[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9730.jpg (54 KB, 249x364)
54 KB JPG
Daily reminder that women should be property owned by her father until and if she is sold to a new owner.

Women’s only purpose is to incubate children and for civilization to progress we need to get over them and and treat them for what they are

Women are literally holding back man, it’s a great filter event and we are failing.

And before people call me an incel I’m married i have a daughter and I fucked plenty of girls in my younger days
>>
File: 1771576358672640.jpg (52 KB, 680x596)
52 KB JPG
>>539815712
Based
>>
Let's focus on revoking their voting rights first.
>>
>>539815712

If you don't have a minimum of 3 children you have not bred at replacement level
>>
>>539815712
Thats not gonna work with feminist fathers
>>
File: 1756675932267829.png (243 KB, 680x510)
243 KB PNG
>>539815712
Seize the means of bio reproduction
>>
>>539815856
You won’t be able to take way just women’s rights

Which is fine I think voting at all by the general population needs to end
>>
>>539815856
how much do americans sell their kids for these days? this is probably a bot generated thread but if real just tell me how much americans sell their offspring for.
>>
>>539815979
You are gonna run into a lot of angry men if you take away their ballot box, their niggerball, and their goontube. You know the kind of people who just don't deserve to breathe, let alone reproduce
>>
>>539815856
/thread
>>
>>539816115
your nation's entire orientation is around how great democracy is. if you resist it you will get murdered. simple as.
>>
>>539815979
Do you suppose your exact ideological allies will remain in power indefinitely or how do the dismantle democracy type reason when posting this?
>>
>>539815712
then who would decide which men get the right to breed?
>>
>>539815712
Yup
>>
>>539816292
The strong chads and the rich would decide so chud incels would still be losers kek
>>
>>539815856
I agree but there is a theory that if we can make pairings happen more, get the foids and roasties on a stable relationsgip - they will start to vote same as their men
>>
>>539816115
I’m not here to be a eugenicist what the lowly people do is not really my concern

Half the population doesn’t even bother to vote


>>539816287
The kind or people who’d be in charge without democracy would be fine in my book

>>539816292
Nobody decided such things before democracy why would they after it?
>>
>>539816292
In absolute patriarchy like medieval china where not even peasant women had autonomy it was 100% based on assets and bargaining power
>>
>>539815712
Preaching to the choir
>>539815979
Exactly. Taking away women's vote is retarded it doesn't really matter to look at it like that. Only 10% of people should be allowed to vote and if some women fill the criteria then so be it.
>>
>>539816051
It would depend on the duaghter.

I would unironically sell my daughter to somebody for like 30-40k I think
>>
>>539816565
Bingo
>>
>>539816541
Petty warlords who did a palace coup?
>>
>>539816610
You mean like Ceasar? You mean like Napoleon? like Charlemagne You mean like the founding fathers or America? You mean like some of the greatest leaders of all time?

“Petty warlords” you are brain poisoned by liberal bullshit
>>
You only need to ban abortion, welfare for single mothers and birth control and the problem solves itself.
>>
>>539815712
The blonde that wears this helmet is infinitely hotter
>>
>>539815712
This picture is a disgrace. The Pickelhaube is the proud symbol of the German race. Millions of German men died wearing this hat to protect the honor of their nation.

Seeing an American whore wearing it like a Halloween costume fills me with immeasurable rage and hatred.
>>
File: 1764628275991223.png (127 KB, 600x600)
127 KB PNG
>>539815712
>Women’s only purpose
ok but that's not their only purpose tho
they are also supposed to cook me tasty meals and clean me
>>
>>539816771
Their purpose is to incubate they can do other things
>>
>>539815712
>Daily reminder that women should be property owned by her father until and if she is sold to a new owner.
based
>Women’s only purpose is to incubate children and for civilization to progress we need to get over them and and treat them for what they are
wrong, it's also to do chores and put out
>Women are literally holding back man, it’s a great filter event and we are failing.
based
>And before people call me an incel I’m married i have a daughter and I fucked plenty of girls in my younger days
incels also fuck plenty of girls, we just pay and skip the humiliation ritual. incels were never literal virgins.
>>
>>539815712
Top kek, they are. Just not for you.
>>
>>539815712
Didn’t this chinky gooker kill xherself?
>>
>>539817807
fucking imbecile always the same shit, people point out about a social problem that is objectively real and should be collectively worked on for improvement, and there's the usual "haha loser i am not affected by this"

nobody cares retard. an obedient wife who can't say no should be available for everyone.
>>
>>539815856
This.

