This is illegal, right?
No
>>539827152well yeah because he's at a hearing not a trial in a criminal court.
>>539827152It’s legal if he’s jewish
>>539827152Only if you’re fucking idiot and don’t know the constitution. >>539827203
You're not allowed to just never answer anything, otherwise what would be the point of asking?Fuck it, forget the law and just blackbag his ass to GITMO.>inb4 "noooo that's illegal!"Don't care, rule of law is fake and gay
>>539827152He didn't receive a pardon for future charfes of perjury. But surely all of the existing evidence is enough to charge him, right? Right?
>>539827203>>539827255he isn't in a criminal trial
>>539827152Its complicated. Its WAR.He an AGENT of ZOG / Niggers&Jews.You look like you need another Boat-Load-O-Niggers.
>>539827333Well his pardon is invalid because a white house staffer signed it with auto pen. And yes he's made enough statements to be prosecuted if Trump decides to officially invalidate it. This dude killed 2 million people anon.
>>539827345And?
>>539827152Why would it be illegal? That's the purpose of the 5th amendment. >>539827250It doesn't have to be at trial, it just has to be anything that could be theoretically used in a criminal trial. It's the same reasoning as why you don't have to talk to the cops if you've been arrested, even if you haven't been charged with anything.
>>539827506and the 5th only applies to criminal trials
>>539827152it's funny because he's supposed to be the most prolific and consummate of professionals in virology. imagine being at the center of a worldwide cataclysm and being in the spotlight, center fucking stage and then acting like a retard pretending you dont know anything? interesting how subject matter experts suddenly become smoothbrains when the law gets involved. if i were him i would embrace the suck, spit straight facts, dazzle the world with my depth of knowledge, skill, and technical expertise despite the consequences. it's not like this guy NEEDS to be free, is he conducting cutting edge state of the art experiments in a lab in his basement or some shit? if we were to imprison him would we lose access to all the decades of research he has? jfc.he wants the acclaim without any of the work.
Vote Rope!
>>539827606Wrong
>>539827152Do something about it, Timmy.Thought not.
>>539827152Whoever thought 5th amendment is good is a retard
>>539827606Criminal case, not trial. The text specifices case. A hearing can give the DOJ the ammo needed to make a criminal case and take him to trial and would be included in this.
>>539827152Surely republicans will only be able to use his testimony to prosecute him for perjury if he actually lied? so isn't this an admission that he did? if you only tell the truth you can't possibly be guilty of perjury?
>>539827152All that matters is what normies are willing to do and most of them were willing to take the jab. The normie mind will justify their decision no matter what.
>>5398278045th amendment is stupid because you can say "I dont remember" to any question asked and its the same damn thing.>But what if they remember after the trial! They lied! Prejury!People remembering different things at different times is natural. A hearing is a high stress situation, its not uncommon for people to forget things when put on the spot.
>>539827630>it's funny because he's supposed to be the most prolific and consummate of professionals in virology. imagine being at the center of a worldwide cataclysm and being in the spotlight, center fucking stage and then acting like a retard pretending you dont know anything?The optics of this are so bad for the left that it may even get liberal NPCs to question things.
>>539827152It is since he's been pardoned of all crimes by Biden. He theoretically has no way to implicate himself of any crimes due to that. So, yes, it is illegal for him to plead the fifth.
>>539827250>well yeah because he's at a hearing not a trial in a criminal court.I love it when some anonymous idiot on 4chan thinks he knows more than the high-powered attorneys on either side.You go, Girl!
>>539827528he cant incriminate himself for things he's been pardoned for, niggerthat's why the 5th doesnt apply herereminder they knew the answers to every single question they asked him
>>539828179This.
>>539827839he's already pardonedso unless he lies, they cant charge himbut fact of the matter is he was protecting others and globohomo would kill him if he opened his mouthso you can expect after congress finds him in contempt and jails him, he's magically going to Epstein himself while the cameras are shut off
>>539828320Just desserts for a globohomo stooge.
>>539827997The Republicans were throwing contradictory quotes around in the hearing. >You said remdesivir was great but here's your own people's documents saying it was shit >You said at a meeting in January 2020 that covid came from a lab but later swore up and down that was a conspiracy>You illegally enriched yourself and used federal employees to apply for cash prizes>You told people masks were useless, then forced the people to wear themBasically, they already had the testimony from the retard's diary, they just wanted him to squirm and he's at least copping a contempt charge for today. Hopefully the DOJ wipes its ass with the pardon and sends him to a numbers-only prison.
>>539827469Closer to 60 million
>>539828570Half with the airborne bio-weapon...
>>539828609... and half with the injectable iteration.
>>539828185>Using the appeal to authority fallacy in a discussion about a guy who repeatedly fallaciously appealed to his authority over covidLefties aren't sending their best... or maybe they are, jeez.
