[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Thoughts of deepfake porn?
Should it be illegal?
>>
>>539629948
She is retarded. Who's gonna sue once AI just starts making it on its own?
>>
>>539629948
She got fat and is just taking it out on her gooners.
>>
>>539629948
Yes, but not if it's of elected officials.
>>
incel chuds will shout no data centers and more deepfake porn without any self awareness
>>
>>539629948
it's dogshit porn, atrozky got caught gooning to it and made a crying apology video, shit got so out of hand socially that he thought he had to do something like that. stupid thing to criminalize, not too different from criminalizing photoshop edits of politicians too, blatant attack on free speech that will work because most of the states are over 50% beaner now, and the rest are traitors to the constitution.
>>
File: 1774391478916894.mp4 (1.03 MB, 1248x1248)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB MP4
>>539629948
I don't think she means it
>>
>>539630187
Is this real??
>>
>>539629948
shit is retarded. fair use. That's like the most bourgeois take you can have.
>>
>>539630274
Of course it is. Even if she is one.
>>
>>539629948
No
You're just putting a person's face on a fake body that's not even hers, to make that illegal is straight up childish
It's basically automated Photoshop
>>
>>539629948
All Ai shit should be illegal so yes.
>>
I love deepfake porn, not because I enjoy watching it, but because if an unfortunate video of me ever surfaces I can just say it's fake and be believed.
>>
>Abuser

Uh, what? Who's getting abused here? Pixels?
>>
>>539630462
"people" genuinely believe pixels can be abused yes.
>>
>>539629948
I truly do not understand why women care about this so much
>>
>>539629948
>abusers
I hate how leftists can't stop abusing the english language
>>
>>539632515
If AI can produce something that men find "good enough" then they'll stop giving women money for a whiff of pussy.

Women will always fight against anything that reduces their body's value. Women are whores through and through. Even the "good" ones instinctively protect the financial value of pussy
>>
>>539629948
I think AI video that uses people and AI art is evil. Like truly evil. Its making people into your slaves. That is why I actually do believe Spencer Pratt lost his election and it wasn't rigged and Hilton will lose too for using Pratts AI. Nobody thinks its fair or cool that you can make folks do things without their consent or put words in their mouth. So take that, then make people have sex with things they aren't really doing with, you are an evil son of a bitch to me. Leave my daughter out of this or I would do some violence on you, if any boy does a deepfake or AI art to my daughter I would consider the worst. Now I don't actually have a daughter but its about principles of defending your family from these perverted quasi-rapists. I am not like the average person here who would just high five the guy and jerk off to it.

Really that you have to explain to retards here that AI Video is not like parody but is too realistic to be funny and therefore gets to be so bad its evil, well that speaks volumes.
>>
>>539629948
So can you sue for drawings too now
>>
>>539629948
Republican faggots are the ones that brought in the take iit down act.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.