If we leave religion out of it, how do you justify the view that homosexuality is wrong
The same way you justify incest is wrong I guess
>>539689153It's lacking in self-respect.
>>539689153its easy, is it beneficial to the society we have set up? no its not, because gay people cant have children or raise children, unless they adopt them
>>539689153>how do you justify the view that homosexuality is wrongobserving their behavior
>>539689216Bc it's traumatic for one partner?
>>539689283>is it beneficial to the societyAre billionaires?
It’s gross
>>539689355Fags are the new billionaires.
>>539689153Tribalism. It is the ancestral instinct that guides in-group and out-group behavior.
>>539689153You are full of aids, go away ffs. You are a putrid shit.
>>539689153poo poo sex is bad because its unhygienic and spreads disease
>>539689355Yea they are more valuable than gays because they provide value. Gays don't provide anything, just take. Having children is the basis of society...Thats why homosexuality should not be encouraged
>>539689153Rampant disease, prone to pedophilia, cannot reproduce without jumping into heterosex(this includes a donor), and promiscuity lifestyles.
>>539689153Is gay stuff a wedge issue. A tool to divide us?
>>539689402No more anal sex with my wife then :(
>>539689153STDs
>>539689441And they stink as a rotten corpse because their anus is literally rotting. Absolutely vile.
>>539689153hedonism, cutting off means to propagate good genes, offensive nuisance, spread of disease and amplifies it with carefree sex, unnecessary diapers, made by mossad.
>>539689298Is their a behavior that only gay people have or something?
>>539689153Aids, other diseases, loss of elasticity in butthole, doodoo
>>539689441>>539689485No matter how you weigh or measure it faggotry is abhorrent, you ironically need some sort of metaphysical appeal to the value of "free expression" to defend it, which is funny because most sodomites are atheistic and materialistic. It's all mentally ill nonsense no matter how you slice it.
>>539689394The mass majority of gay people don’t have aids though.
>>539689153it's a fetish
>>539689153society itself is an evolutionary adaptation that promotes the survival of the species.it is a social mechanism that allows us to pool talent and resources to improve our ability to survive and reproduce.the very function of society is to facilitiate the production and rearing of children.homosexuals do not produce children.however, they do consume resources.this means they are ALWAYS net drain to society as they NEVER contribute to it's primary purpose.in small quantities this can be ignored as simple inefficiency in the system, however to celebrate homosexuality is to encourage system losses that threaten the structure as a whole.>are you saying gay people can't contribute to society?No, I am saying they fail at fulfilling the core function of society and this will always be a detriment because for every gay person with a valuable skill there is at least one straight person with the same skill that they must compete with for resources.this is fundamentally selfish and immoral.
>>539689355yes, thats how they become billionaires.I'm sick of you people acting like building a successful business is wrong.Elon Musk employs tens of thousands of people in jobs that would not exist without him.fuck you.
>>539689570Raping babies to death that they adopt is one
If we leave out homosexuals how do we justify the view that religion is wrong
>>539689387So you’re saying gay people are shunned away based on an evolutionary reason? That’s dumb.
>>539689673but the vast majority of people with aids are gayor black, but thats a separate conversation
>>539689153>how do you justify the view that homosexuality is wrongIt takes a man and a woman creating and raising 3 healthy children to adulthood to replace themselves in the next generation + add one more to maintain a minimally growing civilization. Every "homosexual" adds another child that a "heterosexual" couple must create to pick up their slack, in short you are literally killing society.In the past "homosexuality" was actually "bisexuality" and it was typically men, sometimes women that were married but did sexual acts with the same sex occasionally. The 'identity' of 'homosexual' that we see in society today that a person 'identifies' as a person that exclusively has sex with people from the same sex is selfish, and irredeemably corrosive to a growing and healthy society. Not only is it an abomination before God, but it actively harms the health of society; especially in a context where it is being promoted as a valid lifestyle choice for a growing plurality of society.Western governments will have to begin taking stronger action against people without children, barring from public funds, increased taxes, etc. I dont think we will see anti-faggotry laws, but i think within the next 20-30yrs we will see major laws passed that create economic penalties for people without children. Barring from welfare assistance if you dont have children will be the first step.
>>539689889disprove it faggot.why is it dumb?
>>539689153Disease.
>>539689153Because they include children.That's why homos are evil.
>>539689765fuck you kike
>>539689283Gay couples/individuals essentially provide excess leaders/mentors/teachers to any surplus of children a traditional family has.Your point is moot, it takes a village...Why do you think the trait survived, so far?
>>539689153It's mental illness.
>>539689153peepee no go in poopoo
>>539689948>everyone who opposes socialism is a jewyou will be shot and all will applaud.your life holds no value to anyone.your own parents despise you.you are a waste of space.you should just end it
>>539689986there is not a single social role a fag fulfills that a straight person cannot, and your "takes a village" shit is marxist collectivist bullshit.fuck off.
I think it's because of all the child molestation gays do.
>>539689501Gay people can still reproduce though. And a lack of proper education for same-sex sex causes diseases to spread
>>539690104So many normies are default marxists because of kike media. They don't even realize what tools they are.
>>539689986Yea except they are not providing their replacements so it doesn't matter....
>>539689153I see it as a defect. A mental defect preventing reproduction. If everyone would be homo there would be no more breeding and humianity would vanish.It’s a defect like any other defect. Most people have some kind of defects. It does intervene with having a normal life and being able to do things.The problem or the wrongness people see in it is more related to flamboyancy fatigue. No one wants to know you’re homo. No one wants to see it or hear noise about it. The whole movement and everything that gravitates around it, no one is really interested about it ands it just annoying.Aside from just being homo, there are retarded homos. Those who groom kids, those who rape, etc… Despite being a small proportion(?) their action influence a lot public opinion and exacerbates enven more the dislike.You understand?
