90% of the board believes that this became a human
>>539732420>unironic creationistLel
>>539732420you mean that became a whale/dolphin/seal?
>>539732420Evolution is false. Everything was created.
thats fucking ridiculous man
looks finnish
why did he have to do it bros...
>>539732420The most shocking evidence is watching an embryo develop. We still pass through the lizard/amphibian stage during gestation.
>>539732420
Anon, that's legitimately your 235th Grandmother. Why are you being so rude about her? She'd be so upset if she knew you were doing this...
Seriously. Go apologise to her. Quick - before she swims away lolololol
>>539732498Only whale and dolphin, seals are pinnepeds which had a different ancestor that evolved to be aquatic.
>>539732763Ahaåhaåhaåhså
>>539732420Hey! That's my grandfather!Where did you get his pic from?
why did all of the dinosaurs die out, but mammals thrived after that extinction event? l
>>539734369mammals were tiny like birds and ate same shit as birds like seeds and worms
>>539734369Birds are literally dinosaurs.
>>539734676why aren't scavengers the most dominant species? were they for a considerable amount of time?
>>53973242090%!?!? Wow
>>539732420Cetaceans have hip bones. Not one creationist can explain this. I've stated this fact in several evolution threads and they're still scared to address it.
>>539734676Mammals were birds now? That makes so much more sense than an all powerful creation entity. When did the mammals change from birds?
>>539734997God created them before he created any of the land animals. It says so in the bible.
>>539734997The 90s Dodge caravan shares many of the same engine parts as their cars. There is far too many coincidences and "just right" fine tuning for this all to be by accident like you were to your parents.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1979.tb00027.x>the tympanic membranes and the tympanic processes of the stapes in recent mammals, reptiles + birds. and frogs. are not homologous;>the evolution of “special periotic systems” in the ancestors of amphibians and amniotes were independent events>the amphibian tympanic membrane. probably including that of labyrinthodonts. is not ancestral to that of amniotes. and that labyiinthodonts with an otic notch are not suitable as amniote ancestorsJust a friendly reminder that there is no proof that vertebrates evolved from amphibians and that the fossil record does not support the scenario of some random fish-lizard crawling up on land and suddenly evolve lungs out of nowhere.
>>539735106It isn't an accident it's evolution.
>>539734931The crocodilians dominated and ate the mammals, imagine a land crocodile sustained determined sprint
Packicetus did not become a human.
>>539732420it makes more sense to me than a jew god creating everything
>>539732420Government "people" and especially "fellow whites" became reptiles, Anon
>>539735189Congratulations, you're an absolute dumbass. Thanks for playing.
>>539732420A loving god would not create niggers. A evolutionary detour might create niggers.
>>539735614we call them jews now days
>>539732420only boomers, the mentally ill, brownoids, and grifters believe in creationism anymore.
>>539732420 The people who believe it were told it as truth when they were five years old. They didn't have the critical thinking to question it and it came from one of their first authority figures in their lives (teacher).Do you know how hard it is to get people to believe in a new truth especially one that is directly competing with a truth that they have held onto since they were children? The generations that were brought up with this are unsaveable. Our only hope is to either delay the teaching of evolution and the big bang theory from kindergarten and push it back to high school and with competing theories. Evolution is currently the only thing being taught in schools and the only thing getting promoted on nature documentaries. These are the two biggest sources of propaganda.
>>539732498No.Aquatic mammals are a different line that evolved from a common ancestor which then returned to the sea after evolving on land for a couple eons while the common ancestors stayed on land and evolved into (eventually) us.
>>539732420Not that hard to believe. Things adapt to the environment and change. Natural selection is real. If wolves can change into every breed of dog both big and small then why couldn't that evolve into humans over millennia? What's preventing it? Why is that such a huge hurdle in your mind?>B-but wolves to dogs is different!Why? It's the perfect example of how evolution works and shows how animals can change over time
>>539737337I get Big Bang theory but I don't actually see much problem with evolution. it's a good way to explain why we have things now that didn't exist in the past and why things in the past don't all exist now.
>>539737724>What's preventing it?Because only beneficial mutations are passed on in nature, and certain mutations are impossible. There is no random mutation that's going to make it possible for a mammal to breathe underwater, for example. And that's not the sort of thing you can gain in small increments across millions of years. If there were such a mutation we'd have already witnessed it in nascent forms. Darwin's theory of evolution basically just took a common fact that everyone already knew about breeding dogs and horses, and then extrapolated that with the blind assumption that all humans must share a common ancestor. But there really isn't any evidence for such a claim. No one is surprised to learn that many species have changed a lot over the years, everyone already knew that prior to Darwin. His one and only novel claim is that all life came from a single celled organism, which is pretty baseless when you take the time to consider it.
