[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Sir Evelyn De Rothschid.png (1.02 MB, 694x1144)
1.02 MB PNG
“I think hedge funds are an absolute disgrace to modern finance. They have never done anything for the community. They have only done It for self indulging and making a lot of money. Hedge funds should have been licensed. What is the difference between a hedge fund and a man brokering in the corner of his office in a bank. Personally I dont see much difference. Even bookies on a race track are licensed. In my opinion a hedge fund is not much better than a bookie on a race track."

>Bankers are not the highest form of ethical behavior, im not saying im against banking but I think they have to be taught.

>The one thing ill say which in relation to this country (USA) you have a much bigger problem which is to do with ethics, but of a different sort. You have trespassed into the electoral system by allowing people to pay billions of dollars to become president of the United States or to become elected for your congress. We (UK) have very strict rules. I think that for the younger generation and for future generations is one of the most dangerous things that has happened to America because I would say maybe 80% of people of honest but you only need to have that huge sum of money being spread around to gain political advantage being used unethically. And I am very sad to think, because we love this country and we know what a great country it is, that no-one stands up to change this or control it. I think if you dont set an example of ethics at the top, how to expect the people at the bottom to behave correctly.”

- Sir Evelyn Robert De Rothschild 2013 Ethics and Globalization conference (starting at 36:30)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi87oXWyd6s


Prove him wrong, go ahead ill wait....
>>
>>540082428
He's right of course, what's wrong is it coming out of the mouth of the most power hungry and unscrupulous family in the history of mankind
>>
File: rothschildepstein.png (24 KB, 1066x211)
24 KB PNG
>>540082428
>talks about disgrace
>a fucking rothschild
>>
>>540082714
The real world is not black and white anon
>>
>>540082428
looks like chevy chase in the thumbnail.
>>
He had an uncle who died fighting in WW1 for the UK. He also had another uncle who started the largest anti-zionist jewish group in the UK League of British Jews who protested against the Balfour Declaration and the creation of Israel. Even the Rothschild family in the UK is not one faction but multiple factions, let alone the other Rothschilds in Europe.
>>
>moans about hedge funds
>his wealth came from his family hedging loans across war participants
Kek.
>>
>>540083338
kek yea i thought the same, maybe the world really is all a stage with the same small circle of actors playing different roles at times.
>>
Its always the government needs to regulate how people are allowed to spend their money but its never the government needs to establish a stable currency that bankers cant just generate trillions of our of thin air
>>
>>540083397
It's called a hedge dumbass, and btw the LBJ wasn't even anti-zionist, they supported jews settling in Palestine, they just aimed to secure their own position as 'British' first and jews second
>the Rothschild family in the UK is not one faction
lmao, gtfo
>>
> "I think if you dont set an example of ethics at the top, how to expect the people at the bottom to behave correctly.”

This should be plastered on the front of the white house.
>>
>>540082428
What's his stance on circumcision, shill?
>>
>>540084003
>lmao, gtfo
The falling out between Evelyn de Rothschild and his cousin Jacob Rothschild (later 4th Lord Rothschild) stemmed from fundamental disagreements over the future direction of the family bank, NM Rothschild & Sons, and the use of the family name.

Divergent Visions for the Bank The core conflict arose in the 1970s as the financial landscape shifted. Evelyn de Rothschild, who became chairman in 1976, believed in maintaining the bank’s traditional, discreet, and family-controlled identity, acting primarily as a high-level adviser to governments and blue-chip companies. He opposed deregulation and mergers that would dilute family control. In contrast, Jacob Rothschild viewed traditional merchant banking as having little future and advocated for a more aggressive, adventurous approach, proposing mergers with rival firms like SG Warburg to create a broader financial services group.

Control and the Family Name The tension was exacerbated by a struggle for leadership and the right to use the prestigious Rothschild name. Jacob Rothschild was seen as more entrepreneurial and risk-tolerant, while Evelyn de Rothschild was regarded by the board as the "safer pair of hands" despite Jacob’s significant contributions to areas like corporate finance and the Rothschild Investment Trust (RIT). When Evelyn secured the chairmanship, Jacob felt marginalized. The dispute became so severe that in 1980, Jacob Rothschild resigned as a director, sold his stake in the bank, and took the RIT with him, effectively ending his direct role in the London bank. The rift was described by contemporary observers as "the most notorious bank-family split in City of London history."
>>
>>540082428
>hedge funds
Only do what they do and behave so, because of the post-1970s Financialized global economy <----that is enabled by infinite QE i.e. backstopping never-can-fail their entire investment bank black box gigacasino, from central banks.

>government - political leadership
The governments—all 160 of them globally—are controlled and run by central banks.
Nothing to do with ethics except those of the central bankers.

former U.K. prime minister explains what-who controls and runs their nation (no, it is not the government or monarchy):
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/522930520
>>
>>540082428
>Prove him wrong, go ahead ill wait....
how does his investment strategy differ from that of a hedge fund
>>
>>540084305
I didnt say he was right about everything, im personally against the practice and want reparations for my personal experience with infant genital mutilation.
>>
evelyn is a girls name
>>
>>540082428
So he wants a regulatory apparatus so he can make them kiss his ring.
>>
>>540084500
It used to be primarily a boys name in the Norman (chads) days
>>
>>540082428
>point to British politicians as "more honest" :)
Say what?
>>
>>
Love Big Ev
>>
>>540083338
>>540083433
OK this just got weirder, im too deep in the rabbit hole but Evelyn Rothschild's uncle Nathan de Rothschild is Pedro Pascal
>>
>>540082428
>the ethical jew
wew lad



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.