that just means we're making things more efficient. it's insanity to make work for the sake of work.arguing against this is saying we shouldn't use combine harvesters as it puts millions of farm hands out of work, or that we should have 12 men dig a ditch with shovels instead of 1 man in a mechanical digger because 12 men are employed if we do it the hard way. If you want pointless busywork to exist for the sake of people getting paid then you're arguing for UBI in effect because the busywork is, by definition, pointless and could just as well not be done
you are still running tht fear camapaign? Fuck off!There is not going to be a bail out, there is not going to be a monopoly regulated. Open models exist, heretic open weight models exist, they run on 10 year old consumer hardwareYou lost, one cannot regulate 150M+ 1080ti in circulation
>>539614726Good summary, likely to upset some entitled faggots that can for now hide their entitlement behind their faux-usefulness.
what should i do before i blow my shit clean off.what have you always wanted to do before you die.https://youtu.be/P2iJoO7AitA
>>539614726>that just means we're making things more efficientFor who? You are anti-human, memeflaggot.
>>539614726this is inevitable, the only question is whether the changes will be generational or sudden.
>>539615094>For who?For everyone. Work exists because a certain job needs to be done. If it takes 12 men to dig the ditch you employ 12 men. You're not doing it out of charity, you're doing it because the job needs doing. If you can employ 1 man in a machine to do it then you employ 1 man unless you're running a charity.
Efficiency at the cost of redundancy and robustness in critical systems is absolutely pants on head retarded when it comes to any critical system.
>>539614726>It's good if AI will put everyone out of a jobthats not going to happen, the best systems I've seen are below human intelligence in actually demanding tasksthey can do shit very fast but the existing solutions only work for specific types of problems and you need to be a fucking expert to know what they even are
>>539614726efficiency 50 years ago>how smoothly could we be running things?efficiency now>how few people on the payroll can we legally get away with?
>>539614726That would be true if the increasingly few didn't own everything. That's why even with increasing productivity people are still working the same amount. There is an argument to be had to that it's important for humans as creative creatures to be the ones actually making things and thinking things instead of having machines and AI do everything. Too much technology enfeebles us and turns us into subhumans who just consume instead of artisans and craftsman who create.
>>539614726This is true though and an inevitability. A society where there are zero jobs and AI does everything is the future.
>>539615280I prefer suden of generations. Why should I have to work when I could be doing something I enjoy instead. Not everyone has a cozy office job with a 40 hour work week.Some of us have to work 50 hours a week lifting heavy shit.