End womens suffering by ending womens sufferage.
>>
>>539817915
I hope not. She looks gorgeous.
>>
>>539818105
based

women literally experience worse outcomes and lower quality of life the freer they are:

- women's suffrage leads to higher crime rates which they're more vulnerable to
- online dating is the best example of women having all the cards, yet women on online dating apps are always complaining and can never get a boyfriend
- in contrast to the previous point, in traditional patriarchy, women were never in a situation in which they were too old to have children and regretted not having any, which is a common problem now
- many women report being miserable having to work a full time job on top of taking care of children, but feel pressured into it by jewish media since they've been "liberated"
>>
>>539817988
why it should be available to losers? Think about the pakis in britain. Who wants it gets it. No one will help you and gives a shit about you.
>>
File: 1784104353683530.webm (2.9 MB, 540x395)
2.9 MB
2.9 MB WEBM
>>539815712
Take the real black pill. Women are already property and always have been. The issue is who owns them.
>>
>>539815712
Instead of property, try the word care. Women should be cared for, by their fathers and brothers, until they are handed over to be cared for by another man, who has been vetted. Woman should always remain in the care of men. For it is our job, as leaders, to care for women.
>>
>>539815856
Need revolution and a dictatorship for that. Only, you also gotta try and not get destroyed soon after like the last two guys.
>>
>>539818551
You're fucking retarded, but I'll bite because other people will read this other than you and may be interested in an answer.

A functional society should aim to create less losers, basically. Societies are collaborative by definition, a society with less losers is a better society, because it means life is easier, that is, collaboration between individuals is working better and more efficiently, and making life easier, thus helping people who would otherwise be losers.

Take the communism vs capitalism vs fascism debate.

The whole point of communism is to redistribute and help as many people as possible, that is fundamentally, create winners who would otherwise be losers. The main critique against it is that its inefficient the inefficiency makes everyone a loser.

Capitalism on the other hand is supposed to be efficient and make countries wealthy. In a wealthier country, the average worker can be rich, own a car, have AC at home, 24/7 electricity and running clean water, a good diet... Aka be a winner. If more people are winners who would otherwise be losers, that means society is doing something right and being good at collaborating with each other.

Fascism is similar to capitalism as in its a private property system, but fascist leaders typically tried (when it was a thing) to add rules that they think make the sytem morally and ethically better, such as protections for workers against abuse and safety nets. The point of this was to have what capitalist countries have, but make society even better by preventing as many people as possible from being losers.

One way or another, the whole point is that societies should collaborate, and the better a society's leadership and collaboation, the more people in it are winners instead of losers. "why should losers have X" is as a mindset, the complete opposite of what civilization should stand for.
>>
>>539815712
Speaking as a women, i cant agree with this since women are smarter then men, the earth has been for all of recorded history been controlled by the patriarchy and its filled to the brim with death and destruction, its in spite of that the humanity progressed not because of that.
Its time for us girlies to lead,
So shut up and follow,
Its our turn .
Whoever controls the pussy, rules the world
>>
>>539819009
you can not create less loosers. In a functional society losers should fail and winners should win, that is a condition for its development. If you cheat, make quotas for stupid people, give them welfare or women, the natural selection stops and society degrades. You simply try to cheat the laws of nature, such attempts have never worked great.
>>
File: 1765663100445838.jpg (37 KB, 600x445)
37 KB JPG
>>539819079
>Speaking as a women
Postem
>>
File: 1783959037738228.gif (416 KB, 240x240)
416 KB GIF
>>539815951
I want to reproduce with Doro!
>>
>>539819009
Good post.
>>
>>539819264
You're so fucking stupid. You got everything backwards.

Welfare isn't free, it has to be taken away from other people in order to be given. Quotas necessarily undermine the efficiency of organizations compared to hiring based on competence only. That's why those things have a cost and have downsides.

What I'm talking about is instead cooperation. Someone being competent and a positive addition to society, and being well rewarded for it, who would otherwise be a loser, for example, someone who was crippled but was healed due to medical advancements, or someone who can see because he has glasses.

