Eugenics created transgenderism as a clinical condition

>>540056515
>communism but for the human genome

>>540056515
The vast, vast majority of people are fanatically in favour of eugenics. They just have a problem with a scientific approach to the process.

>>540056515
if everyone is born perfect in the next generation, that would make imperfect you a complete loser

>>540056515
It's something leftoids and christcucks can both unite against.

>>540056515
the weak fear the strong

>>540056515
It goes against the narrative while also having plenty of examples of being true.
People are also naturally opposed to fate, things they can't change. They hate having to admit they may have been dealt a worse hand than someone else.

Again this stops really mattering once designer babies come around. If we don't do it China will.

Earlier attempts to keep bloodlines pure and noble resulted in a lot of supposedly important people being born hemophiliacs.
You might say that genetics is perfected now and that such a thing could never happen again but I'm not so optimistic, especially not if politicians are in charge of the process.

>>540056673
>keep bloodlines pure

That's not what eugenics is.

>>540056515
Eugenics was an idea deliberately tainted by the (((Nazi psyop))) to set back European people

>>540056737
The intent is the same; to produce better people through controlled breeding.

>>540056515
>>540056596
Ngubu here >>540056605 is correct. However, eugenics now means abandoning traditional evolutionary biology.
This is not tomorrow, this is happening right now in thousands of startups and commie gulags, whatever they call them.
They are working towards designer organisms that drop all the evolutionary garbage for task specific, optimized systems.
Your children would have to compete against designer biorobots and systems of all scales, bacteria to living ships and cities.
Which they can't, so they will die from some random infection in a generally exhausting and poisonous biosphere.

I am not joking, this is not a shitpost, this is all real, just hidden behind seven layers of lies and euphemist language.
Not many are planning for this outcome specifically, but it is the natural outcome of what they are doing.

>>540056515
basically all politics is eugenics in one form or another.

However the sterelizing type of eugenics people generally tend to have a quite twisted view of what humanity is and what we should strive for as a organism.

>>540056515
For stupid reasons mostly. Eugenics sounds like a good idea on paper but when you really think about it what traits should we even be selecting for?

You can select all the traits that would make a human more agreeable, civilized, docile and obedient. But if you make everyone this way, civilization would collapse.

Humanity does not know enough about itself to select the right traits to filter out, and humanity has stagnated the natural course of evolution for itself. We have absolutely no clue what traits we should even be selecting for.

I think throwing humans into a gladiator pit is a good strategy.

>>540056515
Because they are morons?!

>>540056871
You're a moron too.

File: 1697393851053463.jpg (8 KB, 236x236)

8 KB JPG

>>540056801
eugenics originated in USA because white suddenly started living beside other races unlike in Europe
It was self evident so they started researching it, then it went across ocean to Europe first to Britain then to Germany and France

>>540056515
You'll find it's only the most disgenic freaks that are against it. Because surprise surprise, they're advocating for their own interests selfishly and don't want their genetic line to end, even if it pollutes the genepool. Which in itself is an argument for eugenics.

The people against it portray it as cartoonishly evil for a reason. They fear that if some version of it ever catches on, that's it for them and their descendants.

It could be done softly too. Abolish the welfare state that's causing the dumbest and laziest to breed. Have something like a one child policy for people who are stupid, poor or have serious health issues. If people want to have beyond say 2 children, they should have to pay and pay more money each time. So then it cuts out the retards that breed like rabbits and pollute the genepool.

There are also many other sensible reasons for doing this, you never want a population explosion of lesser humans like jeets or niggers. These are not able to stand on their own two feet, they are propped up by others growing their food for them, giving them advanced technology and so on. In these cases, something like family planning and giving their women an injection that makes them infertile for at least several years, helps humanity as a whole. Humanity doesn't need some Dalit woman that shits in a field, shitting out 5 children that are all going to grow up in poverty and pollute the planet and contribute nothing. We don't need more scammers or more people with the smallest brains. A good gardener knows to prune.

