There would be no America without IsraelWho do you worship? Think about that before you take another step towards chaos.
Get educated
>>539770877>>539770982Christkikes will defend this.
He's 6,000,000% correct.The real holocaust was the Native American and bloodthirsty genocidal kikes did that.
>>539770877What exactly is christian about the DoI and Constitution?
it's based on roman republic
>>539771132Ahhhh,so that xplains why its finishing just like that rotten empire. XD
>>539770877Eat shit you KUNT kike
>>539770877I thought we copied the Greeks who copied the Babylonians who copied the Sumerians. The Heebs copied the Babylonians. The Old Testament is basically just a Family Guy episode made from the cultures before them.
>>539770877Netenyahoo is dead. Bitch McDonald's is dead.
>>539770877here you go golem
>>539770877 Didn't judeo-bolshevik claim the same thing about the soviet union or russia? An technically if you think of nuke policies in a certain like say Pollard then he isn't 'lying' persay
>>539772977>cope image full of lies and psuedohistory kekJesus was JewishJesus of Nazareth was a first-century Judean Jew. He was circumcised on the eighth day (Luke 2:21), observed Jewish festivals (Passover, Sukkot), taught in synagogues, debated Torah interpretation with Pharisees and scribes, and was addressed as “Rabbi.” The New Testament repeatedly identifies him and his family within the people of Israel/Judah. The Greek term Ioudaios (Ἰουδαῖος) in the period means “Judean” or “Jew”; it does not create a racial-vs-religious distinction that removes Jesus from Jewish identity. Claims that “Jew” is a 17th-century mistranslation inventing a non-Judean identity are linguistic nonsense, the term tracks continuous usage from the Persian period onward.Judaism is continuous with the religion of Israel / HebraismSecond Temple Judaism (the religion Jesus practiced) developed directly from the religion of the Hebrew Bible/Tanakh after the Babylonian exile. The return under Cyrus, the rebuilding of the Temple, the canonization of scripture, and the rise of groups such as the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes are all internal developments within that tradition. Rabbinic Judaism later crystallized around the Mishnah and Talmud; it is an evolution of Pharisaic approaches, not a “Babylonian invention” that severs continuity. The claim that the Talmud “marks the end of Hebraism and the beginning of Judaism” is a 19th–20th-century polemical invention, not a historical description.
>>539773573Jews are Israelites / descendants of the people of Judah/IsraelGenetic, archaeological, linguistic, and historical evidence shows continuous Jewish populations in the Levant and diaspora communities that maintain Levantine ancestry mixed with local admixture, exactly what population genetics predicts for a people with a long diaspora history. The “Edomite conversion” theory (and the related Khazar theory) has been repeatedly falsified. Edomites were absorbed in limited numbers under the Hasmoneans; they did not replace the Judean population. Modern Jews are not “Edomites from Esau.” The red-text conclusion in the poster is a classic blood-and-soil conspiracy claim, not scholarship.Jesus practiced the Judaism of his timeHe observed Torah commandments, quoted the Prophets as authoritative, and operated inside the spectrum of Second Temple Jewish debate. His sharp criticism of certain Pharisees (e.g., Matthew 23, John 8) is intra-Jewish polemic of the sort common among competing Jewish groups (Essenes, Zealots, etc.). It is not evidence that he stood outside Judaism or that “Pharisees = modern Jews = synagogue of Satan.” The Gospel of John’s use of “the Jews” is a late-first-century literary convention reflecting community conflict; it does not redefine the ethnicity or religion of Jesus or the apostles.
>>539773573>NOOOO! you are not supposed to use historic documents you are supposed to be a golemkill yourself nigger
>>539773640DNA says no, now go be a golem somewhere else
>>539773772This is the same antisemitic conspiracy theory recycled with different proof-texts. It misreads the New Testament, invents an ethnic origin for the Pharisees, and reverses the actual historical sequence.The Bible quotes are contextually twisted:John 8:44: Jesus is speaking to a specific group of Judeans who are trying to kill him and who claim Abraham as their father while rejecting his message. In the heated intra-Jewish dispute of the Fourth Gospel, he says “you are of your father the devil.” This is sharp polemical language common in Second Temple Jewish literature (see the Dead Sea Scrolls’ “sons of darkness,” or the polemics between different Jewish sects). It is not a blanket ethnic declaration that “Jews = children of Satan.” The same Gospel has Jesus affirm that “salvation is from the Jews” (John 4:22) and that he is the King of the Jews.Revelation 2:9 and 3:9: The phrase “synagogue of Satan” refers to local groups in Smyrna and Philadelphia who are slandering the Christian communities and claiming to be Jews while (in the author’s view) they are not. Most scholars see this as conflict with non-Christian Jews or with Judaizing opponents in those specific cities in the late first century. It is not a universal statement about the Jewish people or about modern Judaism.Using these verses to declare all Jews satanic is the same selective proof-texting that has been used for centuries to justify persecution. It ignores the rest of the New Testament, in which Jesus, the apostles, and the earliest church are Jewish.
