Why is human biodiversity not accepted by scientists?
There isn't a bone at the point of the nose, the kenyan dude is right...
>>539998633I'd put a bone in her nose, if you know what I mean
>>539999184No, I don't know what you mean.
>>539998633She probably got BBC'd that night
>>539999351I would put my bone (penis) inside her nose (ear)
"It's.....(furrows wizened brow)....genetic."
>>539999596Fuck I thought I was the only one to dream about fucking a girl's ear and I was always ashamed to admit it. Glad to hear I'm not fucked up, thanks Nigel
>>539999184I'm not understanding what you're getting at
>>539999385jokes aside you're not wrong on this one, he's actually her boyfriend,really blackpilling
>>539998633because a terrible eugenics human breeding program is underway through flooding non-Whites into White nations to create a brown-mutt servant class, without any natural claim to heritage, history or home. And racial egalitarianism serve Private Central Banking oligarchy, because a non-White or a mixed person may not be able to steward national legacy or raise a family with a racial identity that spans generations, but they can get credit card debt, undercut labor markets and coomsoom product.
>>539998633Incidentally soft science people like sociologists etc claim to speak for all of science as if it is a unified bloc when no, really only biologists can truly represent and own this question, specifically geneticists and anthropologists. And they know we have notable differences actually, and it is folly to compare how similar the genome itself is percent wise when we are almost 99% identical to chimpanzees. Humans can be as much as 0.4% divergent… dog breeds are only 0.1% apart max yet nobody contests that physically, intellectually and behaviorally, dogs can be quite different. Yet they claim this just doesn’t apply to humans for reasons. A baby biter pit bull is closer genetically to the sweetest retriever in existence than you are to many other ethnicities. Percent homology does not dictate epigenome, proteome etc. Objectively the “we’re all the same” shit is very easily disproven but biologists tend to really want to avoid saying this flat out unless they are fresh out of fucks to give and fine with their career ending, like James Watson. Can’t say shit when your career is held hostage to prop up the lie just to keep the peace. Non-biologists cannot claim to know the facts better than the real deal, but the real deal is also silenced and self censored for life generally. Because they are either afraid to own the truth or deem that the world is not mature enough to be told the truth and not use it to weaponize and discriminate. IMO it should not be a world breaking truth, just accepted as basic fact but should not be used to justify judging whole groups (just judge individuals). But I guess I am a tiny minority.People in pharma and medicine also deal with the fact different ethnicities have different responses to medication and can’t claim black people respond less to blood pressure medicine because muh racism. They just fucking naturally don’t respond well and medicines weren’t at all designed to target one race over another.
>>539998633I have a bone in my dick
>>540001699i have a bone to pick