>>540056515
>Why do people have such a bug up their ass about eugenics?
It deprives christcucks and other superstitious junk consoomers from their main recruitment demography: genetic dead ends.

>>540056591
>eugenics
Poisoning a poisoned bloodline with more foreign poison is known as "dysgenics." There is nothing eugenic about molesting and trooning the sons for whom you have arranged marriage.

>>540057132

Havelock Ellis ran the eugenics society, he created transgenderism as a clinical term.

You could argue that it’s sterilisation through castration.

UBI would unironically stop people breeding in order to game the welfare state.

>>540056515
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZZVzt3mwlc&t=891s

>>540056515
This is pretty much why we don't do eugenics.

Man:
> Let us increase the quality of genes so that it is beneficial as to reduce the suffering of our organism
The women said
> No we have to care for all these dysgenic and allow them to multiply and reproduce.
> Just like my Chihuahua that I like to care for and feed and change its nappy.
Man:
> But you will have a society filled with dysgenic people that suffer as a result of not being able to compete in our complex world.
Women
> Oh no, I don't want to breed with any of them, but I like the fact that all these dysgenic find me attractive and I get attention from them
Later
> oh no, help I am being raped.
Man
> You literally voted for it.

Also Jews don't like the sound of it because it historically target them and so they get all fidgety when they hear about it.
Never mind that we were all proved right.

>>540056515
did you ever heard pedophile jewish richrats talk about having bigger populations? i mean the concept of overpopulation decrease is older than the jew himself..

i mean did you ever noticed that no jew touches the topic of eugenics in nazi germany? if they would do so they know where the trace leads to...

>>540056515
Crab bucket mentality

>>540056515
Because humans, especially westerners are shit at determining which traits are desirable
Reminder that China was considered inferior racially just 30 years ago. Western racialists are morons, simple as.

>>540056515

It's pretentious and Jewish, Leaf flag Anon

Those that advocate it are usually of low value just like their "muh humanity" is of low value

Having personal standards makes sense and is different

>>540056843
fine mate, now tell me how an expensive robot can somehow replace the slave races of this world that work for peanuts

Ignore the bot replies. If you want to actually discuss anything coherently - be it geopolitics, history, finance, conspiracy theories, metaphysics, the answer is getting 5-15 active people in an invite only chat isolating yourself from the group-thinking horde. Everything is upside down, if you want to have civil discourse you need to isolate yourself while every jingoist crazies loitering on the openweb and it's only going to get worse. Complaining doesn't work. Consider joining https://simplex.chat/contact/#/?v=2-7&smp=smp%3A%2F%2FLDnWZVlAUInmjmdpQQoIo6FUinRXGe0q3zi5okXDE4s%3D%40smp2.simplexonflux.com%2FCIVhXUGWZHG4pnXx3pEESitxlqerHxD8%23%2F%3Fv%3D1-4%26dh%3DMCowBQYDK2VuAyEAod4QRCupJN8e1Nh8s2pd3ub03RH44sC36QV6X3fYb3s%253D%26q%3Dc%26srv%3Dyiqtuh3q4x7hgovkomafsod52wvfjucdljqbbipg5sdssnklgongxbqd.onion&data=%7B%22groupLinkId%22%3A%2211Gn69wT4Y4vcwSIaVpBNw%3D%3D%22%7D Discord & Telegram are namefag, SX doens't require your phone number and no user identifier. Any namefags forums eventually fails out. No one really exchange convo on Twitter. It's not about the numbers. It's the sense of censorship present all the time. People are afraid to say slightly wrong things. How do you learn things without being wrong first? Everything is sanitized for Ai training. Sense of discovery gone. Raw human engagement gone. You are not observing, you are being observed. If you feel like chans are the only place left this axiom applies - strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people, then we're stuck. All chans suffer from low user count. Only generals on /poI/ go over 300 replies and they're like chat rooms for circlejerk minus it's on the open web. Chat is a a downgrade and not telling you to leave chan but I can't think of better options atm. I don't want to clog up IRC with /pol/ things. There's no systematic, programmable solution, it's the people using the internet who r at fault here https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/539447099/#539457056