>>539828185He crossed state lines. Checkmate.
>>539827152>This is illegal, right?Everything Fauci did? Yes.
>>539827152in response to your question, On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
>>539827152Kek, Danish government has settled reperations for covid vax with a bunch of people already, since it had been called safe and effective, and in fact wasnt. Either
>>539828008absolute bonkers
>>539827152Wasn't he pardoned by Biden?How can anything he say be self-incriminating?
>>539827630No one in their retirement community angrily watching this on Fox News cares for the facts, no one grilling him in that room cares for the facts
Here’s the full text of the amendment:“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”All this said, yes you can be forced to testify by a grand jury and yes if you refuse to testify you can be IMMEDIATELY jailed. His defense is in actuality what people mean by “taking the 5th.” It is not ACTUALLY about avoiding self-incrimination, but rather a provision that forces the state to prove you are guilty rather than you testify to prove your innocence.
>>539829814>except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger;this is code for >a military tribunal is not going to care about this
>>539827152yes, funnily enough5th amendment only applies to criminal investigations, and Fauci has been pre-emptively pardoned by Biden for the entire time period, so he can't face criminal charges no matter how he testifiesin order to avoid implicating himself in the crimes he committed but has been pardoned for, he ended up committing perjury after his pardon period was overoopsie
>>539830863
>>539828513It was pretty much the republican being low iq and being unable to understand those "contradictions", nothing will happen. Remember how Clinton was going to be locked up? Remember muh Somalians scam? Lmao
>>539830863there are a couple reasons he pled the fif:1- he already lied to congress numerous times, to answer any of those questions honestly would incriminate him for lying to congress2- answering honestly to any of those questions will get him killed by glowniggers faster than you can say rumplestiltskin
>>539832848>Remember muh Somalians scamI remember a bunch of Somalis have been charged and deported over it, yeah. At least something happened, not nearly enough but it's a start. There shouldn't be Somalis in USA in the first place, fuck off lightbulbhead.
>>539832939"your honor if I answer your questions honestly I will be killed by glowniggers faster than you can say rumplestiltskin and in order to testify before congress and not plead the fifth I need a 24/7 guard of veteran united states marines">"okay weird lol, we'll give you that guard now and see if what you say justifies that and if it doesn't then you just lied before congress so no biggie for us to assume you're telling the truth about needing protection."It really is that easy. US government is retarded, everyone is retarded.
>>539827152I hate this motherfucker more than you can ever imagine.He caused my family a lot of pain. I'm hoping he was asked questions like what color is your tie or what color is the carpet so that when he pled the fifth they could later hold him and contempt.Trump needs to revoke his Auto pin blanket pardon and let the people beat him to fucking death
>>539830863There is also the issue of whether BIden's autopen pardons can be undone. That old fuck's reach is even from beyond his political grave
>>539833951> he causedforced at gunpoint even> Trump needs toget his 3rd termWWGWl1WGA
>>539833951This whole COVID thing was not about a pandemic. It was the largest psyop in human history. A test to see how many people they could brainwash, and most of the people failed.
>>539830863so youre telling me there is old offenses
>>539833139if congress puts him in prison, Fauci will be Epstein'd
>>539834609yes, Fauci lied to Congress after his pardonits a lot of the same shit they asked him todayexcept today they had the paperwork that proves he was lying
>>539827255You can't plead the 5th if you have a presidential pardon because there is no incriminating thing you can say anymore.
>>539834851he was pleading the 5th so as not to incriminate himself for lying to Congress last couple times he was in there, which was after the pardon's scope expired
I don't like Fauci, but he's doing the right thing here.Senate hearings like this, where anyone is going to be adversarial at all, are pretty much always retardedHe shouldn't even be legally required to attend that grandstanding circlejerk
>>539827152
>>539834991go back to plebbit with your retard shit, it sticks out too much here
>>539834687I would accept executing every single person fauci has ever known and letting him walk free.
>>539827152yes, immunity came with conditions that he must disclose everything. if he doesn't hold his end of the bargain then immunity doesn't apply. but we all know this type of bullshit only applies to normiefags and gov't faggots are immune to all prosecution
>>539827630People will forget about this, it will be just like Zuckerberg on at congress for peddling CSAM to known pedos with a non figurative disclosure and warning label. What ever crime he committed will be lawyered up so hard that doing anything about it short of writing new laws won't matter
>>539827152The Fifth Amendment is not illegal, nor is it SUPPOSED to be used as a reason to attempt to prosecute someone. In practice, though, it's a big red flag and our corrupt judicial system will go after you if you invoke it.
>>539827152We all know it came from china!
