer (posthumously ennobled by Emperor Francis I of Austria in 1817)—spanned Europe from its base in Frankfurt, extending into France, Italy, and Austria.

The Rothschilds were able to finance both sides during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, just as their successors and other associates did during the wars of the 20th century, which illustrates Paul Valéry’s famous phrase: “War is a massacre of people who do not know one another, for the benefit of people who know one another but do not massacre one another.”
Recently, a Rothschild heiress, Hannah Rothschild, stated on the CNBC Meets program on December 13, 2025, that “no government or king during the period 1789–1815 would have considered going to war without the consent of the Rothschilds.”
We refer readers to the numerous works that explain the influence of Jewish financiers over the Western world, particularly during the first half of the 20th century, including the Baruch brothers, Jacob Schiff, Kuehn and Loeb, and their allies or even figureheads (such as J.P. Morgan) from the Protestant banking world—notably the Rockefellers—who were behind the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913 and later the BIS (Bank for International Settlements), the “bank of banks.”
This influence continues to this day through banks such as Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, and Vanguard, among others; Vanguard, due to its shareholders and the fact that it is not publicly traded—and is therefore “invisible”—serves as the central organization of this globalist and stateless financial system.
The influence of this financial system—in which Jews play a major, leading role—constitutes the primary tool enabling the West to extend its influence over the world. Currently, in the 2020s, this influence—fueled by its own arrogance—is facing growing and increasingly organized opposition from “the rest of the world,” which comprises the vast majority of the global population.

The Turning Point of the 20th Century

The power of Anglo-Saxon-style Jewish-Protestant finance enables Talmudic messianism to advance its agenda across the five continents.
But this power is all the greater because in Europe—in this Christian West—the Church’s magisterium, which has been under attack since the Protestant Reformation and shaken, if not undermined, by the philosophy of the Enlightenment, has lost most of its hold by failing to find a way to counter it. And, following a period of conflict that began politically with the upheaval of 1789 in France, the Roman Magisterium lost most of its power after 1950, and the veil concealing its precarious situation was torn away by the Second Vatican Council, which stripped baptized Catholics of their spiritual defenses; the conciliar and post-conciliar Church became “Noah-ized,” encouraging universal apostasy.
During the nineteenth century, however, the Catholic Church did more than merely resist the adversity of the Judeo-Masonic counter-magisterium; for example, in the de-Christianized France of the post-revolutionary era, it spurred a renewal of Catholicism among the population and fostered a powerful and fruitful missionary impulse throughout the world.
Nevertheless, pockets of dechristianization existed, corresponding for the most part to regions affected by Jansenism, that evil which gnawed at France throughout the 18th century, driving the faithful to despair, and whose “ecclesiastical news” served as an insidious poison—nothing other than (so-called) Catholic Protestantism, as evidenced by the fact that the Arnauds were promoters of Jansenism, descendants of converted Protestants.

Above all, the French elites were corrupted, and this was the reason for Algeria’s failure to become Christianized, when Marshal de Bourmont was replaced in the fall of 1830 by Marshal Clauzel, who banned all proselytizing, even though the initial efforts had seemed promising.
Elsewhere in Europe, Christianity held its ground, particularly in Central Europe.
The Austro-Hungarian Empire would serve as its standard-bearer until 1918, while elsewhere Christian monarchies were disappearing—as in Russia and Germany, where they were transformed into “crowned republics.”
In the Roman Church, the worm that threatened to gnaw at it—held in check by the efforts of popes such as Pius IX, whose *Syballus* remains relevant to this day, Leo XIII, and above all Saint Pius X—canonized in 1954—eventually gained momentum during the 20th century and culminated in the Second Vatican Council, which, as “Cardinal” Suenens significantly dubbed it, was “1789 within the Church”; Father Congar, the future “cardinal,” emphasized that at the council “the Church carried out its October Revolution,” and Ratzinger, the future Benedict XVI, confessed that “Vatican II produced an anti-Syllabus.”
Fascist movements in Europe must be viewed, like the Carolingian era, as the last noble attempt to halt this process of destruction of our European civilization.

