[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: downhilljewcandles.png (45 KB, 1156x829)
45 KB PNG
The largest IPO of all time is down only
Korea is in total collapse
The AI fraud has run its course
We are so broke, we can't even afford to do WW3 even though everyone wants to kill each other

It's over
>>
>>539746547
I'm perfect.
>>
>>539746547
If you had only bought into Leaf communications companies, you could have avoided this fate.
>always invest in Leaf
>always prosper
>>
It's Joever
>>
>>539746547
comfy, all my ammo and silver still good
>>
>>539746547
looks like its bottoming out here boys get in or get fucked.
>>
>>539746630
it's going below $100
it's going below $1T mcap (~$76)
>>
space ex was literally a scam for private investors get liquidity to dump on retards lol, get fucked you dumb niggers
>>
>>539746547
It's starting to form a rounding bottom. Good time to buy
>>
>>539746858
It made another low yesterday. That's not a rounding bottom. You're just knife catching.
>>
Greedy faggots tried to play like its penny stocks but with expensive shit.
>>
>>539746858
At some point it will likely go into an accumulation pattern and that's right around the time it will fall through the floor again lol, truly ogre
>>
>>539746547
Why did saar redeem?
>>
I have spent all money on buy, i will wait now
>>
File: 1659542798303123.jpg (150 KB, 1024x1024)
150 KB JPG
>>539746858
>>
1st report next week
that's also the day the lockup expires
I seriously doubt Elon will convince them to flee
So either he has something up his sleeve or he'll pretend he does to get stock back to ipo price after lockup expiration
Then who knows? I see Tesla and Space X merging eventually.
Spaceships and EV autos are actually AI and robots on the march
>>
>>539747246
SpaceX is worthless. It's literally twitter, which he ruined, and his shitty AI. He bundled it with the space scam so he could tell people he would build data centers in space (obviously retarded).
>>
>>539746547
>We are so broke, we can't even afford to do WW3 even though everyone wants to kill each other
WWIII is happening now whether we can afford it or not
>>
File: spacex_tam_by_segment.png (81 KB, 1094x676)
81 KB PNG
>>539747362
It's more or less just AI
>>
File: 1779894635556404.jpg (166 KB, 1200x720)
166 KB JPG
>>539747246
>I seriously doubt Elon will convince them to flee
>So either he has something up his sleeve or he'll pretend he does to get stock back to ipo price after lockup expiration
that has been his whole schtick for 15 years now, he sustained Tesla at 10x overvaluation for 15 years with a PT Barnum act of rallying the suckers and rubes with wild promises, now he is trying the same playbook with SpaceX but the suckers and rubes may be catching on
>>
>>539746547
>We are so broke, we can't even afford to do WW3 even though everyone wants to kill each other
>It's over

Excellent.
>>
>>539746547
It’s a K economy, lots of people still have money. Homes are selling. Products are moving.

The “AI bubble” is a trillion dollars worth of tax funding dumped on chip companies that have simplified and streamlined production lines and sold out nonstop for 4 years. There’s nothing to burst because the growth is backed up my increased hardware sales.
>>
>>539747030
>>539746949
I said starting. That new low seems to have been bought pretty aggressively, that's a good sign. Isn't the FOMC this week ? We'll see what the new chair says. I think the talk about hiking rates is over because inflation is under control and it keeps going down. If he's going to be dovish, things will turn around.
>>
I told you faggots to buy bonds last week
>>
>>539748011
Just bee careful. SpaceX was already threatened with nationalization due to national security importance during the Nasa debate.
Change of admin etc. can be risky.
>>
>>539746547
>we can't even afford to do WW3 even though everyone wants to kill each other

Why can't we just start killing each other at home, and then work our way up?
>>
>>539746580
>laughs in Nortel
>>
>>539748228
>Stay home and kill yourself
WWIII is very ecofrenly
>>
>>539748212
>spacex nationalized
lmao the only reason the US govt broadly has access to more than like 3 LEO flights a year and maybe 1 GEO flight is because spacex exists helmed by that sperg musk. Northrup can't make SRBs that don't shit their bells out and lose 30% performance on 50% of launches. Lockheed, Boeing and Lockheed/Boeing (ULA) struggle to get their heads out of their asses long enough to build anything at all that flies reliably more than once or twice a year. Rocketlab is really the only legit alternative but Electron can only carry small payloads to LEO and miniscule payloads to GEO with their kickstage. BO may be an alternative eventually but they're having teething issues with NG reflecting where spacex was over a decade ago so it remains to be seen if they can figure things out at a faster pace once they rebuild their launchpad after they fucking nuked it with that booster static fire the other month. ESA's Ariane is great for GEO flights but it costs a fortune to build the rocket alone and the costs associated with getting a payload to the remote launchpad means a load of shit just doesn't make any sense to try to launch on that platform.

Falcon 9 is the only thing granting govt hardware a remotely economical path to orbit and if they ever nationalized spacex it'd be a year or two before falcon's launch cadence was looking like ULA's Vulcan. The fucks in govt are dumb but they're not that dumb.
>>
>>539747566
>suckers and rubes
im not a tesla or elon fan, but it's not accurate to call TSLA holders suckers and rubes in light of the fact they made huge money and there wasnt realy a counterparty (aside from shorts, to a small degree) who lost money. and TSLA is a real company that earns real profit. he faked it till he maked it. even if TSLA traded at a reasonable valuation today (instead of 100x+ p/e), it would still be a multi-billion-dollar company.
>>
>>539748650
>houston, the payload has self-bukkaked
>>
>>539746547
Looks like a buy to me.
>>
>>539746547
When are you buying? I'm in at 60. Ther fraud banksters HSBC have admitted that the actual true value of SpaceX is somewhere around where it is now, their initial valuation was based on the "Elon" factor that doubled the actual valuation price at listing, these cunts actually said that, a complete fraud that ripped off countless fuckheads.
>>
>>539749566
>the elon factor
the 'elon factor' was him going to wall street and telling them "you'll sell it at 150 and you'll like it" lol
>>
>>539748650
>nuclear weapon powered rocket failure false flag
>>
>>539746547
Apparently, the operational lifetime of a Starlink satellite is less than five years. That raises serious questions about whether the business model can support sustainable long-term growth.

The system may be strategically valuable for military and government applications, but as a public investment, the underlying economics appear less convincing.

Starlink must continually launch replacement satellites simply to maintain its existing service, meaning substantial capital expenditure is built permanently into the model. The network is not a durable asset that can operate indefinitely with limited reinvestment; it steadily deteriorates unless new money is continuously spent.

The technology may improve, but this cycle of replacement resembles planned obsolescence at an infrastructure scale. That is one reason I suspect a public listing could be used to transfer much of the financial risk to retail investors—turning them into bag holders for a company that is technologically impressive but not necessarily a sound investment at an inflated valuation.

There is also considerable key-person risk. Much of the company’s valuation, public confidence and strategic direction remains concentrated around Elon Musk. Defence contracts may help support the economics, but governments could also fund alternative satellite networks, encourage competitors and reduce their dependence on a single private provider. Greater competition would likely improve resilience while lowering costs.

For those reasons, I believe Starlink could be substantially overvalued and that its eventual market price may fall considerably below the initial public valuation to around $30 per share.
>>
File: lelus.png (81 KB, 879x676)
81 KB PNG
>>539746580
>11% dividend



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.