>>539773772>The Pharisees were not EdomitesThis claim is pure invention.The Pharisees emerged in the second century BCE as a Jewish movement emphasizing oral tradition, resurrection, and careful observance of Torah. They were one of several Jewish groups (alongside Sadducees, Essenes, Zealots, etc.) competing over how to live as Jews under foreign rule. Josephus, the New Testament, and the later rabbinic literature all treat them as Jews. There is zero historical evidence that they were Edomites, Amalekites, or Canaanites who “forced conversion” and then invented an Oral Law to smuggle in idolatry. The forced conversion of Idumeans (Edomites) under John Hyrcanus is a real but limited event; it did not replace the Jewish population or create the Pharisaic movement.The name “Pharisee” (from Aramaic pərīšā, “separated”) refers to their emphasis on ritual purity and separation from what they considered impure practices—not to ethnic separation from Israel.Historical sequence is the opposite of the claimThe religion of Israel (Torah, Prophets, Temple, covenant) long predates Jesus.Second Temple Judaism (the matrix in which Jesus lived) is the direct continuation of that religion.The Pharisees were one stream within it.After the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, Pharisaic/rabbinic approaches became the dominant surviving form of Judaism and developed into the Mishnah and Talmud.Christianity began as a Jewish messianic movement that eventually included Gentiles and, over time, defined itself over against non-Christian Judaism.Christianity did not pre-exist Judaism; it arose from Second Temple Judaism. The idea that “Judaism is a collection of blasphemies and heresies of Christianity” is chronological nonsense.
>>539773896>DNA is wrong so the more proof the more likely it is fake!ok golem
>>539770877america was founded as a secular nation, "in God we Trust" was a grafting that came much later.
>>539773852This claim is false. There is no Johns Hopkins genetic study that found “97.5% of Judaics living in Israel have absolutely no ancient Hebrew DNA” while “80% of Palestinians carry ancient Hebrew DNA.”What the claim actually misrepresents:The meme recycles a distortion of a 2012 paper by Eran Elhaik (then at Johns Hopkins) titled “The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses” (Genome Biology and Evolution).Elhaik’s study examined Ashkenazi Jews (primarily European Jewish populations) and argued for a significant Khazar/Caucasus component alongside other ancestries.It did not test Jews living in Israel.It did not produce the 97.5% or 80% figures.Elhaik himself has stated that the viral claim misrepresents his work and is false.What actual genetic research shows:Multiple peer-reviewed studies using autosomal DNA, Y-chromosome, and mitochondrial data reach a consistent picture:Jewish populations (Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Mizrahi, etc.) share substantial Levantine/Middle Eastern ancestry with each other and with other Levantine groups, including Palestinians, Druze, Bedouin, and Lebanese.Ashkenazi Jews also have significant European admixture (as expected from a diaspora population that lived in Europe for centuries).Palestinians likewise show continuity with ancient Levantine populations, plus later admixture.Both groups cluster genetically closer to each other and to other Middle Eastern populations than either does to most Europeans or other distant groups.There is no scientific basis for the idea that modern Jews as a whole lack ancient Levantine ancestry, or that Palestinians uniquely possess “the real Hebrew DNA” while Jews do not. Shared ancestry between Jews and Palestinians is one of the better-replicated findings in population genetics of the region.
>>539774063ok golem
>>539774042These three quotes are either fabricated, heavily distorted, or taken out of context to push the same false claim you’ve been shown: that modern Jews are not connected to the ancient Israelites.1. “Jews began to call themselves ‘Hebrews and Israelites’ in 1860.” — Judaica Encyclopedia 1971This quote does not appear in the Encyclopaedia Judaica. No such statement exists in the 1971 edition (or later ones). It is a fabricated citation that circulates almost exclusively in antisemitic and Black Hebrew Israelite materials. Jews have continuously used the terms Hebrew (Ivri), Israelite (Yisrael), and Jew (Yehudi) for centuries, long before 1860. The terms appear throughout the Hebrew Bible, Second Temple literature, the New Testament, rabbinic texts, and medieval Jewish writings.
