>our biggest trade partner is China>they're also our supposed enemyExplain how this makes any sense
>>539886361If our government truly considered China the enemy we wouldn't have just let in an additional 500,000 Chinese "students" (spies) and sold off more American farmland to the CCP.https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/maga-fumes-trump-argues-500-164113161.html
>>539886361Our biggest trading partners are Mexico then Canada, also our enemies apparently.
>>539886361It’s the conjoined twin theory at play here. One twin has the heart that supplies blood to both of their bodies and the other has the liver. Separating them would be the mutual death of both.
>>539886521>If our government truly considered China the enemy we wouldn't have just let in an additional 500,000 Chinese "students" (spies) and sold off more American farmland to the CCP.Your government does what jews tell them to do, and jews want you to lose the war with china.
China is the only country white and unjewed enough to engage in mass industry and high technology.
>>539886361for the belief that trading with your enemy would prevent any conflicts breaking up with themziggers proved that belief false
>>539886361What we are seeing is a repeat of the fall of the Spanish Empire. Spain became incredibly wealthy with gold mined in latin America, and used this gold to buy goods from other European states, primarily Britain and the Netherlands. This strong demand turbocharged British industry which lead to Britain eclipsing Spain and transforming from a sweat shop into a gigantic empire in it's own right.America is in the same relationship with China. Of course, American industrialist oligarchs wanted to retain their industries which is why they had quite high tariffs historically, but they were defeated by the finance oligarchs, which took the shape of the Regan revolution. Regans reforms drastically accelerated the historical process of America declining and generating it's own usurper, but in the meantime finance oligarchs have made an absolute killing.
>>539888376Ronald Reagan was a hollywood movie star, its all theatre
>>539888542Yeah of course, I'm not saying Regan was a mastermind. He was merely the meat puppet for the plebs. It's not like he actually came up with a single one of his policies, they were all crafted for him by big money.
>>539887732The interdependence between Russia and Western Europe dissuaded war and resulted in the Minsk Agreements back in 2014-2015. Merkel (Germany and France were involved in the agreements) straight up admitted that this was just used to trick Russians and prepare Ukraine for war.What you're saying is not wrong but it's belligerent cocksuckers like you who were the actual problem.
>>539888998I love it when people verbatim repeat things they watched on YouTube.
>>539888376I think that the finance oligarchs always win in a democracy because they basically promise infinite money to plebs and plebs vote for them every time. For a long term plan, you need to let the people starve and reward financial responsibility.
>>539886361you won't notice how badly our politicians are failing us compared to china if you look down on them. you will instead accept your worsening conditions and exploitation as a sign of superiority.that's literally it. that's the game they're playing.
I think America wants to lose at some point so they can shovel their debt onto the winning countryOur nation doesn't apply itself.
>>539889957We don't really live in democracy, it's oligarchy with the trappings of democracy in order to legitimize the regime. It's nothing about offering the plebs money, because all policy decisions are out of the hands of plebs. Regan wasn't even promising gibs.When a crisis arises there is typically the status quo party, and the party offering some kind of solution. The crisis is often manufactured behind the scenes by a rising faction of oligarchs, who then present the party offering a solution, with it's entire program created by them. The plebs have zero decision making power over the program, and just get to pick between the buffet of shit being offered by the rival factions.
>>539886361Because Nixon and Reagan built China to be Anerica’s slave race of factory churning yellow mongrels and the millisecond the CPC opposed global banking kikes and actually cared about their people they became our biggest enemy and must be destroyed. See picrel
>>539886361They're not your enemy. Some of the intelligence agency people just consider china the number 1 adversary. I don't see it. The chinese are too passive and not creative enough to run a global empire.
>>539887732china was built up as a friend, as a geopolitical strategy. same story with the asian tigers, it just happened later under a different administration.what you're talking about is the broader geopolitical strategy behind globalism, and you still got that wrong. it's not about stopping all conflict, it's about reducing the number of conflicts and putting a cap on how destructive they end up being. and yes, it clearly worked. it's also clearly on its way out, brexit was the beginning of the end. there will be adjustment pains, because our cost of living floor was artificially dropped and the population exploded to an absurd degree. this means we are all much, much poorer relatively speaking. this has been mostly swept under the rug thanks to international cost of living disparities creating a "cheap foreign labor pool", as well as the general overproduction of global industrial systems. as those things become less and less available, you'll see how poor we really are. we fucked ourselves, and very few people are even aware of the fact.on the brightside, you'll probably live to see third world shitholes completely collapse. their populations are entirely propped up by the globalist system. on the downside, it's highly unlikely the massive wave of refugees will get turned around at the border.
>>539890556Well, what got me thinking down those lines is how did your country collapse?To me when you have a democracy, there is such an incentive for welfare, cheap foreign imports, debt... It will always beat the financial-responsibility, home industrialist crowds.. the politicians of austerity get thrown out on their ass. To me that is why China, though no less oligarchical than us, has maintained a strong industry.. it is not a popular policy, but it is a wise one.
>>539886361It is a form of mutually assured destruction via economics, demolition charges if you will. If we are isolated and self-reliant, we are too strong for globohomo. But when coupled with other countries, we all crash together when they rug pull. It does NOT make sense for anyone who doesn't want destruction.
>>539891113Democracy is not the cause of the problem though. These processes are driven by oligarchs simply seeking their own short term self interest. They own the state so state policy is an expression of what they want to do. The problem is dictatorship of money. If we had democracy this would not happen.I would argue though that even China is going through the same historical process. Chinese investment into Africa is exploding, even with the CPC incharge. As these investments see successful return we will see the rise of Chinese finance oligarchs to rival and eventually defeat the industrial ones. Then voila, China will be rapidly exporting it's industry to low wage workers in Africa. Who knows where we in the west will be by that time.
