I truly believe that females are subhuman. They don't do anything that males can't do infinitely better (with the sole exception of childbirth). They're obviously much weaker. There is evidence suggesting that they're slightly less intelligent on average (per Lynn's developmental theory) and much less likely to be highly intelligent (on account of higher male variability). Males are objectively valuable for reasons aside from reproduction. Women are not, which is why appeals to their ability to give birth are always made in discussions like this one. But being little more than a tool for reproduction is no compensation. We are the more competent sex, and women simply aren't of equal worth. If females weren't required for reproduction, then there would be nothing preventing us from wiping them out entirely. If I were born female, then I would kill myself.
>>539663118I wish my IQ weren't 133-134 and for it to be 138 instead
>>539663118FOIDSLOP THREAD KYS
Do you understand that women are missing a whole chromosome of unique genetic material? (Men have an extra whole y chromosome, while the x chromosome in women is duplicate and mostly unnecessary).Women are literally inferior to men and they should not be allowed to guide civilisation.Women are fuckholes intended to be used for breeding and child rearing and not be of equal status to menHopefully the smart amongst the women will realize this and lobby against their own rights
>>539663776No, they should all be killed. There is no reason why they should exist once the artificial womb is invented (which should happen within the next few decades).
>>539663718No, I'm speaking the truth. Female nature (primarily their sentimentality, neuroticism, and self-obsession) is detrimental to civilization. Moreover, the female advantages aren't nearly as fixed or as large in magnitude as the male ones. They have no advantages that are as consistently viable as greater strength. In other words, females are almost completely unnecessary.
>>539663118>I truly believe that females are subhumanIs your mother subhuman as well or not?
>>539664863If I said yes, then how would you respond?
>>539664985Does your mother deserve to be killed after putting efforts in raising you? Or you were raised without mother?
>>539665454She'll be dead by the time artificial wombs are created, so no. No, I was raised with a mother.
>>539663862Stop the hate in your heart weakling. You'd get sparked out by me. Yet I'm not advocating for you to be killed. Little faggot. Yes we can't let females lead, no we won't kill them. They're valuable in their own way if they are in the right position. Which is as caring mothers, wanting as much children as they can bare.
>>539665732>Stop the hate in your heart weaklingNonsense. It isn't wrong to hate females.>They're valuable in their own way if they are in the right position. Which is as caring mothers, wanting as much children as they can bare.Why do single fathers outperform single mothers, then? Women seem to be much worse at parenting.
>>539664863Fuck my piece of shit “mother”.>>539665732Slit your wrist, demon. Take your pathetic “right wing” and shove it up your ass. All of you must perish and rot in the same graves.
>>539667206You agree that females ought to be annihilated?