>>5397741712. “Esau-Edom is modern Jewry.” — 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 5, page 41This is also false. The actual Jewish Encyclopedia (1901–1906, commonly misdated) entry on Edom discusses the biblical people descended from Esau, their territory, and later symbolic uses of “Edom” in Jewish literature (often as a stand-in for Rome or Christianity after the Temple’s destruction). It does not say that modern Jews are Edomites.The claim is a classic inversion used by Christian Identity and related groups: they take the rabbinic symbolic identification of Edom with Rome/Christianity and flip it to claim Jews are the Edomites. No reputable historical or genetic evidence supports this.3. “Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.” — Jewish Almanac 1980, p. 3This one is closer to a real passage. The 1980 Jewish Almanac contains a short popular article (“Identity Crisis: A Brief History of the Terms for Jew”) that notes the historical development of the terms:“Hebrew” is the earliest designation.“Israelite” refers to the descendants of Jacob/Israel.“Jew” (Yehudi) originally meant a member of the kingdom/tribe of Judah and later became the general term after the Babylonian exile, when the surviving community was centered on Judah.The author is making a narrow linguistic/historical point about how the words shifted in meaning over time. He is not claiming that modern Jews are unrelated to ancient Israelites. That is a deliberate misreading. The same almanac and every standard Jewish reference work affirm the historical continuity of the Jewish people with ancient Israel.
>>539774171why is dna testing illegal on Israel golem?
>>539774116Well it must be true since Fateswebb said it in the forums.Produce the study faggot
why are golems like this?
>>539774270ok golem
>>539774221>why is dna testing illegal on Israel golem?it isn't, faggotthey really arent sending their best are they?
>>539770877He's obviously retarded and brown. Only a retard would believe that the US wouldn't exist without some British micro colony. Ants (insects) had a better impact on the US than Israel ever could in any generation unironically.
>>539771132>we built it wrong as a jokehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2D-4zgezQE4
>>539774332Jesus was a Jew by both ancestry and the religion of his time. The claims in the provided text are a mix of selective biblical reading, anachronisms, and longstanding fringe theories that contradict mainstream historical, linguistic, archaeological, and genetic evidence.Ancestry:The New Testament genealogies (Matthew 1 and Luke 3) place Jesus in the line of David, of the tribe of Judah. “Jew” (Greek Ioudaios, Hebrew Yehudi) originally meant a person of Judah/Judea and, after the Babylonian exile, became the standard term for the people of Israel who returned and continued the covenantal religion centered on the Temple and Torah.Jacob/Israel’s sons founded the tribes; Judah was one of them. After the northern kingdom fell, the southern kingdom of Judah and its returning exiles carried the identity forward. Jesus is repeatedly situated in that Judean/Jewish matrix: born in Bethlehem of Judea, raised in Nazareth under Jewish law, circumcised on the eighth day (Luke 2), presented in the Temple, observing Passover and other festivals.The claim that “Jews” were primarily Edomites forcibly converted by John Hyrcanus is a distortion. Hyrcanus did conquer and convert Idumeans (Edomites) in the late 2nd century BCE; some Idumeans (notably Herod’s family) rose to power. That does not mean the Judean population as a whole, or the people Jesus addressed in Galilee and Judea, were Edomites. Second Temple sources, archaeology, and later genetic studies of Jewish populations show continuity with earlier Levantine Israelites, not wholesale replacement by Edomites.Jesus’ own reported words about “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” and “my sheep” operate inside Jewish eschatological and prophetic language; they do not redefine the ethnoreligious identity of Judeans as non-Israelite.