>>539690090Cool story bro
>>539689986>Why do you think the trait survived, so far?Because homosexuals were procreating, because in the past there was very little 'homosexuality' in the sense that you were a gay person that exclusively had sex with people from the same sex and never married. People like this were allowed to live (mostly) in Europe for the past few hundred years, but pretty much every other culture on the planet killed people like this except maybe Oriental Eunuch culture.
>>539689153they spread diseases like browns and reproduce by molesting children
All kinky stuff should be kept privateHomos are just the worst at following this basic etiquette
>>539689153Easy. Homosexuality is a malfunction of the biological systems for procreation, therefore it is objectively wrong.
>>539689153Nothing to do with religion.A man and a man is INHERENTLY a lesser pairing than a man and a woman. Objectively speaking a man+woman couple is the SUPERIOR coupling. So given that a man+man couple is inferior to a man+woman couple; so yes relatively speaking it's wrong.If you're so stupid that you fail to instinctively see why a man+woman couple > a man+man couple...then you've been brainwashed by the globohomo.Man + Woman = Life (procreation/continuation of existence)Man + Man = STDs (this is the only thing gays "create")So yes, homosexuality is OBJECTIVELY wrong.
>>539689153le animalistic sodomy.
>>539689153PUBLIC-HEALTH STATISTICS?
>>539689216>The same way you justify incest is wrong I guessSo it's not wrong.
I aint religious but seeing fags showing intimacy in public makes my stomach churn.Same way that when seeing gore.
>>539689153If you leave God out then nothing is right or wrong because you have no moral foundation from which to judge anything.
>>539689153it breeds diseasesit leads to child abuseit wastes resources that otherwise would be use to produce offspring
>>539690839But like you would agree that their is nothing wrong with being gay
>>539689153Anal leakage>>539689370More than you know.
>>539689153I dont, homosexuality doesnt exist
>>539689153It spreads aids and ruins assholes. If it's so natural than why is it so painful?????check mate, retard.
>>539689673only because hetero majority burned a lot of money on prevention, education and curesif it were left up to the fags they would have died out from aid already
>>539690906I think it depends on what you want for your society. There's a fine balance between personal freedoms and social cohesion and I think that faggotry is crossing a bit too much for the health of the group.There's a reason why they got stoned to death or drowned in bogs in ancient times.I don't hate them but I don't want them around so for me a status quo of the 50-60's where they were hidden from society but not persecuted sounds like a nice balance.There's no right or wrong in the grand scheme of things.
/pol/ bully us just because we turned out different.And not everyone is meant to procreate. Btw, /pol/'s hero Hitler had no children, neither did George Washington or Nietzsche or Plato, nor does Fuentes or asmongold or the Pope or sneako or a million other straggots this board worships, so why only bully gays about that.
>>539691079>Hitler had no childrenDidnt Hitler only have one testicle? Some people are naturally infertile, therefore they cannot have children. That is not the same as being fertile and choosing to not have children, or intentionally sterilizing yourself.>neither did George WashingtonHighly unlikely. Washington and Jefferson were both well known to like to fuck their slave girls. Washington's wife was on the older side and only had one of her 4 children survive to adulthood from her previous marriage so a health issue isnt out of the question there. Again pointing to the fact that a famous person didnt have children doesnt absolve YOU of being a faggot. It strengthens the argument that we know their will be x% of infertile people that fertile people have to breed extra to replace, it doesnt excuse faggots making the birth deficit even higher.>Plato, the PopeGreek philosophers were something akin to religious monks. People that give their life over to religious devotion and have taken an oath of chastity are excused.>Fuentes, SneakoAre both rightfully mocked and harassed as homosexuals for not procreating yet, despite both claiming to have conservative religious values 2 wrongs doesnt make a right, stop being a faggot. Literally just stop.
>>539689153I'm a real woman.
>>539689370
>>539689153Same as pedo beastiality and incestDisease, trauma and consent >>539689991Such a sane society>>539691953Why would men want to be women. Gayer weaker version of men. Being male has more advantages. Girls are just pretty .
>>539689665Why is that ironic? You can make arguments for free expression without the Bible or... whatever you're implying is the opposite of materialism.
>>539689153just don't like em, simple as
>>539691893We don't wanna fuck women.You can't make us.Why don't (You) go fuck all the women if you love it so much.
>>539689153Because it's rampant sexual hedonism for no practical purpose except hedonism.As a consequence, it results in vastly exaggerated spreading of various diseases.
>>539691893There's no such thing as "naturally infertile." Everyone who's infertile is infertile because of some deviation from the biological norm, which is to procreate. You're making a bunch of cases of special pleading for demographics you like, despite their own deviation from the norm, while providing no special pleas for a group you dislike. This means that your standard is inconsistent and therefore predicts nothing.
>>539692096>Why don't (You) go fuck all the women if you love it so much.Because I am a Catholic, and I am only allowed to fuck my wife. The point of the thread was WHY is homosexuality is bad. Its not to encourage straight people to have more sex, and carrying more of the burden that 'people' like YOU are creating.Maybe you are have a cryptosporidium infection altering your brain function from fecal exposure?
>>539692073This is how I feel about muslims. Death to Palestine lol
>>539689153The actions of homosexuals
>>539689153I don’t think it’s inherently wrong to be homosexual, but their public displays in pride parades are disgusting and classless>>539690104“Takes a village” isn’t Marxist bullshit where do you get this shit from? Historically, families were more than just parents, it included uncles, aunts, cousins, GRANDPARENTS! Boomers fucked it up for the most part. Notice how everyone who’s more put together in life grew up with a wider support system than just a mom and dad. Even if your parents are shit, you’d still have others who have your back.
