do you think a women can be just as competent in discernment as a man, putting aside their innate biological differences.
>>539805114>do you think a women can be just as competent in discernment as a manno i do not, which is not entirely their fault. they weren't created directly by God, but through man/adam which is why they can't be as spiritual/as discerning as men
>>539805331i think abrahamism is entirely composed of material lifted whole or partial cloth from other cultures and myths.i also think that both men and woman possess the same cognitive capabilities based on lived experience and not religious dogmai have encountered a lot of smart and stupid people of both sexes, i don't think generalizing one sex as intellectually inferior to another is healthy for the mental wellbeing of both
>>539805719>i think abrahamism is entirely composed of material lifted whole or partial cloth from other cultures and myths.your understanding and interpretation of it, for sure. not all types and versions of christianity are the same. you're aware that Jesus spoke against materialism/worldliness in the bible, correct? which means that any type/version of christianity that doesn't teach against materialism is going against Jesus' version of Christianity
>>539805935yes philo just copied plato and cratylus while blending messianic judaism elements into the narrativethis is all based on the writing, fragments really, of heraclitus and his contemporary parmenides.
>>539806464they could be, but the motive behind their philo and Jesus' teaching is entirely different. do you consider Jesus to be a nihilist, from your idea of Him? He was spiritual/non-materialistic because it's the "right" thing to do, not because He has something selfish to gain from it or not for self-improvement's sake. they're motives are entirely different imo
>>539805114No. Discernment is only gained when it becomes a requirement for survival. Womens' survival comes from their bodies being desired, not from their utility or usefulness.
>>539805114Yes.
>>539805719so you think there is no sexual difference in cognitive differences based on biology?
>>539808244cognitive capabilities*
>>539806859cratylus and plato had already introduced their own interpretations of heraclitus and parmenides which i mean given how little we have of heraclitus' writings left is not a gatcha for malicious intent or somethingi think philo had nothing but ill intent tho>>539806961>>539808244hormones are a huge factor which is why i wanted to focus on cognitive capability without hormones retarding the brainmen are just as easy, if not easier, to manipulate using hormones, specifically their sex drive
They can’t even admit they aren’t virginsSpoilers: if you tore open your hymen you have your menstrual cycle, which means you aren’t a virgin anymore. Every woman with a period is lying to you
>>539805114i dont know what discerment means but yes, i think women are quite capableproof: They have an iron grip on the dating market
God is a woman
They are incredible, in fiction.
>>539805114noany other stupid questions?
>>539805114>do you think a women can be just as competent in discernment as a man
>>539805114Yes there are extremes in everything but its rare. The average woman is a midwit at best. (And we love them fir it)
>>539808617I like them dumber than that. They need to be completely dependent on me to do even basic things.
>>539809333that's why i posted her, she would be intimidating to be with. apparently dhe was extremely clever, which i think is attractive but aspasia aptly demonstrated the paradox of love beyween a mam and a woman regarding the desire to have the best wife or husband. it means both should try to be the best they can for the other but folks say that's codependancy....
>>539808394Yea its an interesting topic without factoring in hormones. Seems like the differences between XX and XY hormone free are XX is better at broad synthesis and XY better at deep compartmentalization. However you wanna define that, I think you could agrue men are better at discernment because discernment is more aligned to deep compartmentalization.
>>539809562Having a relationship with a woman that is your equal sounds incredible. But if that isn't even possible isn't it better to be much more dominating than her?
>>539809591>>539809645so i think what i am driving at here is that without external validation all that remains is a 'thou shalt, thou shall not' from within which is incredibly flimsy, but clearly one can be lead astray by a partner with malicious intent or even with good intentwe improve ourselves not just for ourselves but for others even if for vanity or something shallow
>>539809645>equalsi think you both need to be supremely humane to make it work. I have a feeling that intelligence comes with negative traits making bearers prone to abusing others which makes this trait in women incompatible with men. Not that men dont abuse women that are less capable than them but im pretty sure its more pronounced in women for reasons i can not explain, going by my experiences alone
>>539805114Yeah. Both have the capacity for competence and incompetence. Most women are retarded though. Most men are retarded too, but a greater number of women are retarded.This post was brought to you by Niggerman sourdough bread. “Taste the Niggerman, be the Niggerman”
No. Though I don't have a good solution on how domesticate them into not wanting more power.https://youtu.be/bhyTtUcujQc
>>539805114
They asked Jesus If a woman's husband dies, and she remarries a second husband, who's wife will she be in heaven? Jesus laughed and said there are no women in heaven.
>>539810263are there femboys in heaven
>>539810136>Though I don't have a good solution on how domesticate them into not wanting more power.men or women?seriously though, i don't have a clean answer either.
>>539805114Definitely not.
>>539810136Gennarino vuole addomesticare a mugliera
Women don't think for themselves.They are go along to get along. Follow the herd. If you are a single guy, women don't want you. If you have a girlfriend, suddenly they are interested. Survey after survey for decades women answer "The most attractive men are married men" If you have a girlfriend, then you have collective "girl approval" if you dont have a girlfriend, then you must not be good enough.I ran into one of my sister's old friends, hadn't seen in years. We talked, and she revealed that all of my sisters friend's had a crush on me, but I was dating a 10, and they knew that they didn't stand a chance. No girl wants that kind of rejection. If I had been dating a 7 or 8 they would have made a move. They know their place in pecking order, but can't make a move without discussing it with their friends.This makes them highly susceptible to social media, advertising, television programming, movies, the news, the scienceOne of the most intelligent women i know, and went to school with, is a doctor. We were friends until covid. One minute we're laughing talking about the class reunion, the next I'm literally hitler for questioning the science, we haven't spoken since.
>>539805114Rare cases? Yes, obviously.Exceptions are more common in men, so there's simply a bigger pool to pick from.
>>539805114Name a female genius.Just 1.I'll wait.
>>539813149Candace Owens
>>539805114>putting aside their innate biological differencesOh, you mean a little detail like women having 17% fewer neurons and 33% fewer synapses, in their neocortex?"The average numbers of neocortical neurons were 19 billion in female brains and 23 billion in male brains, a 16% difference. In our study, which covered the age range from 20 years to 90 years, approximately 10% of all neocortical neurons are lost over the life span in both sexes. Sex and age were the main determinants of the total number of neurons in the human neocortex, whereas body size, per se, had no influence on neuron number." - ["Neocortical neuron number in humans: effect of sex and age" (1997)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9215725/)"Considering all layers, men also have a significant higher average synaptic density of 12.9 × 10^8 per cubic millimeter, whereas in women it was 8.6 × 10^8 per cubic millimeter. Thus, there was a 33% difference in synaptic density between men and women." - ["Gender differences in human cortical synaptic density" (2008)](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567215/)
>>539805114Only if you compare top 0.1% genius women with sub 60 IQ retarded men. If you make it a fair comparison where retards are compared with retards and geniuses with geniuses, with the only difference being sex, then women will always lose to men.
>>539816659In primal brain architecture, sex differences trace back to evolutionary survival roles. The male brain is traditionally optimized for intrahemispheric connectivity (linking perception directly to action) and possesses a larger amygdala for fast threat detection. Conversely, the female brain prioritizes interhemispheric communication and a larger hippocampus, favoring broader sensory processing and social bonding.