>>539770877The synagogue of satan, the children of the devil as Jesus called your pharisee leaders who wrote the talmud (which states they outargued God btw) WILL be cast out into the dark. Where you can kvetch freely while the world celebrates with the Lord.39 “Abraham is our father,” they answered.“If you were Abraham’s children,” said Jesus, “then you would[c] do what Abraham did. 40 As it is, you are looking for a way to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things. 41 You are doing the works of your own father.”“We are not illegitimate children,” they protested. “The only Father we have is God himself.”42 Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come here from God. I have not come on my own; God sent me. 43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. 44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
>>539770877They really keep pushing hard the judeo-christian meme these days
>>539774348ok golemhttps://www.gov.il/he/pages/poriut09
>>539774444ReligionJesus practiced and taught within Second Temple Judaism. He debated Pharisees and Sadducees over interpretation of Torah and tradition, attended synagogue, quoted the Hebrew scriptures as authoritative, and framed his mission in terms of Israel’s God and covenants. The “Tradition of the Elders” he criticized was an intra-Jewish dispute over oral interpretive traditions, not evidence that he stood outside Judaism.“Judaism” as a label and the later rabbinic literature (Mishnah, Talmud) developed after the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. Calling the religion of Jesus “Hebrewism” versus “Judaism” is anachronistic. The religion of the Hebrew Bible / Old Testament is continuous with the Second Temple forms Jesus knew; the post-70 rabbinic developments are a later stage of the same tradition.Contemporary sources (Josephus, the New Testament itself, Dead Sea Scrolls milieu) treat Jesus and his earliest followers as Jews. The Samaritan woman in John 4:9 explicitly calls him a Jew; Paul describes him as “born under the law” and “of the seed of David according to the flesh.”
>>539774444ok golem
>>539770877in a way you need the bankers who have been siphoning capital in and out of your country for centuriesin a way bankers need you golems to do their biddingyou are both parasites tho
>>539774474>still calling me the golem when i've already posted definitive proof that you worship a literal jewish rabbiyou are absolutely mind broken
>>539774486ok golem
>>539774466Because if enough christians wake up to the original views of the children of the devil the kikes would be left nationless and outcasts once again. For, tell me, is not the dwelling place of demons a place of impiety even if no god's statue stands there? Here the slayers of Christ gather together, here the cross is driven out, here God is blasphemed, here the Father is ignored, here the Son is outraged, here the grace of the Spirit is rejected. Does not greater harm come from this place since the Jews themselves are demons? In the pagan temple the impiety is naked and obvious; it would not be ease to deceive a man of sound and prudent mind or entice him to go there. But in the synagogue there are men who say they worship God and abhor idols, men who say they have prophets and pay them honor. But by their words they make ready an abundance of bait to catch in their nets the simpler souls who are so foolish as to be caught of guard.(4) So the godlessness of the Jews and the pagans is on a par. But the Jews practice a deceit which is more dangerous. In their synagogue stands an invisible altar of deceit on which they sacrifice not sheep and calves but the souls of men.
>>539774563>but the rabbi told meok golem
>>539771058Exactly
Jesus was an Aryan from Gaulilee you fucking kikes
>>539774466They fear that people will realize that the ethnostate of Israel fulfills all the signs of the antichrist
>>539774608you're a christian. stop posting anti-semitic content. you are committing heresy.jews are the chosen people. jesus was a rabbi.christ is king. a rabbi is your king.'jews created your religion.
>>539771132>it's based on roman republicmixed with egyptian mystery cults
>>539774751ok golem
>>539774792you worship a jew.jews are your god.
In the hebrew bible God tells jews it's ok to enslave the goyim. Fantastic western values.
>>539774851remember all historical data is wrong but we must believe the modern jew narrative, it\s a coincidence how only golems push it
>>539774919this doesnt change the fact that you worship a literal rabbi, golem.
>>539770877im tired of shithole countries like israel and india pushing those stupid fucking cones in place of where a normal fucking flag would be.
>>539770877He looks so evil
>>539775002>you worship the jew if you prove how they are not part of your religionok golem
>>539774751They are the chosen of satanWhich is why the satanic talmud that 99 percent of all religious jews observe state Jesus the nazarene is boiling in excrement in hell for daring to wish well for the goyim and compares him to other major figures in jewish historyKikes(literal cross haters) do not belong to God“We are not illegitimate children,” they protested. “The only Father we have is God himself.”42 Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come here from God. I have not come on my own; God sent me. 43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. 44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. 45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me! 46 Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don’t you believe me? 47 Whoever belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that you do not belong to God.”
Only morons believe in religious bullshit like Christianity.You use it as paradigm to try and justify your incel white supremacy and anti-science rhetoric through the guise of being sacred.