But they were themselves infected by modernism, and their foundations were both anti-Catholic and Catholic—signs of an era radically marked by profound spiritual destabilization.
Nevertheless, Christianity survived for some time longer in Spain, until the mid-1970s under General Franco, and in Portugal under Salazar’s Estado Novo.
It should be noted that the actions of Jewish emissaries such as Jules Isaac caused the Roman Church (which thereby ceased to be the true Catholic Church) to overturn its traditional doctrine and profess that Jews were the Church’s elder brothers in the faith, as John Paul II declared in 1986, thereby effectively placing Roman Christianity under the control of Talmudic Jews and thus bringing it into the framework of the Noahide Laws.
In response, on March 26, 1991, as part of Education Day, the U.S. Congress adopted a resolution recognizing the Noahide Laws as the foundation of American society: “We turn to education and charity to reorient the world toward the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws.”

Globalist magisterium

The Magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church has thus, in practice, given way to a composite Magisterium whose primary inspiration is Talmudism—which we call the “globalist Magisterium”—insofar as it blends various schools of thought that, although inspired by Talmudic Judaism to varying degrees, have their own distinct identities, such as the Fabian Society, the Rosicrucians, Skull and Bones, and others. In a country like France, it is no longer bishops who shape ideas about societal life, but rather the CRIF, Masonic lodges, and other organizations aligned with these movements, such as SOS Racisme, the LICRA, etc.
In the past, the Catholic Church had enacted laws against blasphemy. Today, these have reappeared in the form of all-too-well-known and burdensome “memorial laws” and anti-racism laws that aim to prevent so-called “free” thought.
Yet it is possible to hurl insults at Christ and the Cross without being disturbed.

Therefore, when we speak of the “West” today, it has nothing in common with the Christian West.
It is a dreadful counterfeit. More than that, it is an absolute negation. When we witness the spread of ideas and ideologies that not only deny the natural order of the world but actively promote its reversal, the term “the West” has today become synonymous with a satanic civilization. Consequently, the peoples of Western Europe can no longer, without risking confusion or a culpable denial of their ancestors, call themselves “Westerners.” We must use another term. Carolingian Europe? Benedictine Europe? Cistercian Europe? The contest is open, for we need a term that is short, meaningful, and easy to remember.
In any case, let us never lose sight of what must be our goal and the meaning of our struggle: to restore the peoples of Europe to themselves. This requires freeing them from the occupation they have endured for far too many decades, knowing that some two centuries of eclipse cannot prevail over more than two millennia of Greco-Roman tradition that became Christian.
André Gandillon (Rivarol N°3693, January 28th, 2026)

File: André Gandillon Grandeu d(...).jpg (411 KB, 1400x2145)

411 KB JPG

Please bump, I spent some time to recopy this text and translate it. Im sorry if there is some mistakes.

Considering how this thread is slided, count on me to spam it regulary.

I second this

File: 1265_Douce_Apocalypse.jpg (164 KB, 1000x796)

164 KB JPG

>>539592847
Bump while I read. Based poster.

>>539596179
Thank you for this brethren in his quest.

My bad for the name, just killed a useless thread.

>>539596225
You forgot about your name, brother.

>>539596269
That's okay, brother.

File: virtues.jpg (469 KB, 914x1206)

469 KB JPG

Stay up

>>539592847
>>539592892
>>539592934
>>539592975
>>539593005
One question that strikes me at this point, is why the Church stopped to attack all those heresies. It was doing so very effectively until the early 1900s, and indeed the spead was rather contained in comparison to today back then. But then entirely stopped, or only did it ambiguously/covertly. Of course, we all know Vatican II is not for nothing here, but there are still traditional elements in the Church, or in branches of the Church, so it doesn't explain everything here.

I think I failed

File: the-riot-or-scene-of-revo(...).jpg (904 KB, 1943x2559)

904 KB JPG

>>539593037
I agree that things lack meaning and truth. People will falsely tell you nothing is right, everything is subjective. If you argue a little bit with them, they will realize their wrong, though. At the same time, they search for meaning in the stupidest of places.

Where it becomes very pernicious IMHO, is if you combine this with the very community and political involvement in our societies, even local. We see clearly how easy it is to control society. People think they vote every few years and they can go back to sleep for a while. In between, nothing else matters, except the few money that they may have or not.

Therefore, I think to change anything, it must first start via local community building, in a community that actually matters. This would gradually bring back meaning as well.

