if morality is subjective why is it subjective to perspective.
fucki meant if morality is objective then why is it objective to perspective
>>539859459its not objective, it cant be its always case by case
>>539859459Just a prank bro.
>>539859419>>539859459nigger nigger is nigger, then nigger nigger nigger nigger
>>539859459HAHAHAHAHA GET A LOAD OF THIS FUCKING RETARD AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>539859459Morality is a statistical mapping from an individual human knowledge state to the best behavioral strategy as it relates to the objective world (which is outside of our direct experience).
>>539859419A subject is an object that perceives an object consciously. A thing is subjective when perceived by a subject, and objectively perceived when imperially measured. What people mean when they say "subjective" is most often "relative." But all perception is relative to the point or angle of perception of the subject or the mental clarity of the subject. A thing that is subjectively perceived from one relative point and mental state does not mean there is no objectivity. Further, there are partial truths, and many relative-subject perceptions can be stitched together to create a proper account of objective truth. For example, a detective collecting many sides to a story/crime in order to find a solution/suspect. Further, absolute truth necessitates itself because if it is true that truth is not absolutely true, then the statement itself "there is no absolute truth" is an absolute truth statement. TL;DR Subjectivity and objectivity are different. People confuse subjectivity and relativity. Truth is absolute. Further, only braindead boomers high on acid and sophistic niggas from ancient history have argued otherwise
>>539859997but dude, what if your purple is my yellow?
>>539859419>>539859459If OP is fag, then why is it fag to OP?
>>539861068