>>539773573Yet the jews killed christians in the most heinous way possible and always conspired against them. Rmember kikes were exempt from bringing offerings to roman gods evem if they were roman citizens while ethnic romans were persecuted tortured and murdered if they didn't. Also remember that time when jews purchased chriatian slaves from thw persians in order to kill them in such a horrendous way if they didn't recant that even persians infamous for their torture methods were shocked and disgusted and had to step in to reign in those psycopathic jews?Starnge! Almost like christians did something right if they caused so much seething among that the jews that jews had to invent a whole bundle of protestant cults in order to subvert it by bringing it closer to judaism. They even went the distance to falsify the original greek translation through the masoretes.
>>539770877THE GOAT OF ALL TIME!ROME GOT A THOUSAND YEAR REICH AND THEY DIDNT EVEN HAVE B2 BOMBERS
>>539770877Source on this "Hebrew Bible"?
lol the Americans are goymaxxing again
>>539775002repeat after me rabbi>jews are the synagogue of satan, the literal antichrist
>>539775142This page discusses the semantic range of the Greek term Ἰουδαῖοι (Ioudaioi) and the title βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων in the New Testament. It is a legitimate point of scholarly debate, but it does not support the earlier claim that Jesus was neither religiously nor ancestrally a Jew.The excerpt notes that in ordinary Palestinian usage of the time, the terms were not always synonymous in the broadest sense, and that the Roman title on the cross is better understood in a narrower geographic or ethno-geographic sense:“King of Judea” or “King of the Judeans” rather than a sweeping “King of the Jews” that automatically includes every member of the people in the widest possible sense.Pilate appears to have applied the title thinking of Jesus as a Judean figure within his own jurisdiction (or initially misunderstanding the scope).In some contexts, Ἰουδαῖος is more precisely rendered “Judean” (someone associated with the territory or people of Judea) than the modern English word “Jew.”This reflects real linguistic and historical nuance. Ancient Greek Ἰουδαῖος could carry:Geographic meaning (inhabitant of Judea),Ethnic meaning (member of the people whose ancestral homeland was Judea),Or the developing religious-ethnic identity centered on the God of Israel, the Torah, and the Temple.Modern scholars (Steve Mason, Daniel R. Schwartz, Adele Reinhartz, and others) continue to debate when “Jew” versus “Judean” is the better English rendering, especially in the Gospel of John and in Roman administrative contexts.
>>539775302What it does not mean:Preferring “Judean” or “King of the Judeans” in certain passages does not remove Jesus from the people and religion of Israel:Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea, raised in Galilee under the ancestral laws and customs of that people, circumcised, presented in the Temple, and participated in its festivals.His debates with Pharisees and others were intra-group disputes over the correct interpretation of Israel’s scriptures and traditions.The earliest followers and the New Testament writers themselves situate him inside that same people. Even if one consistently translates Ἰουδαῖος as “Judean,” Jesus remains a Judean of the house of David, operating entirely within Second Temple Jewish life.The later English word “Jew” developed from exactly this Judean identity after the exile and the destruction of the Temple. The continuity is historical, not a modern invention.The earlier document’s stronger claims—that “Jews” were essentially Edomites, that Jesus belonged to a separate “Israelite/Hebrew” religion opposed to “Judaism,” and that he was therefore not a Jew by ancestry or religion—remain unsupported. Those claims rely on selective readings, anachronistic separations between “Hebrewism” and “Judaism,” and the old fringe theory equating post-exilic or modern Jews with Edomites. The page you have shared is engaged in careful philological discussion of Greek usage; it is not advancing that theory.In short: the title is accurately understood as “King of the Judeans/Judea” in its Roman and local setting, and Ἰουδαῖος often benefits from the translation “Judean.” That precision still places Jesus firmly inside the Judean/Jewish people and the Second Temple form of Israel’s ancestral religion. It does not turn him into a non-Jew.you worship a rabbi, golem
The 21ste century will be the downfall of the American empire followed by a global pogrom
>>539775302repeat after me chatgprabbi,>jews are the synagogue of satan, the literal antichrist
>>539775407there is no way that cap says that
>>539775300>>539775411purposefully taking a quote out of context doesnt mean you dont worship a literal rabbi, christgolem.
>>539774751>jews are the chosen peopleyou just exposed yourself rabbiCatholic Church does not in fact recognize Jews as the chosen people
>>539770877Judaism is from 500AD, long after the burning of the second temple, and is predated by Christianity by half a millenia.Judaism owes its existence to Christians.