I thought it would go without saying that life should be as good as possible and the better it is, the better a society is doing. You're fucking retarded with those natural selection fantasies, and your views on quotas and welfare are completely backwards, you seem to think that there's a "make everyone rich quick" switch, which there's not, but that it still shouldn't be pressed due to "natural selection", both your premise and your conclusion from it are retarded.
>>
>>539819451
thanks fren
>>
>>539815712
Why don't women wear military helmets anymore?
>>
no body owns anyone faggot
>>
File: would.jpg (45 KB, 680x491)
45 KB JPG
>>539815712
Anyone know that chick's back story?
>>
>>539816565
>if some women fill the criteria
Name a woman who would, as an example please
>>
>>539815712
I'd rather enslave the hosts and audience of Whatever desu
>>
>>539815712
you cant make them bear children they dont want. this doesnt do any good. you have to think about what youre advocating here.

what kind of quality of people will this summon. the people we have now. the gene pool is still from patriarchy times. dont be stupid.

off course some women are retarded and do random stupid things but alot of them are smarter than you guys.
>>
sounds like you just can't afford them OP
>>
your patriarchy was a giant piece of shit off course and going the exacty opposite route, ignoring nuance, will also be a giant fail off course.

people cant do it right as a whole, you have to do it right on your own. try it, or not. its your choice.

a guy like me can pick between hundreds of women, but i dont want most of them. i create a problem too. i was supposed to just randomly impregnate everyone but i am so picky. sometimes i go 10 years and tell all of them no.
>>
File: Doro-Nikke-3.jpg (404 KB, 1536x860)
404 KB JPG
>>539819419
>>539815951
>>
>>539816565
taking away women's vote is precisely one of the key fixes.

there are more voting women in the US than men. if they voted as a unified bloc they could win every time. do you somehow think that's a good thing?

then you get into the concept of a household. a single household should have one vote and that's the vote of the man. now you have not only women voting (for the current thing) but a conflict of the woman pressuring her husband how to vote through withholding sex/affection. a lot of men vote the same as their wives because they are cucks or to keep the peace. some lie and tell their wife what they want to hear but the point remains, what the fuck are we doing here?

modern women use sex as a way to gatekeep opinions. basically if you don't agree with them on BLM, immigration, etc then they won't date/sleep with you. men cave to get pussy, story as old as time.

not only do they gatekeep in relationships, but now every HR karen also controls employment. whether you get the job or keep your job is up to the same people, and with social media and echo chambers they gas each other up.

it all starts with women's suffrage and it needs to go.
>>
>>539815803
The behavior of Indian men can be explained by one cultural aspect found throughout the Indian subcontinent: arranged marriage.

The area has had arranged marriage for around 2,000 years. It persists today, with over 90% of marriages in India being arranged (and nearly all of the rest have strong familial support).

There’s no mechanism for dating in India, and there hasn’t been for that same period of time. Why would there be when nearly everyone is engaged and doesn’t choose their spouse? And because this has been a part of their society for so long, there isn’t even a concept of “courtship.” They simply don’t know what it is.

As such, adolescents don’t intermingle. While young people in every other part of the world are growing up, they learn how to interact with the opposite sex. Indians never learn this. Outside of being “creepy” in the modern sense (short, brown, frail, and nerdy), they’re creepy in the classical sense.

It’s why the Bobs and Vagene meme exists. It’s why so many of them masturbate in public. It’s why they stand around staring at women on the beach. It’s why they make those regarded slowmo pensive videos before being killed by trains.

The only way to break from this cycle is to integrate and end arranged marriage, which they simply won’t do. Indians are very insular and have no plans on integrating with an alien culture.

tl;dr arranged marriage has made being bad with girls a part of Indian culture.

>but EuRoPeAnS dId iT tOo!
No.

European peasants (90% of the population) never had formalized, de jure arranged marriage. Girls were encouraged to pick a boy and marry him, and the family had to give consent. That system isn’t the same as two families meeting when their children are prepubescents, deciding on a date, and signing a contract.

Boys still had to figure out how to “win” a girl they actually wanted. Marriage to a particular girl wasn’t guaranteed, so they had learn the game.
>>
>>539821063
its not about literally beating all women into submission.

i agree that they can't be enslaved. for two reasons, first because women may be less intelligent than men statistically, i dont even know if they are, but if anything there's not a big difference like with europeans vs blacks, that's for sure

also because there's women in all families, poor families and rich families, so women can't be an underclass as a whole.

what women should do however is have different values, be trad, serve men and be subservient to men, and teach that from mother to daughter throughout generations.
>>
its all mirroring, your solipsism will be found in all the people aswell. this is what you did. we can never do it right.
>>
>>539815951

moar lil pink
>>
>>539816573
Sold, I need someone to clean my house.
>>
>>539821459
this can not work, they can only submit to a guy thats a good leader and this is what most men are not.
this is part of the problem that so many men are weak and useless.
>>
>>539815712
Are you saying that mudslimes do it right?
>>
>>539815712
So why aren't sunni muslims dominating the galaxy yet?
>>
>>539818720
I do this all the time to women when I'm out with my boys. I'll just point at a bitch and say there's something wrong with her face or body. You wanna see a real trail of tears? Follow me around Walmart for 30 minutes.
>>
>>539818748
The historical term is chattle.
>>
>>539821063
>you cant make them bear children they dont want
Uhhh yes I can.
>>
>>539818720
Solid point
>>
>>539815712
I think men got rid of that system because they also hated it. Women are crazy and dealing with them is not something anyone wants to do.
>>
>>539818551
>>539817807
>>539818551
>>539819264
Nigger what does this have to do with “losers” ? What are you talking about?

