>strg+f flock>no resultshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ju8rVbt05Z4Do you support the Flockening? Discuss, Americans
>>540066523next time don't use a retard title
We need to privatize everything already, we would have flock free places for the people who can afford it and flock infested ones for the niggers and other social pariah. We already have thar to some extent but only the ultra rich are safe because everything basically is 'public' property
Alprs have been around since the 80s. Your license plate literally exists so law enforcement can have a unique identifying feature a fixed to your car.
>>540066523On 4chan's politically incorrect board (/pol/), the most engaging posts are characterized by high-arousal negative emotions, meme-based formats, and content targeting racial minorities or promoting conspiracy theories.Most Engaging Moods and EmotionsPosts that incite anger, outrage, shock, and repulsion generate the highest levels of engagement and sharing. Content designed to provoke the Left, manipulate public perception, or express hostility toward out-groups receives significantly more "angry" reactions and drives extreme message propagation. Interactions between users of opposing ideologies (out-group replies) are specifically characterized by higher negativity and toxicity, which fuels further discussion.Most Engaging Content FormatsMemes: Meme-based content, particularly those featuring recognizable figures like "Pepe the Frog," shows 300% higher engagement than text-only posts. Memes combined with extremist symbols (e.g., "Blood and Soil") or Nazi imagery also demonstrate high engagement rates.Visuals: Highly viral images tend to use a close-up scale, contain characters, and evoke strong positive or negative emotions, whereas images with long text or unclear subjects are less likely to be shared.You have to study to fight the bots
>>540066523I just dont care is all. I know you shills really really want me to care about Flock cameras, but I'm just not going to do that. Yeah there's all kinds of shady practices and fearmongering about them, but I just don't care. It's just not something I'm going to learn about or engage with. Oh you have a video all about Flock cameras? That's nice, it's not for me. Have fun though.
>>540066523Why don't Americans just shoot the cameras? Did they forget they have guns?
To maximize engagement on 4chan's politically incorrect board (/pol/), content must be aggressively provocative, inflammatory, and often framed as a question or a bold, controversial statement. The platform's ephemeral nature creates a "survival of the fittest" environment where only posts that immediately spark reaction remain visible.Questions vs. StatementsProposing a question is generally more effective than making a declarative statement. Across social media, questions generate approximately 1.6 times more comments than statements because they act as natural calls-to-action. This trend holds true on /pol/, where research identifies "questions" and "directives" as the most prevalent metadiscursive markers used to stimulate negative attitudes and endorse group arguments. The presence of a reply indicator on the site further incentivizes users to post controversial content, including questions, to provoke responses and keep threads active.Most Engaging Titles and ContentProvocative and Inflammatory Language: Due to the rapid deletion of content that fails to engage, users must resort to "provoking language" and be as "inflammatory as possible" to capture attention. Titles or opening lines that offer a "bold opinion" or are highly likely to be controversial are most effective at driving engagement.
>>540069134Shock and Novelty: Since posts are deleted when they stop receiving new engagement (a process known as "bumping"), the only way to go viral or remain active is through "shock and novelty".Aggression: Aggressiveness is a primary driver of response; it is described as "what makes them respond, which is what makes you win attention". Users often seek to "one-up each other with these provocative posts," becoming increasingly reactionary to maintain visibility.Optimal Mood and ToneThe most engaging mood on /pol/ is characterized by hostility, anger, and dark humor:Hostile Humor and Ridicule: "Ridicule" is the most used type of humor, frequently targeting racial minorities. "Hostile jokes" are prevalent because they provide "aggressive catharsis" and a feeling of superiority to the community. Aggressive humor transports hate more explicitly than other forms like puns and is a staple of far-right memetic communication on the board.Sarcasm and Irony: Sarcasm is commonly used to mask hostility or dissatisfaction behind a veneer of humor, allowing users to express criticism less explicitly while still provoking a reaction.Anger: High-arousal emotions, particularly anger, drive engagement; anger was the highest-rated emotion in nearly half of analyzed political tweets, a dynamic that translates to the "war of all against all" atmosphere of 4chan.Conspiratorial and Polarizing Sentiment: Content that reinforces "formulaic suspicion," conspiracy theories, and negative perceptions of minorities, the Left, and liberals generates significant collective action and response.In summary, the most engaging post on /pol/ typically combines a provocative title or question with an aggressive, sarcastic, or ridiculing tone that targets specific groups or ideologies, thereby triggering the "reply indicator" mechanic and ensuring the thread stays bumped.