>>539775294Stolen from Persian Zoroastrianism when Cyrus freed them
>>539775411This anon is correct. Even a cursory investigation of the talmud reveals how much of a satanic inversion it is of the torah by"interpreting" and loophole seeking and straight up making up new vile bs it is. Far worse than the golden plates of mormonism because at least mormons dont lie and pretend theyve outargued God
>>539775458I see you avoided the the question just like you avoided all the evidencerepeat after me chatgprabbi,>jews are the synagogue of satan, the literal antichrist
>>539774444So you’re saying Jesus isn’t the Son of God…
>>539775488why do christians not even understand their own religion? are you all retarded? do you not read your own holy books? lmaoOfficial Catholic teaching since the Second Vatican Council does recognize the Jewish people as remaining God’s chosen people in the sense of an irrevocable covenant.Nostra Aetate (Vatican II, 1965), §4:“Nevertheless, God holds the Jews most dear for the sake of their Fathers; He does not repent of the gifts He makes or of the calls He issues—such is the witness of the Apostle [Romans 11:28-29]. … Although the Church is the new people of God, the Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as if this followed from the Holy Scriptures.”Catechism of the Catholic Church (839):“When she delves into her own mystery, the Church, the People of God in the New Covenant, discovers her link with the Jewish People, ‘the first to hear the Word of God.’ The Jewish faith, unlike other non-Christian religions, is already a response to God’s revelation in the Old Covenant. To the Jews ‘belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ’ [Rom 9:4-5]; ‘for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable’ [Rom 11:29].”Pope John Paul II repeatedly called the Jewish people “the people of the Covenant” and stated that the covenant “has never been revoked.” Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later Benedict XVI) likewise taught that God has not retracted His word that Israel is the chosen people, and that hard supersessionism (the idea that the Church simply replaced the Jews as the chosen people) should be rejected.
>>539773952>The Pharisees emerged in the second century BCE as a Jewish movementof scribes opposing the elite priestly class.Oy vey we know the law better. After all we write it. KEK.Anyway they were all jews. Idumeans got either exterminated or forcibly converted.
>>539775569he is using ai, he doesn't realize how his posts make no sense
>>539770877The Hebrew bible is foundational to Christianity. The unsaid fact is that the Torah is an inconvenience to Rabbinical Judaism, which is a far cry from the Biblical religion, invented hundreds of years after Christ's death and the destruction of their temple. Rabbinical Jews are neither ethnically Jewish nor are they any more spiritually Jewish, in the biblical sense, than Mormons are spiritually Apostolic Christians.
>>539775544you're the one avoiding the evidence, christgolem.jesus jewish lineage in the literal bibleJesus has a Jewish lineage in the Bible that traces back through the tribe of Judah, Abraham, and King David. This ancestry is documented in two New Testament accounts: the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke.Abraham: Matthew starts his genealogy with Abraham, the father of the Jewish people, to show Jesus belongs to the covenant family.Tribe of Judah: Both accounts place Jesus in the line of Judah, fulfilling prophecies about the "Lion of the tribe of Judah".King David: Both lineages connect Jesus to King David, giving him the legal right to the royal line required for the Messiah.now repeat after me >I worship a literal kike rabbi
>>539770877America is IsraelIt's time to accept that
>>539775610>everyone is wrong but the jewskill yourself rabbi
>>539770877even as a reverse-psychology thread, it still makes you a fucking faggot predditor
>>539775514>pretend theyve outargued Godthis sums up Judaism. LMAO imagine believing you can outthink God
>>539770877>There would be no America without Israelyou mean texas. had they not chimped out, the US would have never gotten those gold rush states from mexico and would have not attract europeansno eaurpeans and no capital means no advancementall the jews did around that time in the us was scamming some fuckers
>>539770877I do fear he is right, and the secret undercurrent o the US and its founding fathers has always been the subversive mizraite rite and its esoteric zionism
>>539775730I see you avoided the the question just like you avoided all the evidencerepeat after me chatgprabbi,>jews are the synagogue of satan, the literal antichrist
>>539770877What are the values of which he speaks?
>>539770877>let me tell you about your country, goyim
>>539775812>copy pasting your own posts now after losing every single argumentlol. you lost tranny christgolem. i'm going to spend the rest of my day laughing at your pathetic existence now.
