Do women truly believe there are not going to be consequences for their predatory degeneracy that destroyed the current leading civilization?
Congratulations you identified yourself as an astroturfer in the first word
>>539996441There won't be any consequences, not for this generation of women at least. Maybe their grand daughters will face consequences but that isn't completely fair.
>>539996441You cannot blame them. Its the jews, and the men in their lives that permit their behavior, that deserve the blame.
>>539996632You mean like current people are paying reparations for things that happened 500-1000 years ago? lol
See, you think because women destroyed civilisation men will one day say "enough is enough" and take away their rights.But the world is controlled by a bunch of Lucifer worshipping lunatics who WILL reduce the population to 500M only God knows what happens next after they achieve that. Cyberpunk dystopia I presume.
>>539996706It's not completely fair for us whose lives were destroyed by the women of this generation. They will die of old age while their crotch spawn might pay the price
>>539996441Do not worry. Once christianity bites the dust and islam and communism takes over women would WISH they were all dead.
>>539996441Yes, because we have tards who think they should be treated like children, with a slap on the wrist. No, the consequences have to be severe enough to be remembered into the future as deterrence.
>>539996980Yes, stoned to death, beheaded or raped to death is their future
I'm assuming the demon worshipping faggots will do some massive fucking bullshit once population drops to 500M and the global fertility is below 1.5They will do some bullshit to rise it back to 2.1 perhaps even limit women's rights globally
>>539997111Well do it faster I don't want to wait until 80 to see this
>>539996980You're provably wrong.1. Chen & Shapiro (2007) -- American Law and Economics Review2. Smith, Gendreau, & Goggin (2002) -- Public Works and Government Services Canada3. Drago, Galbiati, & Vertova (2011) -- American Law and Economics Review4. Cullen, Jonson, & Nagin (2011) -- The Prison Journal
>>539996441'Twas males that granted the females rights for which the females were not evolved enough to embrace responsibly. They evolved differently. Cut them some slack.It's not as if the human male is any more decent or better than the human female. Males have been in charge since the advent of domestication and domestication corrupted the human male as much as the human female.Get better & behave better; set an example for other men as well as for women. We're not going to make it if we can't all be better.
>>539998018Simps will face consequences too.
>>539996574Why does "astroturf" appear in every thread I've seen this morning?
>>539996441most of them will be able to find a safe port within the storm they helped create. as society declines white women will settle down with a caretaker and they will experience little to no consequence
>>539998657>t. newfag
>>539996441>women >consequences They can’t even compute such a thing. They can’t picture hypotheticals or future paths in their minds. That’s not a an edgy meme, they really can’t. They never had rights for 99% of human history for a reason.
>>539996441My pet theory is that progressive feminist women want to destroy western society and go back to tribal patriarchal living and basically start over, minus racism
>>539996441Men are slaves for women and will throw themselves into the meat grinder the second women demand it. The government will castrate every male at birth before it limits the freedoms of women.
>>539996441Women and homosexuals dont care, they will pursue their sex drives ad infinitum
>>539998713>retarded little monkey living in a hellholeweird that you care about this conversation. its not like you have society worth defending down there
>>539996650Faggot simp/roastie detected
>>539996441>consequencesThere literally wont be, not for them. Ok, let’s say society goes down the drain or there’s a period of mass violence in some government overthrow. The one’s dying and paying those costs will still be majority male. At worst more women will be a little more dependent on a man, so they’ll just grab onto a dick. In the end it’s very difficult to actually kill a female and a black or brown baby is still half her dna, so she still proceeds jnto the future. Sorry. Society is for men. Women don’t need it. The change of men in a society is like electing a new politician.
>>539996441/pol/ doesn't hate w*men enough
>>539999768Is every Irish flag on here a jew or foid nowadays? The 70IQ posts have the unmistakable self confidence while being completely wrong about everything
>>539996632lol. lmao evenWhat do you think European countries will look like in 10-15 years, nigger? Germany is already shitskin central
>>539997390>You're provably wrong.>1. Chen & Shapiro (2007) -- American Law and Economics Review>2. Smith, Gendreau, & Goggin (2002) -- Public Works and Government Services Canada>3. Drago, Galbiati, & Vertova (2011) -- American Law and Economics Review>4. Cullen, Jonson, & Nagin (2011) -- The Prison JournalQrd on these?
>>539998441Something to do with that stupid troy moive.
STOP WATCHING PORN YOU STUPID KEK
I can't wait for this gay faggot society to collapse into total anarchy so I can become a cannibal warlord and raider. I shall take all white women as my sex slaves and kill everyone else and make stew out of their meat. My harem of fat whores will be well fed on the meat of weak faggots that me and my biker gang murder.
>>539996441civilization is a jewish scam running on worthless fiatretvrn to steppe migrants slaughtering each other
>>540001518What's he wrong about? Women have zero loyalty.
>>540002222He's retarded if he thinks women won't be the biggest losers in a societal breakdown, making it sound like they just calmly wait in a lobby for the transition of power
>>540001899If Germany is already shitskin central women don't have rights in Germany? They can't get jobs? They are sold into marriage?
>>540003471Indeed, they don't understand that their way of living is a thing that can disappear. Women are even more oblivious to this, they are willing to be the welfare center of the world but expect the area around them to be a nice white neighbourhood without these two things having any contradiction between them.
>>540003366they get to go back to being rape meat, like they really want to be deep down, so it works out just fine for them
>>539996441IDK depends on where you are I guess. Canadian woman must have thought this but now everything is ruined by jeets and they're just bitching and complaining about it. Everything is unsafe/expensive/poor quality/ecoli and they "don't feels safe" everywhere they go. It's really quite funny probably the only positive thing about the invasion. I tell chicks I know I still hike/walk/go out at night and they seethe at me cause they're scared of a jeet raping them or something lol>Must be nice>Wow lucky you're a man>I cant do that>Aren't you scared?
>>539996441Stop acting as if literally every woman is the most left-wing Jewish Feminist out there, that is literally what the (((media))) wants you to believe.
they'll someday regret how they treated us. they will rue the day they laughed at us
>>539999343True, the lives of women and girls are taken to be worth ad infinitum. A single girl is seen as more valuable than literally every male on the planet, but this isn't male nature, it is Jewish and Arab nature. We should simply depopulate Africa and Western Asia and colonise it with Europeans and Asians.
>>540003869Uh we have voting stats to go by. Theyre not gonna fuck you bro
>>539996441FOIDSLOP THREAD
>Another le woman thread with reply bots to cover up the massive kike operation failure >Janitors will not do anything about it
>>539996441I love White women, stupid and self-harming though they are. But don't make much of their agency or actions. With the vote, women are the original "turtle on a fence post."Only a White man and a White woman can create White children.
>>539996650Nah faggot. They had full rights, thus they have full responsibility.