>>539737337>Evolution is currently the only thing being taught in schoolsBecause it is a fact the same as grass is green.
>>539732420They're very mentally ill, forgive them and pray that God may have mercy on them.
>>539738271>There is no random mutation that's going to make it possible for a mammal to breathe underwaterThere is certainly a mutation that would allow a cell to get oxygen out of the water.
>>539738271Every theory is flawed though; it's just how that works. I'd be curious to see a competing theory
>>539737852All matter exploded from a singular point. No explanation for the initial ignition for the explosion. No explanation why multiple planets are across the universe are spinning in different directions (this defies the conservation of angular momentum law). These are some of the issues I have with big bang theory, that and it can't be tested for or against. It is another thought experiment with no real world evidence. With its main practical application being nothing. If you removed it, we wouldn't lose anything, neither profit or loss would occur because it is just a headspace theory.Evolution is more complicated. We can observe adaptation over generations. We have never observed transformation, like in OP's picture. Cutting out adaptation from evolution and making it its own theory would most definitely convert it from theory to law. You cut out the parts that arent verifiable and it becomes a scientifically valid idea.
>>539738829Science's greatest strength is in its collection of facts, but it's greatest weakness is in the interpretation of the collected data. It is what it is.
>>539732471Say what you really want to say.
>>539738829>No explanation why multiple planets are across the universe are spinning in different directions (this defies the conservation of angular momentum law).Ummm, if I have an orb spinning counterclockwise at 10rpm and another of equal mass spinning clockwise at 10rpm what is the net angular momentum?
Christcucks are mentally ill.>hurr durr my religion that's based on judaism that's based on canaanite polytheism is the one true religion, and all other religions are wrong because I was told so when I was five and I won't ever consider any evidence to the contrary>also the billions of plant and animal species from across the entire planet earth, including the opposite hemisphere, fit onto a wooden boat>also they were speaking modern Spanish, French, and Italian thousands of years ago at the tower of babel before those languages had even been invented
>>539732420>>539732574>>539732763My ancestor :)
>>539738775And what good would that do without lungs that can take on water? If the idea is that change is iterative and happens over millions of years, how is a small and useless change like that going to propagate itself without the complex structure necessary to make such a change advantageous to the organism? The changes necessary to shift a creatre's lungs from water to land, or land to water, are too complex to happen iteratively when the full set of lungs is needed to function for the organism to survive in its new environment. There's no such thing as a pair of lungs that breathes 0.01% of water, and even if such a thing did exist it would be utterly worthless and confer no advantages, so how do we get enough iterations to add up to 100%? It simply does not stand up to scrutiny.>>539738818Calling it a theory is generous. It's honesty barely even at hypothesis level, it's just an idea with no empirical evidence in its favor and one that raises as many questions as it attempts to answer.
>>539732420I believe dinosaurs never existed. Shit is fake and gay like everything else.
>>539732420More than 90% believe in evolution, faggot
Evolution does not disqualify a Creator or Creators.
>>539739261Bro fish don't have lungs wtf are you talking about.
>>539732420It seems less silly than claiming it all appeared from a god magically making it all appear. At least evolution is observable.
Christucks also believe in spells and magic superpowers even though nobody has ever (EVER) provided photographic proof that they exist. For some reason the magic superpowers stopped working when the camera was invented.
>>539739442That's the point. Complex organs that depend upon the whole to function can't be built iteratively.
>>539732420REEE GET OUT
>>539732420WTF are you on about?I look like that today.>>539732574Mystery of the ages. But I think he was looking for coffee. And a chance to evolve and go back and scare the shit out of the cephalopods.Smart bastards, with their cities and all.
>>539735075The bible also says donkeys and snakes talk.
>>539738271>>539738271>>539739537Imagine being this big of an illiterate FUCKING RETARD. Just because you never received a proper education doesn't mean that everyone else is wrong.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lungfish
>>539739261>>539739442Some do actually. Gills and lungs.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LungfishI'm sure it would be completely impossible for such a fish to come into being and then also iteratively change over time to have smaller and smaller gills until eventually it only breathes air.
>>539739537
>>539738271>only beneficial mutations are passed on in natureWhy do you think so? Sure, they have a greater chance to reproduce, but as long as the mutation isn't debilitating there's literally no reason why it wouldn't be passed on.
>>539739656You might want to actually have an argument if you're going to posture like a babboon.>>539739676Eyes don't depend upon the whole to function in the same way that a complex organ does. Those also aren't examples of iteration, because they're all organisms that exist independently right now.
>>539739927Why should I spend effort to tell you why your random made-up bullshit is wrong, when the fact that the lungfish exists directly contradicts all of those walls of text that your cheeto-encrusted fingers just rageposted? In your next post you'll make up some arbitrary contrived reason why you're going to ignore the fact that the lungfish exists.