>>539770877> There would be no America without IsraelWe existed long before the shit sand state there today. If our existence is contingent upon being joined at the hip with those demons it isn’t worth it anyway
Hebrew Bible is codename for Talmud. That's just the sort of satanic subversion one can expect from the false jews of the synagogue of satan. Jesus Christ is King.
>>539770877Lies. The founding fathers of America were satanic freemasons who wanted to move away from Christianity.
>>539775888>gets proven wrong>runs his arguments through AI that make no sense>shits himself, starts seething and declares himself the winnersasuga rabbi, now repeat after me chatgprabbi,>jews are the synagogue of satan, the literal antichrist
>>539775888You can laugh but the false jews are still getting your mutt foreskins
>>539770877He’s right, it was the Jews that pushed back the British and broke the English naval barricade.
>>539776004>ChristianityFrom the Catholic Church in specific. Protestantism serves Freemasonic interests
>>539770877So the US founded by ancient Yaweh cult LARP as Christian
>>539776051>gets proven wrong multiple times>is low IQ, cant even understand a few basic sentences, therefore they make no sense to him>gets mad, doubles down, copes, seethesnow repeat after me, christgolem>I worship a literal jewish rabbi
>>539772977
>>539770877Oh look, more inversion of reality.
>>539776004>satanic freemasonsKek that's even more jewish than christianity
>>539770877
>>539776192>priest of El Elyion from the order of melchizedek>having anything to do with jewish practicesjust for the record, the only reason christianity uses the old testament and some SPECIFIC gospels is because they believed the lie told by jews that the samaritans were not israelitesthe samaritans only have the first five books, the rest of the OT was jewish fanfiction yet it was the samaritans the only group that expected jesus. how curiouschristianity has those specific gospels because marcion compiled them first and marcion was all about how the OT God has nothing yo do with Jesus' God. The Church took and edited his work
>>539770877this asshole has been running his mouth for decades, he says what's convenient.He's been telling us for decades that Iran is mere weeks away from a nuclear bomb.Why are all right wingers mentally ill? And what should we do about it?Show me a right winger who isn't mentally ill (you can't). Bushes both fucked the country up. Trump fucked the country up. Reagan fucked the country up. Nixon was a fuckup. And so on.It almost like these losers are solely interested in using government power to protect themselves and their small group of asshole friends. War criminals, all of them.
>>539774751>you're a christian. stop posting anti-semitic content. you are committing heresy.It's not.>jews are the chosen people. for destructionjesus was a rabbi.>Christ is king. of Kingsa rabbi is your king.'God Incarnate is King of All including you.>jews created your religion.God Incarnate gave us our religion.Cope ans seethe.
>>539775610
>>539775610Nope. Once the Old Convenant was superseded by The New Convenant all former provisions pertaining jews are void and null and any subject clinging to said Old Convenant is doomed and other utterly btfo.
>>539774751
>>539776192What do you want?
>>539770877Why do jews lie so much? Is lying not a sin in judaism?
>>539775458>purposefully taking a quote out of contextIt doesn't. They literally are the synagogue of satan irrespective of context. Stop projecting.
>>539777903In the Old Testament yes,but not in the Talmud
>>539777903>Why do jews lie so much?They are the sons of their father who is the father of lies. He was a liar and a murderer from the begining.> Is lying not a sin in judaism?Probably only to other jews but even then they probably have to tell the truth in a twisted cryptic manner.
>>539771048if someone is religious they have no critical thinking
>>539778102Huh. How convenient.
>>539770877no legit artifacts of anything Christian, Muslim or Jewish exist that date prior to 1000AD.Everything fits neatly into a few silos:1)Pagan symbols that pre-date even 1000BC.2)clearly frauds, and very limited in number where such items should be common (Dead Sea Scrolls, etc)3)Not actually of the religion claimed and/or mistranslated (New Testament "fragments", mention of "Israel" on a stone, a drawing of a horse headed figure on a scarecrow, etc) To see what actual cultures leave behind, consider Mayan ruins. There are so many intact yet to be examined temples, completely sealed since about 700AD, that no one even have an estimate on how long it will take to even catalog them. And Mayans were basic "Neo-lithic" stone agers, without 10% of the per capita industrial output of Europe or Middle East.In other news, while we do have "fresh frozen" Woolly Mammoths in Siberia, no recent remains of Dinosaurs have been found.
>>539770877agree
kek..
