Most of the problems plaguing civilization (violence, rape, etc.) are caused by an excess number of males. If we were to annihilate most of them (while allowing the top 20-30% to govern the females), then most of those problems would be solved or reduced. I suppose we could also cull 10-20% of females, but that wouldn't accomplish as much. From a eugenicist perspective, I can't see anything wrong with this.
>>540076525I totally disagree. I think there are actually too many women.If we got rid of all the ugly women then men would not be half as stressed
>>540076525Consider that from a eugenic perspective men have been subject to stronger selection pressure than women for millions of years. Which means women drag the genome down. We can remedy this. Any woman that shaves or has too much body hair can be slaughtered.
>>540076525>shoulduseless thread.
>>540076525Low-key the elites are doing it with social engineering as something like 50% of our generation won't reproduce
>>540076525>Most of the problems plaguing civilization>violence, rapeSilly me, i thought it was the knock-on effects of financialization
>>540076525If you think that modern society is too violent then you are a woman or a throughly emasculated man.
>>540076525Women are already culling males, manlet, you won't reproduce, ever
>>540078218No, violence can be useful in some contexts. The problem is that most violence nowadays is anti-social and nihilistic (like killing women because you can't find romantic or sexual success).
The future will be genderless once babies are born in a lab. Full control
Why does it have to be men or women? An excess of either is bad for society. There are just too many people. Mutational load is far too high, huge swathes of the population are just useless biomass begging for handouts, and that's White people. If the ruling class was genuinely making kill-shots to cull the most obsequious people I would support them.
>>540076525Women are the driving force for violence trough their selection bias.
>>540076525George Bernard Shaw made this observation
>>540078411No, most violemce is under/non-reported shitskin murder spress and arson/theft. You can't even engage actual reality properly, what makes you think you have any useful opinions? Retard.
>>540076525You're a retard, objectively speaking. In your retarded daydream, the top 20-30% somehow rule over women and also do all the things required to run society. You know, not just the things when you sit in an office imagining how things are run in your imagination but actually running them in reality. You definitely belong in the 70-80% that would be culled in your very own utopia because there is absolutely no use purpose for a retard like you.
>>540076525>>/r9k/