Now that the dust has settled, what was his problem?Why was he so deranged and tyrannical?
>>539664768bro already had mental issues then had to deal with the American Revolution leading straight into Napoleon, all after his monarchy had been ravaged by jews. give him a break
>>539664768> Please pay the 2% tax to us for defending you> Chimp out and Rebel> Ally with the French, Spanish and Dutch Why were they like this?
>>539665172Give us a reason on why we shouldn't rebel from you
>>539665172>He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt out towns, and destroyed the lives of our people"Defending you"
>>539665172i still think we should've turned right around and colonized you all in return when we had the chance. instead we gave you money for some reason
>>539665172>>539665366https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Years'_War#Outcomes "Britain, despite its victories, ended the war close to bankruptcy and now faced a difficult situation in North America after the war's conclusion."
>>539665151if the American Revolution doesn't happen, does the French revolution and Napoleon happen? no Rothchilds with extreme wealth. without these, Does King George right the ship?
>>539665272>>539665475 It had to pacify both its new French-Canadian subjects and the many American Indian tribes who had previously supported France, all while its British colonial subjects were experiencing economic hardships brought on by the end of the fighting.[151] Then, in 1763, Pontiac's War broke out as a group of Indian tribes in the Great Lakes region and the Northwest (the modern American Midwest), unhappy with the eclipse of French power, rebelled against British rule.
>>539665531Monarchs craeted the banker jews fag
>>539665576The tribes were said to have been led by the Odawa chief Pontiac, though his role as the leader of the confederation seems to have been exaggerated by the British. [citation needed] The Indian tribes had previously maintained congenial relations with French fur traders, but felt cheated by the business practices of the Anglo-American fur traders that had replaced the French.[152] Moreover, the Indians feared that the coming of British rule might lead to white settlers displacing them off their land, whereas it was known that the French had only come as fur traders.[152] Pontiac's War was a major conflict in which the British temporarily lost control of the Great Lakes-Northwest regions to the Indians.[153] By the middle of 1763, the only forts the British held in the region were Fort Detroit (modern Detroit, Michigan), Fort Niagara (modern Youngstown, New York) and Fort Pitt (modern Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) with the rest all being lost to the Indians.[154] It was only with the British victory at the Battle of Bushy Run that prevented a complete collapse of British power in the Great Lakes region.[155] King George III's Proclamation of 1763, which forbade white settlement beyond the crest of the Appalachians, was intended to appease the Indians but led to considerable outrage in the Thirteen Colonies, whose inhabitants were eager to acquire native lands. The Quebec Act 1774, similarly intended to win over the loyalty of French Canadians, also spurred resentment among American colonists.[156] The Act protected Catholic religion and French language, which enraged the Americans, but the Québécois remained loyal to the British Crown during the American Revolution and did not rebel.