Stop projecting and show flag
>>
>>539818720
could be me ;d
>>
>>539815712
I disagree. That is not the kind of society I want to live in. I take the third position. Arranged marriages from young childhood, the couple are raised together, such that when they are married they have already lived together for their entire life.
>>
>>539815856
>>539816525
This isn’t a theory. Married women are much more likely to follow the voting choice of their husbands.

Voting has been expanded to nearly everyone. Only prisoners and children are excluded. It’s a little ridiculous. It should have always been white men of good character. Better yet, “white men whobare the head of their household.” Sorry NEETs (you wouldn’t be NEETs if that system uad been in place for decades). It was only expanded to take advantage of the stupidity of the masses, it because of a moral imperative.

We can’t go back to that without violence, because the people in charge, who are objectively of bad moral character, would be the ones defining “good character.”

A better first move would be to expand representation rather than to contract the number of voters. By eliminating single winner elections in favor of multiple winners, we end the two-party stranglehold (see: Duverger’s Law). The workings of this aren’t complicated.

This naturally expands the public discourse beyond what we currently have, so long as free speech remains and parties atent banned outright (see: Europe, lol).
>>
>>539821610
Universal suffrage developed from the obvious contradiction that an indolent drunkard man does not deserve to vote over a respectable housewife by virtue of having a cock.

Universal male suffrage was an anomaly that only lasted for a few decades in the 19th century. If you'll let the most retarded and unproductive man vote, why should his opinion count more than an aristocratic woman's. It shouldn't, so universal suffrage was inevitable.
>>
>>539821610
cope, you're literally blaming men for what feminism and jewish media did
>>
>>539815712
>And before people call me an incel I’m married i have a daughter and I fucked plenty of girls in my younger days
I hope your very real wife, daughter and all those girls you definitely fucked reads this bro.
>>
>>539821896
this is going to yield another retard like you. waste of time. the woman must be motivated.
>>
>>539821937
You're a dumb kike stfu
>>
>>539821987
Oh wow the jeet wants arranged marriages, color me fucking shocked
>>
>>539815712
I concur. Also married with daughters.
>>
File: 1785336396731652.jpg (217 KB, 797x824)
217 KB JPG
>>539822418
>the woman must be motivated.
You're a fucking retard holy shit.
>>
>>539822055
China was right about social credit scores and you all know it.
>>
>>539815712
RIP
>>
>>539821258
Calm down elon
>>
File: 1779006052246253.jpg (127 KB, 860x852)
127 KB JPG
>>539822585
she is going to raise the child and not you. you will be working and only have "fun" with the child and the woman will raise it, as usual.

it says alot about you when you want to live with a woman thats not motivated but enslaved. youre useless. the only woman for you is a slave and you wont get a slave, retard.
>>
women would be the most annoying property
>>
>>539822642
No actually its causing millions of people in China to die homeless, you not caring about that doesn't make it not a problem, it just means your brain is defective
>>
>>539815712
test
>>
>>539822749
shut up foid