File: Gustave_Dore-Paradiso_Can(...).jpg (211 KB, 858x952)

211 KB JPG

>>539593059
>>539593258
>>539593277
This is of course the core of everything. The travesty of the Republic and the modern world is three fold:
- Material plane: denying historically everything that came before the revolution, whether it's Great Kings, the fact that people were generally happy of their condition, and whatnot.
- Plane of the mind: Denying everything that came before the endarkenment (so called enlightnement) philosophically, the scolastic method for learning, the Christian interepretation of the Greek thinkers, the meaning that they gave behind the world that we live in.
- The spiritual plane: denying the law of God and replacing it with Kabbalah/Talmud/New Age/etc fallacies, beyond providing proper ways of living and values (Virtues), it generally gave purpose and belonging. It also provided a solid basis for community, society, and nations.

>>539596907
Im too retarded to answer you fren. Maybe you can find your answers in his books or ask him directly during one of his conferences. He seem very humble and open to discussion.

File: landscape-with-diogenes.jpg (177 KB, 1079x782)

177 KB JPG

>>539593561
In a world where we lost true Aristocrats, who had dedicated their lives to serving the people, money is truly power, and has never been more so.
If anything were to happen, money will need to come into the equation. It should either be by making it worthless, or subjugating their system. I expected that cooperative/local banks, of which we have many, could provide alternative economic frameworks, but surprisingly they're not as popular. They should work on paper, though.

>>539593806
The conclusion is striking and correct, of course we must separate entirely ourselves, even in name, to what they call "the West". But it needs to not only be in name, but in values, virtues, and all manner of processes and things.

>>539596179
Thanks a lot for the effort friend, and for bringing this text to light. It's great, but do you think it would be possible to make a summary post on the first page to stir discussion? Also, I believe these books propose solutions, one post on them could be appreciated in order to help everyone look forward.

we dont give a flying fuck

File: the-destruction-of-the-te(...).jpg (129 KB, 1021x745)

129 KB JPG

>>539599000
Yes, about you demonic spawn.

Go back to one of the hundred+ threads that are made just for people like you.

>>539599000
Thanks, moshe.

>>539598866
Rivarol is full of articles I would like to copy and paste because they offer a comprehension of the world for retards like me without having to read a ton of books.
I don't know if they will survive this year because the repression is strong.
Jérome Bourbon is condamned to pay 25 000 €
And the list of the trials just keep going on.
As for the solutions I heard they were fully exposed in "the anti-Christian conspiracy" Tome II by Henri Delassus.
So maybe you should check there.

File: IMG_0173.jpg (1.44 MB, 1290x963)

1.44 MB JPG

>>539596907
I think you can draw parallels from the fall of the church to the current fall of jewish power we are witnessing today. Every dominant institution grows inside an era that they are optimized to rule over, and they craft religious edicts that empower them at the same time it makes their adaptations inflexible and rigid. The printing press was obviously the death knell of Christianity. The interesting aspect of dominant institutions lifecycles is that it seems the advents of technology that are responsible for their decline also seem to bring about a flurry of growth preceding their turn to decline.

>>539599799
Indeed.

>>539596907
>>539599799
To finish that thought, let’s look at what brought about the decline of jewish power that has arguably started to act as the dominant institution of western civilization around the 18th century. The lush of enlightenment philosophy and civil rights has been the lynchpin of banking power. However the Jihadi extremist version of this being globalism first brought about rapid near unstoppable expansion until it empowered the very foreign elements that you might observe are actively responsible in dismantling this institution today, whether it be Chinese manufacturing or Color communism eroding the industriousness of western nation.

>>539599720
You're right about both Rivarol and the repression. Our dear "Republic" isn't very tolerant of dissenting opinions, despite them stating the opposite officially.
Thanks for the recs, I'll see what I can find.

What is your own opinion on what we can do, as two simple layman?

>>539600135
I think it come from us, going back to the church, the real one so it seems like only Sedevacantists are in the right path nowadays.
Im a bit lost in this climate ngl, I don't want to induce peope in error.

>>539599799
>>539600086
I guess you're not wrong about that. We're seeing at least performatively a decline of jewish power. Also, the biggest declines in stock market for example are preceded by a large bull run, or explosion to the top, as well. It's just representative of human psychology to some extent, I suppose.

What's intriguing though, is that there's signs of renewal, for example of Catholicism in France. Not only do you see non-secular schools become more popular, more young people in church or religious conferences, but there's also a strong tradition of writers making a small name for themselves.