>>539835031moron
>>539833006>a bunch of Somalis have been chargedBy democrats, trump and his dicksuckers added nothing to that
>>539827152Who cares.Everyone who has paid attention for the last 2 years knows that we won't be getting satisfaction.The damage of the Plandemic to society, the economy and individuals across the world is done now.The only way we're getting real justice is if someone assassinates this guy before he runs off to some isolated McMansion somewhere in the hills surrounded by a PMC for the rest of his life.There is no punishment they can give him that would be adequate that does not involve the end of his life.
>>539827203have you read the 5th amendment? Is there some sort of exception in it referring to public danger?
>>539834248That'd be an uphill battle. For one, unlike other things like a bill there's nothing in the constitution or law requiring a signature for a pardon to go into effect. It's just a power the President has. Keep in mind Trump argues that a President doesn't even have to write down or speak an order for it to count. If Trump can declassify documents just by thinking it, then Biden publicly saying he's pardoned Faucis is basically ironclad.There's also the fact that both parties have been using auto pens for decades and Trump himself uses them - including possibly on pardons.
>>539827152Why would it be illegal? Rand Paul literally said his goal was to get Fauci to lie so they could throw him in jail. No speak = no lie. Give those ghouls no opportunity to twist your words in bad faith. Even if you don't like the guy you have to admit it's genius.
>>539835522Laws are fake during covid they took away the first amendment
>>539827280I'm glad you don't care because that's never happening anyway lol Trump is a pussy
>>539827152He is science. You will not question science, heretic.
>>539828179He can still be thrown in jail for commiting perjury AFTER the pardon was issued. Pardon only pardons all supposed crimes before said pardon
>>539836316He blinded me with science
Nobody has ever died of covid in the UK. Not one single person, ever. That’s the ‘good’ news but it’s also the awful news. We already know that the UK government were having weekly booze parties on Downing Street during the covid hoax floyting all their own restrictions and verbally mocking them and the public. Politicians made SIX BILLION POUNDS vanish untraced into thin air through “covid contacts” which they were handing out to their own families and business partners. They unpoliced politician and media establishment cartel will allow no inquiry into the missing billions, stating as their reason>the emergency was so serious. …even after being caught for their parties. Puc: they lied about absolutely EVERYTHING every day but we won in the end and they couldn’t inject anyone. Even in hospitals staff refused to wear masks while continuous loop recordings were playing on the Tannoy systems ordering mask use. It was worse than anything the nazis ever did, more people have been murdered. At a minimum the injections raised the death rate by 20%. Politicians and the media that you are crack-addicted to. And they ended the covid hoax saying>and would you believe it - the bloody space aliens have arrived now in their spaceshipsIf you remember.
>>539827152He was pardoned. Therefore he has no fifth amendment rights. If he were incriminated for perjury it wouldn't have meant a penalty. But committing contempt of congress by refusing to answer questions should get him locked up
>>539827152Trump does it every time he’s under deposition along with his ding-a-ling sons.
>>539827203
>>539836802> It was worse than anything the nazis ever diddelightful and freshyou're not British, mate
>>539835522Here's what AI says: Josh Hawley told Fauci he had no 5th amendment rights because of his pardon and asked him questions before congress. Am I correct that the only way that would be incorrect is if Fauci believed answering could incriminate him for crimes not covered by his pardon? Some of the questions were innocuous such as 'What color tie am I wearing?' . Did Fauci commit contempt of congress by pleading the 5th to every question Hawley asked?3. Current StatusFollowing the hearing on July 29, 2026, Rand Paul announced that the committee would vote to certify Fauci for contempt of Congress. While Fauci’s attorneys likely advised the blanket plea to avoid accidentally slipping up on a nuanced question that could implicate an unpardoned issue (like a potential state crime), legal experts agree that refusing to answer obvious, non-incriminating questions provides strong grounds for a contempt citation.
>>539837811Oops didn't copy parts1 and 2 here they are1. The Scope of the Fifth Amendment After a PardonYour assessment is legally sound: because Anthony Fauci holds a full pardon for federal offenses committed between 2014 and 2025, he cannot validly invoke the Fifth Amendment to refuse answering questions about those specific past events. The pardon eliminates the risk of self-incrimination for those acts. The only valid reasons he could still plead the Fifth would be:Fear of State Prosecution: The presidential pardon covers only federal crimes. If his testimony could expose him to state criminal charges (e.g., under Maryland or Virginia law), he retains the right to remain silent. Fear of Unpardoned Federal Crimes: If the questions touched on conduct outside the Jan 1, 2014 – Jan 20, 2025 window, or crimes not covered by the specific language of the pardon (though the pardon was "full and unconditional" for his service). 2. Did He Commit Contempt by Pleading the Fifth to Innocuous Questions?Yes, legally speaking, his blanket refusal likely constitutes contempt of Congress. No Privilege for Innocuous Facts: Questions like "What day is it?" or "What color is your tie?" carry zero risk of self-incrimination for any crime, pardoned or otherwise. There is no conceivable legal basis to invoke the Fifth Amendment for these queries.The "Blanket" Refusal: By invoking the Fifth Amendment for every question—including those completely unrelated to criminal liability—Fauci failed to make a good-faith claim of privilege. Courts have consistently ruled that a witness cannot issue a blanket refusal; they must assert the privilege question-by-question based on a specific fear of incrimination. Senator Hawley's Argument: Josh Hawley correctly cited Brown v. Walker (1896), establishing that a pardoned witness "may not stand upon his privilege." Since Fauci cannot be prosecuted for the past federal acts, he has no ground to refuse testimony about them.
