>>539801201Yeah how foolish, tax money should be spent on ballrooms
>>539801201So it's ok to steal it?
>>539801201i'd rather my tax money pay for the food of the needy than to feed the unquenchable greed of the pedophiles
>>539801201At least that money ain't going to Israel
>>539801201 >uses your own tax money to
>>539801290Absolutely based man right here
>>539801201>thats money we could spend on bailing bankers and israel and golden ballrooms for the epstein class!!!! Think of the benefits!!! they are job creators!!! lmao miggers
>>539801290
>>539801745>the average leftist can't possible come to the conclusion of just lowering taxes so people can spend their own money on whatever food they want instead of rebuying it from the government
>>539801201Do you live in New York City, State of New York?
>>539801248Hey Takahashi if you don't know what you're talking about just don't talk
>>539801201It's disgusting, all that money could be going to Israel
>>539801201
>>539802760Absolutely retarded take. It's as if personal responsibility and collective responsibility are excluding each other as a binary choice, when an individual in a society ought to respect both.The whole supermarket policy is to create competition to lower prices. It's not even socialist. It's obviously social democratic economic policy and we'll just have to see how effective it is. Most of it will depend on how it's implemented.If anyone here wants to seriously discuss it, it makes sense to compare countries, the amount of supermarkets and the regulatory actions of the government (local/national|federal).Tendentiously talking out of your ass is an option too, I guess...
>clarificationImo it's an interesting policy that merits a discussion, untainted by partisan and ideological framing, for the sole reason that groceries are so fundamental to everyone. Everyone needs a roof over their head and groceries.---Politics should mainly revolve around these topics; not cultural grievances and half-baked fairy tales about your economically underdeveloped rural region, that's supposedly going to be overrun by immigrants and troons.
>>539801290True. It should be going to corrupt politicians and immigrants here instead
>>539801201SOMEONE STOP THIS GOY
>>539803784>traitor lebanese nigga studied marketing or some shit like that.>apparently marketed himself as a token lebanese goy slave>calls himself culturally jewish like a good goy slaveJust goes to show that ethnicity and religion are just ploys. People who know better sell out for earthly gains because that's the only real thing. Let the plebs fight over abstract concepts while they grab everything of value. Works every time.
>>539803577this guy gets it
>>539803577>raises your taxes to lower pricesHow dumb are you?
>>539801248That's still cheaper
>>539802760there will be places where 'private enterprise" won't offer services because it's not "profitable enough" (and the "enough" gets cranked higher every quarter because "line go up")You want to leave those people without services? And those will be provided at a net loss, obviously, but value add to the whole society. Provide subsidized fresh food to everyone and obesity drops.
>>539807248You're the assuming it's this linear and simple. I'm not going to discuss tax policies in depth. The Scandinavian model has higher (progressive) taxation and the standards of living are better for the lowest tax bracket, you imbecile. Try to counter it but with actual thoughts and not political soundbites.>You probably want to look at Esping-Andersen and criticism of the classification itself or the conclusions drawn from it.
>>539807430>let me help youCommon takes include pointing at the population density or natural resources. Norway can _afford_ to be social democratic, some may argue. Finland has lots of land, resources and a low population density. Something like that.---There you go. Not super hard to poke holes in it. My argument wasn't to hype social democratic economic policy but to wait and see how it's implemented. It could work and have the effects it intends to have. Or it can fail and be a case-study of how to not implement it. People who pretend to know are mostly astroturfed political pawns.