>>540069045>Why don't Americans just shoot the cameras?https://www.kare11.com/article/news/nation-world/congressional-candidate-arrested-tennessee-shooting-flock-license-plate-readers/507-00c66d31-c717-4c9a-96d9-e7cbea3737a0?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook_KARE_11
Like I meant be called a shill but I am bumping this try not to be annoyed with me but I'm trying to help you all because if you're real people which I think you are to judging by the shittiness of your actual thread realize that AI is doing a very good job >>540066523In other words, artificial intelligence can produce a thread that is ten times better than yours, which is lousy because you can't compete. Even if you could, your thread wouldn't be seen because you're not engaging. I don't mean that your topic wasn't engaging. I think flock cameras are important to talk about. But if you're German and talking about flock cameras (odd), The very least you can do is try , it is an important aspect of our entire website.also every single method used to communicate between humans on here is studied and manipulates that AI can understand it
>>540069244well boring it that's insane because it really doesn't solve the major issue here it lowers the property value that's just a joke What you're suggesting is that people commit felonies in front of a camera, which is dumb. I mean, how do they know the camera will be destroyed? What if there are multiple cameras? What if the sound of a gunshot endangers the public more than shooting at a camera? It's really stupid to suggest that. Additionally, most people don't realize that cameras run on electricity, and magnets can mess up cameras. You can probably hack these cameras. Honestly, I would be afraid if I were a politician because people could hack these cameras and see where I am.
Let me make something clear to you: these people who run the world are geriatric. We live in a period in which the majority of people running it are very old. Okay, now that we've established that, we have to consider whether they understand technology. Probably not, but they're definitely vulnerable to the same tools they use against us. For example, if Obama passed a law to spy on Americans, he could also be spied on. And, after the recent revelations, it seems to me that they have a lot more to hide than we do. I don't think we're going to have Epstein-level parties. Some of us have pretty big bashes, but we're not secretly running the planet and blackmailing each other, unless some of you are Israeli. That's just a joke for my Israeli friends.
The point is that the people currently running the world don't truly understand the fundamental tools they're using. In the cybersecurity industry, we call them "script kitties." They don't know what they're doing and are using tools they don't understand. They just want results, which is understandable in a world where you could build a railroad and then move on to the next project. However, this kind of low-information, cognitive-miser rationale is literally detrimental to all of humanity at this point.It seems normal at face value until you walk around a campus in Massachusetts, for example, and quickly realize that everyone thinks Iran is Palestine and that the Iranians are going to be happy with the Americans after they killed their president. It's a pretty big deal, and it's not going to go away. I don't know why they conflate the two. Now, I'm not arguing whether Palestine is good or bad; that's not my point. But I bring up things like this all the time, and I don't think people understand or grasp them. A fundamental and interesting aspect of all this is that Israel has been linked to the right because its people are lighter-skinned.
What I'm trying to say is that the people using these algorithms probably don't realize that they're not being run by anyone anymore. Additionally, think about this for a moment. As I've said, most of you have never been to Israel, which is obvious. I haven't been to Israel either, and I'm not Jewish, whether you believe me or not. I'm not going to sit here and care about that, but the point is, they're probably going to become a US state. I've been bringing this up to people a lot because it's what's going to happen. Hawaii and Alaska are US states, and they do a lot less for the United States than Israel. Yes, Israel does a lot for the United States. Whether they like it or not, they probably can't do everything Americans want them to do. Propaganda is pushed against them, but honestly, if Israel didn't exist in the Middle East... Well, let's just say this: Iran has much better geography for having nukes. They have giant underground bases, whereas America doesn't have that kind of geography, so they can't be as strong as Iran once they get nukes. Actually, a lot of countries can't be, which is why China isn't so happy about this. Additionally, most people misunderstand China's main doctrine. Don't take my word for it; look it up. It's essentially, "We're going to do capitalism until we can figure out communism." So, many people look at China and think, "Oh, my goodness! Why are they so capitalist?" But, they openly say, "Yes, that's our party line. We're going to outdo everyone at capitalism because we must to bring in communism."Hence, they are not going to align with Russia and Iran because Russia is holding on to the sickle and hammer.
They watched Russia collapse in 1991. They were terrified that they were not going to align with Iran and Russia, who are again following this ideological path. This is exactly what China is afraid of. They don't like that. They did this once before. They literally studied the Soviet Union for a long time.They concluded that you need to worry about the economy first and then work towards utopia because if you do the inverse, you'll just die. You have to realize that this is a big doctrine. This is what it is. You can't just ignore it. So, no, China's not going to team up with Iran and Russia. People in America who say that have no clear understanding of the doctrines. It would go against the official Communist Party line, so that's not going to happen.
