/pol/ and Internet Reactionaries told me this guy was a Proto-SJW>"... justice gives every man a title to the product of his honest industry, and the fair acquisitions of his ancestors descended to him...">First Treatise of Government; Chapter IV, Paragraph 44I can't imagine any SJW saying White Men have a right to the, quote,>"acquisitions of his ancestors"today.
>>539777546Locke was based and the only people who hate enlightenment philosophers are christcuck faggots because they were the first to call christcuckery into question
>>539777546people also told me Jean Bastiat was just a pozzed free marketer and then I read The Law where he denounces government borrowing and central banks
>>539777546maoist anti intellectualism and jewish psychology have a combined dialectic that routinely captures mob christians thereby creating an anti enlightenment sentiment throughout the west
>>539778014Not even all the Enlightenment thinkers were Anti-Christianity tho. Even Thomas Paine, the edgiest of them all on that point, still accepted and used the Creation account in one of his most important works, "The Rights of Man," to justify natural rights. Locke, even, argues from Genesis against Robert Filmer in the book I've quoted above.
>>539778094jewish academics lied to you about your historic philosophers, bored you to tears with stale trivia all through public school to convince you that you knew what they taught and then encouraged you to hero-worship effete aliens instead of rallying around your actual blood-and-soil.Shocking behavior, I know. Kikes would never!
>>539778325They're not even Maoists or any other fancy word. They're Anti-White subversives trying to weaken your national identity every way that they can. Making you hate and discredit your own sages is part of that.
Anglo “philosophy” amounted to whatever is in the interests of the east India company.
>>539778564it took force for the aforementions dissenters to take their positions of mass influence and effort large scale anti enlightenment sentiments, if i were wrong, it would be evident among mainstream intellectuals that enlightenment work is substantially conducive to the future of western civilization and the philosophies necessary to its providence
Imagine being an empiricist. Top kek.
>>539778736You wouldn't know, Ahmed. You've never read any of them.
>>539778818Enlightenment Philosophy is actually Based, that's the thing. It actually has power, inspires you and tells you>hey if your government isn't working for you then you know you can just fucking replace it with force, right?That's why the jew suppresses it and wants to funnel you into dead-end fascism, nazism, communism or anything else that basically leaves you sitting on your fucking hands waiting for someone to take charge of your life for you and saves you.The Enlightnment teaches you that the legitimacy of government and the power of the state is vested in YOU, White Man. Your nation is YOUR'S, and YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. Not the responsibility of some beauracrat nepo-baby who's little better than the Versailles-dwelling fops of the late 18th century.They don't want you reading these guys or thinking they have anything good to say.If you'r even really American, go read, "The American Crisis." If that doesn't make you wanna water the Tree of Liberty nothing will.
>>539778831Yeah man lets be like teepee niggers and do everything off vibes instead of what we can observe really works and prove by rational argument.You have the spirit of a nigger however White your skin is.
>>539779327>rational argument >vibesYou don’t know the difference between rationalism and empiricism do you? Imagine thinking your fallible sensory perceptions could be the source of knowledge. Read some Leibniz and grow up.
>>539779512Are mathematical measurements and scientific data, "fallible sensory perceptions?"
>>539779296>Young Thomas JeffersonMaybe one of the most shocking things about the American Revolution in a modern context is the ages of the Founders. Jefferson was 33 in 1776. Monroe, Burr, Madison and Hamilton all age 25 or below. Washington was 44. What's the age of our modern leadership? 60s, 70s, 80s. Gerontocracy.
>>539779632How many centimeters I say the length of a triangle is would be irrelevant to the fact that a^2+b^2=c^2. The truth of the Pythagorean theorem is a priori of my ability to measure the triangle. It works whether or not I measure it at all.so the measurement is not the source of my knowledge of the triangle. Again, you don’t understand the difference between rationalism and empiricism.
>>539780016>i can rationally square the circle and prove that god says youre wrong
>>539780016A good point. I may be a midwit here. Thanks for the info.