>>539827839>A hearing can give the DOJ the ammo needed to make a criminal case and take him to trial and would be included in this.Literally any statement you make at any point in time ever could be used in a criminal case.
>>539827152Even if a person isn't backed by the 5th amendment they can still have valid reasons not to implicate themself to protect themself or family from vigilante justice.Presidential pardons also don't hold up against ICC.
>>539837095What crime was he pardoned for?
>>539827152No it’s based. Fauci keeps dabbing on seething retards.
>>539840577Not the statements made between you and your lawyer
>>539827152turdies really be like>why don't you want universal healthcare?sweaty, do you not understand who we'd be giving even more control over us?
>>539840879You get what I mean you minty fresh cunt.
>>539827152>This is illegal, right?Pedophilia is legal I the US. Killing kids is. (the chief is,) so I dont think whatever you post is illegal. You literally have a man who commited every mayor crime. I dont think your question is your worst problem.
>so what were your job functions in public office?>I plead the 5thmakes sense, clearly a reasonable way to run government.
>>539827152uhh what's he so afraid of?
>>539833139Anon, imagine a RICO trial with mob members where they felt intimidated at the thought of being assassinated for testifying. Now imagine the one asking him questions and trying to get him to fess up works for the boss they’re asking him to rat on. That is what is happening here. You will not receive justice from this organization, until there is a jubilee replacing all government members with fresh faces all of this is a complete fucking sham used to control public perception. That’s all.
>>539827152No, but via logical deduction it is admission of a crime.
Hey don't be angry goy some of the smart people made a lot of money during the pandemic.
>>539835522well, the military wont care about it in a tribunal, for example
>>539827152Who fucking cares
>>539837095>f he were incriminated for perjury it wouldn't have meant a penaltysure he could have beenfor exampleFauci already lied to congress after the term of the pardontelling them the truth this morning would have given them reason to throw him in jail for lying back theninstead, they will throw him in jail for contempt of congresswhere a hit man will take him out and we'll get told he had a sudden bout of suicidebecause glowniggers are going to have too much else to try and protect in this
>>539840717all the crimes
>>539827469Trump uses the autopen too you faggot.
>>539841402getting put in jail and Epstein'd
>>539845148FUCK YOU MAXXTARD
>>539845293yeah but its not being used after he's dead and they're literally CGI'ing him in press interviews
>>539827152noyou don't ever have to talk to government officialsit's strictly voluntaryyou do have to be explicit that you're invoking your 5th amendment right, thoughsome corrupt judges have ruled that just silence can imply guilt (complete bullshit, but still the law)
>>539827152laws for goyim. jews and their chosen shabbos have immunity from laws
>>539827152This is settled case law under Brown v Walker in 1896.https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/do-presidential-pardons-remove-the-fifth-amendment-rights-of-recipients>This precedent dates back to 1896 and the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Walker. In his majority opinion, Justice Henry Billings Brown found that if a “witness has already received a pardon, he cannot longer set up his [Fifth Amendment] privilege, since he stands, with respect to such offense, as if it had never been committed.” Brown cited cases dating back to English law and the Aaron Burr treason trial as supporting that conclusion.>A second Court decision, Burdick v. United States (1915), added another dimension to the question. George Burdick, a newspaper editor, published an article alleging misconduct at a customs house. Burdick asserted this Fifth Amendment rights in front of a grand jury, which was investigating a leak of information from the Treasury Department to the newspaper.>President Woodrow Wilson granted a full pardon to Burdick, even though Burdick was not charged with a crime. Wilson’s pardon may have been in an effort to compel Burdick to testify since Burdick could not “take the Fifth” if he received a pardon under the Brown precedent. Instead, Burdick refused to accept Wilson’s pardon, and then he was held in contempt when questioned again by Congress and cited the Fifth Amendment.>Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Joseph McKenna said that “a witness may refuse to testify on the ground that his testimony may have an incriminating effect, notwithstanding the President offers, and he refuses, a pardon for any offense connected with the matters in regard to which he is asked to testify.” McKenna cited a precedent from United States v. Wilson (1833), when Chief Justice John Marshall found such a pardon may be “rejected by the person to whom it is tendered; and if it be rejected, we have discovered no power in a court to force it on him.”