What I'm trying to say is that Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin are different. They had totally different upbringings. Xi Jinping, the current president of China, literally had a father who was humiliated, tortured, and embarrassed by his own party. You would think that would make him an enemy of the party for life, but he was sent away and became loyal to the party. That's why they trust him so much. Vladimir Putin had the opposite upbringing. He grew up in the gritty streets of 1990s Russia. You need to understand the difference between the two. One is smarter than the other, but in different ways. Picture China's leader as someone with Stockholm syndrome who became the system. Putin, on the other hand, is someone who literally took over the system from outside of it.
My boomer parents support flock cameras because "they helped catch that murderer a few weeks ago"apparently allowing the government to spy on us 24/7 in every public area is perfectly okay as long as it occasionally catches 1 criminal
>>540069930Nobody is reading that nigger
Now, let's continue with this doctrine. China will never align itself with Russia, which is currently associated with the sickle and hammer, because they're making the same mistake. They're putting ideology before the economy. Russia isn't really a superpower. It's a regional great power with a nuclear arsenal. That's it. In that sense, it's no more a superpower than North Korea. I mean, it has more stuff, but it's not producing advanced technology, so that cancels out the smart part. Not that they're dumb. Russians are very intelligent. It's their own country fucking them over. I'm not saying America isn't doing the same, so fuck off with the whole "you're a spy" thing. I don't give a fuck. Everybody's screwing each other over. Guess what, guys? There isn't a single country that isn't screwing over its people. Anyway, if you look at Russia, you'll see that they probably don't love this situation but have to stick with Iran because of the Shahad thing. The drones. Ukraine is going to be attached to us because they use underwater drones in the Black Sea. The war in Ukraine is going to continue because of Odessa. Ninety percent of the world's neon came from there, and it has been sequestered by a company called Cryoin ever since. It was intended for use in semiconductors in Taiwan.
Here's what will happen in the coming months. You'll probably agree with it anyway. The United States and Israel will secretly team up. They don't need to inform Europe. Europe has made its position clear. They won't help you when they need oil. So, from America's point of view, why would they trust Europe with the nuclear doctrine in Greenland? You wouldn't. Denmark needs the oil; they won't help you with the Strait of Hormuz. If they disagree with you in any way, shape, or form, you're in nuclear danger. That's not okay. Europe is completely messed up. I want to make this clear. There are only a few places on Earth with oil: Russia, Canada, the Middle East, Texas, and Venezuela. These are really the main areas. The only cheap oil comes from the Permian Basin in Texas and Saudi Arabia, where production costs are around $6 to $8 a barrel. Then there are places like Venezuela, where it costs around $168 a barrel to produce oil because it's thick and tar-like. It's similar to Alberta, Canada, but they can only send their oil here. They only have pipelines that lead to the United States. So, even if they hate America, they can't do anything about it. America is going to prevent anyone from using Venezuelan oil. Not that it was being used anyway, as there were no facilities for it. But America is going to prevent Venezuela from building facilities. They ended that regime. Canada really can't do anything anyway.
>>540066523
>>540070074They really can't. Ultimately, whether they complain or not, they can't do anything besides trade their oil with the United States. If Israel controls the oil in the Levant area, which they are allowed to do up to Egypt, then Egypt will not help guard the strait. This allows Israel to take control, expand, and help America control the world's oil. That leaves just Russia, and I'm sure Europe isn't eager to beg them for oil.
>>540066523Im waiting for assmongol to watch it and upload to jewtube
>>540070008Calling me a nigger while insulting people for reading is insane.
The world redrew battle lines and they definitely excluded dinky Europe because who the fuck knows what the hell's going on thereAnd by the way if anybody wants to insult Russia for being just a greater regional power, you have no idea I don't even know what to call European nations
>>540066523>does everything Flock cameras do AND goyim willingly install them on their front doorslmao
>>540066523I support flock because these retarded anarchists and libtards don't want to address the real problem of there being too much catch and release bullshit in the judicial system, so if they don't want to address the real problem then we're going to have to beat around the bush some in order to get criminals off the street.If there was no catch and release bullshit then we would have no need to implement flock systems, and once that problem is fixed then I'd be 100% for getting rid of flock cameras.
staged
>>540072759Yeah, how could anyone be against mass government surveillance? Must be staged false flags.
You absolutely should not buy a portable bandsaw for your workshop. Nobody needs a portable bandsaw.