Would it help India's holy Ganga?https://www.economist.com/china/2026/07/27/chinas-mightiest-river-is-coming-back-from-the-brink
>>540069356>economist.com>big words headlineDidnt readBuy an ad
>>540069356only thing that will help India is less Indians
>>540069356China does not give a shit about it's environment.
>>540069763When was the last time you visited Chyna?You still have to drink bottled water like a 4th world nigger, don't you?
>>540069763>China does not give a shit about it's environment.depends on the area and populationthe NE they care less because lower pop density and more mining.
>>540069356BUTATWHATCOST
>>540069356The only thing that could clean the Ganges is the complete and total genocide of all hindu scum.
the only way civilizations make it to scale 2 is ecofascism and no monetary system at all
>>540069356Anti China propaganda is ridiculous
>>540069763Wrong, it does care but not in a normal way. They only care about the environment in so much as it might influence their external face and reputation. Same deal as Pandas. They only care about saving the pandas because they see them as popular symbols that represent them and do so to save face.
