Picrel, why are chudcels like this?
>>539639899Easy. It's called brainwashing at scale. Look it up sometime. >If lots of people like a thing that must equate to it being >good!
>>539640089No it's just called amerimutts. That's just amerimutts the only word that answers everything
>>539639899People that spam the same threads over should be subject to testicular torsion
>>539639899Feels like bloated rating numberAlso femoids loove this movie.
>>539639899Ok but opening weekend was a week ago, where are we now?
>>539639899Oppenheimer also got good ratings and made bank, and the movie is absolute bore-fest trash.Normies simply will watch a movie because it's "popular" and advertised everywhere, and everyone is watching it - and if the consensus is that it's "good" or "sophisticated" he won't go against the grain unless the shits exceptionally bad. Which it probably isn't, it's just meh.
>>539639899You should feel bad for posting AI slop
>>539640160Nice cope
>>539639899It’s just STOP THE COUNT SYNDROME after-effects
>>539639899Oh.I'm going to go see it in theater then. Right after my first CoViD shot.
>>539639899>metacritic user score 5.2>negatives getting deleted and positives being obviously fake>rotten tomatoes>jews blatantly jacking each other's mutilated shrimpLet's move the goalposts once more, back from your social media retard cancer strawmanfaggery>back to where they started, which is that the movie is kiked dogshitIf you paid to see this movie you will eventually be gassed by fascsist.If you pirate it you only go to the normal concentration camps.Herbert
>>539639899Well I still thinks it looks bad
>>539639899It's not a good movie and people are only going to see it because they didn't know any better or to "own the chuds".
>>539639899I dont really care honestly wether its sucessful or notI just wont watch it. No amounts of shilling will change that
>>539639899Just watched, had to skip through it was boring. The cyclops was interesting, but the rest was just drama, barely any R-rated action in it aswell.
the viral marketing campaign backfired for me. When I saw the nigerian obongo helen of troy, and the rest of the cast I was really disappointed.Not only will I not be buying a movie ticket to see it in theatre, I won't pirate it either. That's right I'm not even bothering to watch it for free.Seethe & sneed.
>>539640440This can't be real, kek
>>539641521It's literally the movie of the decade. But you do need to be above a certain intellectual threshold to appreciate proper cinematic art.
>>539639899I will not watch the movie.
>>539639899Same problem I have with the Grand Budapest Hotel, whilst visually interesting and stylistic, the plot is not interesting and the way it is handled is predictable and at a meandering pace; I also really didn't like that they didn't just use historic places or uniforms that actually existed at the time and instead borrowed adjacent to history, as though the film had this whole fake feel about it that put me off too.Same thing goes for Odyssey, it looks fake and feels fake, the combat appears to be a bad joke and borrows from Marvel slop standards heavily, meh I give it a miss and if I dare watch it, I am probably going to be disappointed instead of pleasantly surprised, like I was with Grand Budapest Hotel, you think these films will age nicely and remind you of a lost time but most of the time it's exactly as you remembered, a polished turd where the stench is overbearing and you want to return to a better film with a more exciting plot or a more real plot you feel invested in.
I can tell if a movie will lose, break even, or profit and by how much just by watching a trailer. The movie is going to break even, only by tax write offs.
>>539639899Don't care, won't watch it
>>539639899Not enough scenes of best boy.
>>539640440>car explodes>... but the explosion is transparentCHUDS, EXPLAIN YOURSELVES? THIS IS THE CHUD QUALITY?
>>539639899i don't get why people want it to be the perfect movie. why make it a requirement? why bother nitpicking? just treat it as a play and enjoy. i did and it was good
>>539641641>>539644929>Uwe Boll movie is of Uwe Boll qualityQuelle surprise!
>>539639899oh no...
>>539646001Jesus, that's very bad. I figured that Nolan's name would practically guarantee a billion dollar return no matter how shitty the movie was but it's not even projected to break even?
Nobody is going to watch this film in ten yearsInception gets watched today, his Batman trilogy gets watched today, this won't be
>>539639899would you agree?
>>53964025984 million in second week.
>>539640160That Mr Obvious guy is an actual homo.
>>539645407>why do people wabt a quality product when they pay money for it. Anon if you buy a cake and before serving it I took a bite out it and spit on it, would you still eat it?
>>539639899Still not going to watch it
>>539646809I have no idea what they tried to do with this move. I know it's peripherally about the Franco-Dahomean wars and for some ungodly reason have Ghezo in it but I assume that due to modernity it also takes their side despite them unambiguously being the villains as well as cartoonishly evil people.Has anyone actually seen it? Can someone explain it to me?
>>539639899People that are invested in movie box offices and RT scores are the lowest subhumans in the world. Do you really have nothing else going in your life.
>>539647100i should first point out that cinema is an experience not a product>would you still eat it?if i had a taste of it prior to your act and found it to be delicious, i'd ignore the segment you had spit on and enjoy the rest. at which i would conclude it as a great experience even with it's mild inconveniences
>>539639899You have to be an idiot if you think there is any way forward that doesn't involve extreme violence and the mass slaughter of hundreds of millions of people.
>>539639899>only website that doesn’t actively censor reviews sits at a 5.1 or so“Movie of the decade.”