yes women can get raped, get pregnant, and have children that way, and that would improve birth rates
>>
>>539822864
Holy shit, you think the social credit score stuff you read on Facebook is real. It only sounds plausible to you because you live under a dictatorship. The idea of banning people from society is a Jewish concept. China doesn’t practice this on individuals (they most certainly do this stuff to corporations though, which is a good thing), but the U.S. government desperately wants to. And you know they want to. You fear it could become a reality, because it very well may come to pass.
>>
>>539820876
>chick's back story?
a streched anus?
four digits cockleage?
just another whore...yandex it
>>
>>539823135
>Holy shit, you think the social credit score stuff you read on Facebook is real
Yeah, and I also assume you're a liar straight off the bat when you post pro China shit. So you are definitely lying about it not being real too. Didn't read the rest, you're a vapid political whore.
>>
File: 1784540054985002m.jpg (84 KB, 1024x752)
84 KB JPG
>>539815712
>Daily reminder that women should be property owned by her father until and if she is sold to a new owner.
>Women’s only purpose is to incubate children and for civilization to progress we need to get over them and and treat them for what they are
yes.
but unironically
>>
File: 1753904208921316.jpg (381 KB, 650x812)
381 KB JPG
>>539822749
>enslaved
You have never known satisfaction and never will until you submit to a man and produce his children, just like a man will never know satisfaction until they take responsibility for a household.
All the SSRI inhibitors in the world will never substitute for the hormone cocktail that is a baby.
>>
>>539815712
>who dat?
Whatever helmet girl's name is Madysen Vue
>>
>>539815856
Nobody should be able to vote. Liberalism destroyed a global empire at least 5 times in the last century alone.
>>
File: image-8-3336466823.jpg (178 KB, 1213x832)
178 KB JPG
>>539822749
Only women could be handed a paradise built for their pleasure on the blood and sweat of their husbands and fathers, where they never have to work, never have to fight, and spend all day parading around their fancy hats to their church friends and baking brownies, and call it enslavement. The Bible was right, women really do have an instinctive desire to destroy paradise.
>>
File: Capture.png (1.38 MB, 1248x846)
1.38 MB PNG
>>539826253
>Madysen Vue
Wood confirmed
>>
>>539815712
How much for your daughter anon?
>>
>>539816573
Let us know how to get in touch with you to negotiate.
>>
File: age of waifubot.png (210 KB, 1230x690)
210 KB PNG
>>539815712
>>539815856
You'll never take women's rights away. At best all you can do is replace them with sexbots that you can actually own.
>>
>>539822815
Women are property, and they're annoying. That's reality.
>>
>>539822015
>Married women are much more likely to follow the voting choice of their husbands.
Lol. This motherfucker thinks voting matters.

In the mind of a burger, they vote for an autocrat every 4 years while calling it democracy and freedom. Right now Team Blue is angry at Team Red, because Team Blue wanted someone browner to destroy the country faster.
>>
>>539823503
What's the box on its collar for?
>>
>>539815712
>I fucked plenty of girls in my younger days
Well excuse me, Unc "Pussy Magnet" McUncle, you surely know best. Please, tell us how it is to be a blue collar cunt and to have deep thoughts like these.
>>
>>539826882
usually about an acre and a few cows. depends if she's cute and can already cook tho
>>
>>539820876
Random cali girl who got picked up by dating pod, started working there as a frozen mascot. Just sit there and look cute. Don't say a word. Left a year or so ago
>>
>>539828415
Exactly that's why you have to negotiate. Even Muslims get to peek behind the veil before making an offer.
>>
>>539823336
Polish anon is correct
>>
>>539819009
Great idea - let's create less people so there's less competition and struggle
>>
>>539828845
The Black Plague was absolutely fantastic for the labor market
>>
>>539828527
Thanks anon. The frozen mascot thing worked for her. Other women should take note.
>>
>>539828966
It can be endearing if they don't have much of a personality, but eventually they get bored. Not even praise and popsicles is enough
>>
They already are. They go to the highest bidder.
>>
>>539829343
>Not even praise and popsicles is enough
Kek
>>
>>539828096
battery
>>
File: IMG_3921.jpg (129 KB, 1282x559)
129 KB JPG
>>539816712
Your country has been conquered by 70 IQ nigs. Belgians are the biggest cucks on the planet.
>>
>>539817915
different asian chick, but this one was kicked off/left because she refused to answer personal questions.
>>
File: FUURA-BUNKA.jpg (125 KB, 813x571)
125 KB JPG
>>539833466
damn I misquoted my post
>This picture is a disgrace. The Pickelhaube is the proud symbol of the German race. Millions of German men died wearing this hat to protect the honor of their nation.
and a lot of belgians died by "men" wearing this hat, cuck
>>
>>539816573
i would probably sell mine (if i ever had one) to a needy simp for 100k. desu thats a great return on investment if you sell them young
>>
File: 1772439863271018.jpg (2.13 MB, 3426x2226)
2.13 MB JPG
>>539833572
Whatcha doin' rabbi?
>>
>>539815712
Women ARE property. It's just that most people don't realize that.
>>
>>539815712
Women are like water. Without a man, they are chaos. They cannot hold themselves together, and they flow wherever emotions lead them. Men are containers. We are sturdy and designed to contain the female chaos. We set boundaries. Women need this so more than they know or would admit. And this is why, all throughout human history, a woman has always been kept by a man, first the father, then husband.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.