>>539740138>when the fact that the lungfish exists directly contradictsBut it doesn't at all. And the fact that you're getting this upset shows you aren't capable of being objective, which means you're wrong by default. Passion driven people can't be correct.
>>539740293>In your next post you'll make up some arbitrary contrived reason why you're going to ignore the fact that the lungfish exists.>And the fact that you're getting this upset shows you aren't capable of being objective, which means you're wrong by default. Passion driven people can't be correct.There it is! You had better start worshipping me since I can prophesy the future.
>>539740392The lungfish doesn't address my concerns with the theory. You may as well have posted a picture of a whale or a dolphin and then pretended that you somehow proved something. The point is about iterative changes, but that went over your head entirely.
>>539738271You've got this picture and then you've got theoretical physicists that say the splotchyness are Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
>>539739927>Those also aren't examples of iteration, because they're all organisms that exist independently right now.Bruh I'm gonna be real with you.
>>539740468You're doing the classic>don't tell me the actual answer>tell me the answer that I want to hear based on these arbitrary criteria that I made uproutine. You have zero self-awareness.
>>539740526woops>>539738829
>>539740574A frogposter with no arguments who can't stop himself from having a melty isn't really in a position to be talking about self-awareness.
>>539732420My poop became smelly that's what I believe
>>539738829>No explanation why multiple planets are across the universe are spinning in different directions (this defies the conservation of angular momentum law).because they formed out space of rocks crashing and sending them spinning?
>>539740699You're crying about arguments while I'm posting about FACTS. I don't give a shit about your christcuck pilpul. Your walls of text don't change objective reality.
>>539732498He’s calling your mom fat
>>539740800Oh, you're just a retard who can't read. This is also another major reason why evolution is so suspect as a theory. All of its supporters think that attacking an irrelevant religion is somehow a valid way of defending their pet theory. If Darwin's theory were legitimate, its defenders wouldn't rely on whataboutisms. It would be able to stand on its own merits and hold up to scientific scrutiny.
>>539732420>>539732471>This mutant fish frog butt fucked this monkey and that made youSeparation of church and state but no separation of science and state?All 3 should be separate if you have any understanding of anything
>>539732420>90%That proves that 90% are severely retarded.
>>539732471>unironically believes life came from rocks>unironically believes single-celled organisms can evolve into multicellular organisms>unironically believes asexual organisms can evolve into sexual organismsKek
>>539732420youre the ychtus man. the fish.
>>539740699>A frogposter with no argumentsYou believe a sky man said abracadabra and poofed everything into existence.
>>539741085see>>539740909The fact that you act this way in response to anyone who questions your theory tells all. If the only reason why you defend Darwin is because you view him as the opposite of religion, then you were never actually interested in scientific truth in the first place.
>>539738271
>>539740970>complex things couldn't have an equally complex explanation for existence
>>539740909Writing more walls of text doesn't change the FACT that you can witness evolution happening in the span of a single lifetime, either through the de novo drug resistances of bacteria and viruses, or through the increasing prevalence of polycystic ovaries among humans>but that wasn't REAL evolution because <more arbitrary reasons I just made up>Dude, shut the fuck up. I'm you from the future and I already know all of your bullshit arguments. You're arguing talking points that were invented by people without a college education, and they completely fall apart with literally any scrutiny. Do a fucking google search.
>>539732471It's a nightmare. Nigger tiers brains. If this is the white race, nuke us. My ancestors and their leaders would push the button themselves, without hésitation.Out of contranianism, many people embrace the most bizarre and retarded ideas.
>>539741149>If Darwin's theory were legitimate, its defenders wouldn't rely on whataboutisms. It would be able to stand on its own merits and hold up to scientific scrutiny.It is stands up so well it's regarded basically as a fact at this point.
>>539741190Everything I wrote has been relevant and uncontested. Everything you write is just endless posturing and strawmen. You've already conceded, so don't bother replying.
>>539740970single celled organisms got tired of viruses wrecking their shit so they said "cya" with their DNA
How can people deny It? If you are White, you probably see a lot of dogs, some of them abominations created by humans, that is, artificial selection. Those disgusting dogs that can't even properly breath. We can do It very fast because we know how It works. Am I surrounded by DUMB people?
>>539741327Being enforced as if it were a fact is not the same as standing up to scrutiny. It's still considered "settled science" that the Covid clot shots were safe, despite the fact that it's been a long established fact that they caused myocarditis and strokes. Darwin falls under suspicion of the same kind of enforcement, due to the people who were pushing his theories from the beginning, and due to the unscientific nature of his claims. Humans were already practicing selective breeding for 10,000 years before Darwin. He didn't theorize anything new, nor discover anything empirically.
