Can someone explain why in many states in the US it is illegal to have sex with a hooker, but it is legal to have sex with a hooker if you record it and post it on the internet as porn?What is the rationale?
>>539717553Jews deserve their cut
pic unrelated
>>539717553They are promoting simping.
>>539717553the currency transaction takes place off cameraand the whores solicit from inside their own home
>>539717762is this some kind of chinese proverb?
>>539717608Ironically this is it. The smelly kikes can't guarantee their cut if two consenting adults do it in private. But they can stick their slimy fingers into the pot with it being distributed through studios or otherwise.
>>539717883but can't you just release it yourself? Or do you need to go through an official studio for it to count or something?
>>539717553>hire hooker>setup camera but "forget" to push record>oh well I'm just an incompetent directoryou're welcome
>>539717553>but it is legal to have sex with a hooker if you record it and post it on the internet as porn?>What is the rationale?its start with J and end with S
When jews do it, it's called pornography.When the goyim do it, it's illegal, because there is some slim chance it results in a white child being born.
>>539719002Release it yourself where and how? Think about it. What are you gonna do, set up a stand and sell DVDs you burned yourself? Hell even in that scenario you still bought the blank DVDs from some disgusting kike. Plus you'll probably be shut down by cops for not having a license to distribute lolThere is actually no legitimate way to release it yourself without some form of kike involvement.
>>539717553Actual prostitutes enjoy their jobs and it's not like porn, so naturally men are against this except rich people.
>>539717553she cute
>>539719513doesnt self uploading it to a porn site count?
>>539719644strong side profile but you wont like what you see from other angles.
>>539717553>but it is legal to have sex with a hooker if you record it and post it on the internet as porn?It's (sadly) not that simple. I do agree though, having one illegal but not the other makes no sense.
>>539717553It's not the same. The government can't tax the hooker.
>>539719744No only jeets watch tube sites
>>539717553>hair braidYou can't tell me she didn't do this on purpose. She knows she's going to be in front of cameras. This case will go viral. It's very performative.
>>539717553the real difference is some politician got money from porn makers but not from johns.
>>539719002See >>539719513
>>539717553Outdated law defended by the most terrible elements on both sides responsible for ruining society
>>539717553The legal rationale is pornography performers are being paid "to produce a recording" and not the sex act itself. If this sounds Jewish it's because it is. t. Lawfag