The big question is, whether this is merely noise after the fall, or if it's the start of something new that only needs to be accompanied towards success.

>>539600086
>>539599799
>>539596907

Finally let’s speculate on the new rising dominant institution the technates, which seem will be largely comprised of factions of East Asian industrial families. This ability to aggregate, emulate, and reflect human intelligence will obviously bring about a near unstoppable rapid expansion in influence and control as is first being witness by “Artificial Intelligence” and most importantly “Robotics”. However, principles of the universe do not alter across time, so we can safely assume the rapid innovation of robotics will some how bring about the death of this East Asian power probably hundreds of years from now. Who knows how. Maybe space colonies, genetic modification, etc. I don’t know, but it is interesting to see the bud before it blossoms.

>>539600504
I wouldn't go that far. The current AI models aren't it. They are good at a few things, they will never bring upon this so called dominance. From Fortune 500 companies to AI experts like Yann LeCun, all are scaling back on usage or trying to find alternatives approaches.

In general, I also think that technological progress itself may be suffering the same pattern that you detailed previously. The current AI craze could be a last hurrah, in a generally stagnant world of innovation, at least when we compare to the twentieth century (up to mid ~1960s or 1980s at most).

>>539600403
Unfortunately, my observation of human political nature is that it is largely a thrashing and flailing process driven by the greater powers behind it. Just as these predominantly jewish banking institutions gladly enabled the enlightenment, currently wear the skinsuit of America as if they are the same as the founders, and even used funding to drive the growth of communism and even nationalisms. I find the psuedo restoration of Christian faith is interesting in that both the fiat banking cartels and technates are trying to foster the growth of the ideologies for their own aims of maintaining or seizing power respectively. However, I have no doubt these powerful institutions will disregard this nurturing movement should it stop advancing their own growth.

File: the-sacrifice-of-isaac-1659.jpg (111 KB, 942x710)

111 KB JPG

>>539600971
>I find the psuedo restoration of Christian faith is interesting in that both the fiat banking cartels and technates are trying to foster the growth of the ideologies for their own aims of maintaining or seizing power respectively.

That claim I cannot get behind though, at least of the Catholic movement we see in France today. The state is against it, and there's very few backers, with many being shamelessly attacked and banned. See the discussions we had above with >>539599720

>>539600354
I think, the issue of Sedevacantists vs not Sedevacantists is a trap, to a large extent. Not that the fundamental issue of keeping the Faith is wrong, far from it, but it's a debate that's above many of us.
What I notice, is that in both the traditional Church and the Sedes, there's a large amount of Good and reasonable people. So I think the place matters less as what you would do inside it, at least.

>>539600970
I agree with you. I think AI is not the golden goose of the technates. I think that you will find they finally find their footing and the destruction of the banking cartels in robotics. You can see this already in the advent of advance surveillance and drone technology for warfare. As brilliant as the ability to print and force the adoption of infinite fiat currency under the threat of violence is, I think we’ll see that the currency printing will act as a subjugate when those controlling robotics can assassinate or blackmail far more effectively than fake money can bribe or grow conflict.

>>539601142
As I see it (could be wrong), it seems that the technates largely allow or event promote more traditional/conservative Christianity like Orthodoxy and Catholocism. However, the banking cartels obviously push more zionist/evangelical liberal Christian protestantism. Each pushed for their own reasons. I would assume, whereas the banking institutions benefit from a more ambient pervasiveness and conflict driven spirit; yet the technates have more to gain from a highly hierarchical and orderly Christianity like traditional catholicism and orthodox.

File: 1671210034045890.jpg (180 KB, 784x1024)

180 KB JPG

>>539601331
It's a bit early to call it yet, but it's correct there's a strong push to reorient technology towards mass control of people, and towards ubiquitous weapons in society (a drone is easy to deploy, a tank not so much).

While the second point is worrying, the first point I'm not sure of yet. In effect, since the book "Psychology of Crowds", or whichever the english title is, we know how easy people are to control, and we've seen it the last century, how our so called democracy made use of similar techniques. It's unclear what cameras, AI-assisted checks would add to what's already implemented through psychological means. Even less dissents? They're trying to build a thousand year globohomo reich?

File: IMG_1307.jpg (90 KB, 891x1024)

90 KB JPG

>>539594959
bump