>>539741355One day you'll get grow tired of all the pilpul and apologetics bullshit, and come to accept the simple truth like I did. In your deepest heart of hearts you already know what you're writing is bullshit, because of how tired it makes you to argue it in spite of so much observable evidence. It's such a relief when your entire view of the world isn't one giant>ACKSHYUALLY
>>539732420I certainly believe my ancestor was Adam, and probably the Dragon as well. Because God created those before Adam.
>>53973242099%
>>539741529The only pilpul here is yours. I raised a concern about a theory, and you just stomped your feet and screeched for 10 posts before giving up. You didn't answer my question or settle any of my doubts. You didn't even try, because you aren't educated in any of the sciences. You just have a devotional attachment to this one particular theory because you think it "owns the christcucks". You're no better than the ones you hate.
>>539732420It's more believable than these people being "chosen"
>>539741484So I'm guessing you are an atheist or at least not a Christian by previous context, what does the evidence support other than evolution because it seems to support evolution pretty well.
>>539732420Those threads are not as fun and don't generate the ragebait madness like flat earth threads.S tier (glowie genuinely having fun posting): flat earth, space is fake and gay, nuke aren't real A tier(at least have a small percentage based in reality, still fed poisoning the well): 9/11, UFO, secret society (free masonry, Bilderberg, illuminati), chemtrail, haarp, psyops and cabal shit.B tier (Truth is in-between but political beliefs make discussions not genuine: climate change, jewish cabbal, covid, Epstein pizza gate, stop the count.C tier, the hasbeen shitbait posting: evolution, atheism, paranomal.D tier, schizo posting non sense (it's a mix of all the above but the absolute conviction of the poster makes it unfunny and non engaging): machine elves, reptilian, nostradamus posting, hollow earth, nibiru, me being a glowie nigger
>>539741696The chosen people are the people from the bloodlines of Jacob have this blessing. Those people are not.>And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west and to the east, and to the north and to the south; and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.
>>539741629Part of becoming an adult is that you will eventually grow out of your fairy tales, like I grew out of mine. I attended the same creationis-- excuse me, I mean """"""""""intelligent design"""""""""" classes that you did, but I eventually realised how logically inconsistent they were. In time, you will too.
>>539741747Only semi intelligent post in this thread.
>>539732420Well everyone has microplastics in them but not particles from dinosaur compost apparently.
>>539741822You are still just a dumbass idiot.
>>539741724Selective pressure in nature has plenty of evidence, and to an extent that can explain common ancestors for various lineages of species. This much was already known for thousands of years, because humans were doing it intentionally to breed better horses and dogs. Where Darwin comes in, is with the specific idea that all life shares a singular common ancestor. There's no evidence for that particular theory so it will always have to remain a theory, but there are several instances where it introduces a catch-22. A trait is only passed on and expanded upon if it's advantageous, but often times a trait has to first become advantageous to be passed on. Lungs were just one of a few examples, of organs that don't confer a benefit unless they're fully formed and functional, but anything that's built iteratively over millions of years will necessarily be non-function and malformed at first, and for a long time. How does a worthless mutation reliably grow, rather than shrink and become vestigial? The more sound theory would be that there are common ancestral archetypes, rather than all life having one ancestor.
Evolution is a fact, simple as.
>>539732420yep i look like that
>>539742249Imagine going to this level of pilpul, but accepting "magic" as a more plausible origin of life.
>>539732420Deal with it.
>>539732420Pekka you just went full evengelitard, that's a whale ancestor
>>539742410You seem to be confused. I'm the one who actually cares enough about science to ask questions and do research. You're the blind superstitious bumpkin who has a devotional attachment to his prejudices.
>>539742249So you are an atheist.
>>539742310The bloodlines of Jesus starting from Adam have more historical truth than your evolutionary evidence.
>>539742488I'm literally an ex-Christian that left because the creationism arguments were total bullshit that didn't make any sense. I am willing to bet money that you're a high schooler. I went through a phase that was exactly like how you are now.
>>539742585You will always be an idiot. You stupid bitch
>>539742579>some bronze-age kikes wrote some things down once and every word of it is truelol. lmao.
>>539742662Someone that actually care will do that. You don't care, so your bloodline is nothing but lost.
>>539742492Doesn't really matter either way as far as evolution is concerned, because even if all life did stem from a single celled ancestor that still doesn't answer the question of where that single celled ancestor came from. That's a whole different theory, so in my view it's pretty absurd for evolution to become a religious battleground in either direction. Christians have no reason to resent Darwin, and Darwinites have no business claiming that they've refuted Christianity. The two don't contradict each other or overlap in any way because Darwin's theories end where ontology begins. Darwin's theories should stand on their own merits, and the more people prop it up for no reason other than they think of it as a way to attack religious people, the weaker Darwin's theories look to an objective mind. Anyone who has skin in the game isn't a real scientist, basically.
