DIVORCE RATES SOARING IN EUROPETOTAL EUROMALE DIVORCE-RAPEWHY ARE WOMEN LIKE THIS??!??
>DIVORCE IS A GOOD THING>PEOPLE AREN'T STUCK IN UNHAPPY MARRIAGES ANYMORE>DIVORCE IS FEMINIST
Gee I wonder why Euro birth rates are apocalyptic. Every single culture that brutally oppresses their women has a healthy birth rate, there is a lesson in that.
Im a secondary citizen in my own country, I have no saying in this matter. I don't care about going out in style. If I did I would lose my hedonistic treadmill, so that frogs on the internet may laugh at my corpse until another psyop drops the next day.
>>540142258YOU KEEP FAILINGTO STATE HOW ITSSOLELY AND ONLYITS JUST WHITE MALE DIVORCE
>>540142327>>DIVORCE IS FEMINISTI suppose it is, but aren’t most men unhappy in their marriage? The stereotypes of the miserable husband didn’t write themselves. Marriage was always a cage for man. By having a wife and kids you are less likely to act up because you got kids to feed. So naturally a husband is preferred for any sane company and nation because a husband is docile for the most part
>>540142258Based men
>>540142258Society has lost sight of the reality that marriage is mainly for creating a stable family. If there are no stable families, society falls apart due factors like low birthrates and social problems caused by unstable families. I won't be around to see any of it, but if low birthrates continue, women's emancipation will be a short-lived historical anomaly. Women are literally sabotaging women's future by not having stable marriages and families with men who support women's rights and liberties. The women of the future will absolutely hate the generations of women who had it all and threw it all away because those women of the future won't understand either that it just seems to be the female nature. Women will never have enough awareness of their own tendencies not to destroy themselves and societies if enabled to do it.
I sort of hope White men don't marry, knock up their White gfs, have the gfs go on welfare, and bankrupt the whole system until they change it.
>>540143928Men are never satisfied either. Just look the history of war. Only assured mutual total destruction was able to somewhat hinder men from murdering everything for never ending lust for glory. It’s in human nature to never be satisfied.
>>540142327>woman>happypick one retard.
>>540142258Based.
>>540144244But if men's rights and liberties were limited like women's in the past, we wouldn't have a society at all. It wouldn't be feasible for a lot of men to be stay-at-home fathers like women in the past as men would need a wife for that purpose. It's an impossibility because it's an inversion of the natural order. It fails on day one.Women with lesser rights in the past were "kept" by men, which enabled societies to be built. Rightless men would not be "kept" by women so limiting men's rights and liberties could never lead to a stabilization and preservation of society unlike the limitation of women's rights and liberties. (This thought experiment doesn't even take into account the inevitable that men would break their chains with violence.)Human nature is a mess for sure, but there is a pretty significant difference between the sexes in terms of building and maintaining societies. Women's rights and liberties seem incompatible with this project. Which is why the most likely thing to happen is that liberal Western societies are replaced by more repressive societies that limit women's rights and liberties by law. Western people won't do it which is why there will be only enclaves of Westerners left living in essentially non-Western societies in the future.
>>540144050The men will just never be able to own anything because of crippling de facto union alimony.
Not our problem.Deal with the problems or suffer the consequences.I know our dictators don't care so why should we?
>>540143928Don't fool yourself. Women in the future will write it as men being responsible for regressing into oppression so they can jump back in equal rights and proceed to fuck it all over again. These dynamics aren't new, I suspect if much of the old records from ancient civilizations still existed we'd see a similar pathway in how all of it collapsed. There's a reason men was ousted from the Garden of Eden by a woman's actions and I think that's a serves as a very primordial cautionary tale of woman's nature.
Satan
>>540142258All too easy in an age where you can download an app and order nsa sex within 15 minutes, either accept the open marriage meme or fuck married wives your choice /pol/
>>540142258>And miss out on all the BBC?
modern women leave their husband the moment they see his is becoming frail or sickKEK
>>540142258It’s unironically because men are all porn addicts and women have had enough.
>>540146495Women are just as bad with the porn the problem is the two sides' interests aren't converging
>>540142258Women marry their employer and government now. Men are just a resource to be used and abused
>>540145152Men’s rights are liberties are limited like women’s in the past. Both men and women had different social contracts with their pros and cons. The idea that women were oppressed because men could work a shitty wage job while they got to be comfy at home is the most retarded thing ever
>>540146791An employer/the government is a much more stable provider than a lone male. Modern men are completely unstable and unreliable. It’s unironically safer to bank on your boss than some porn addicted loser.
>>540142258Good. There are zero benefits to being in a relationship with a woman nowadays. All the positive stuff lies in being single.>no nagging>no heartbreak>no STDs>no humiliation rituals>total freedom>saving money>no random dates>have your own schedule>no "tests"You can’t prove me wrong. Have some self-respect, anons.
>>540145552The historical precedents are certainly there. I just thought that having a lot more recorded history about what happened would make it different after this era. I probably made a mistake in thinking the women of the future would have access to a lot of information about the female emancipation era. Most likely a lot of it won't be available at all. The men (and some women) of the future will see it as preferable to provide women with a selective history of what happened and why limiting of women's freedoms and liberties was necessary. Since it's going to be a simplification, women will be justified in thinking it's biased so they will repeat the historical pattern.I'm starting to think more and more that we live an anomalous period in history and that the future will look nothing like what the average person expects today. The liberal European civilization is not going to survive because it undermines itself at the most fundamental levels. "Welcoming" outsiders into it is just going to delay the inevitable a little bit. It's a slow-moving suicide. I just wonder how the limiting of women's rights and liberties happens in practice. I don't think it's going to be through shariah. It will be under the guise of something else like "protection" and then over time the limitations gradually increase.What women today really don't understand: there will no men to enforce women's rights and liberties if women undermine the demographics that presently enforce them. If women ever wake up to this, it will be way too late.
>>540142258I'm just not a fan of cuckoldry and wageslavery. I don't know; maybe I'm just weird.
>>540147014>You can’t prove me wrongOh yeah? Let's see the counterpoints>nagging from family over lack of grandkids>no, but scowls from strangers at the sight of a single man in his 30s unburdened by responsibility>public toilets >paying taxes>paying taxes>paying taxes>ok fine>insomnia will destroy you>every day is a test on the willingness to live unless your a downieAll in all, having a wife is the best option.
>>540146997>An employer/the government is a much more stable provider than a lone male.... until it isn't. Because this is an artificial situation that has existed only for a very short period of time historically. The day will come when there is no employer and no government able to provide for most women. Those two are often connected too, the employer provider and the government provider. It is a big mistake to assume this situation is normal in the longer term or even self-evidently possible in all human societies. It is abnormal and not a basic feature of human life that can be taken for granted.
>>540147773>>nagging from family over lack of grandkidsWhat, once a day at worst? What a shitty little drawback.>>no, but scowls from strangers at the sight of a single man in his 30s unburdened by responsibilityYet another benefit.>public toiletsYou mean hoes? That's your wife too, at least before you married her.>paying taxesSomething married men do much more, especially if they're debtmaxxing, which they generally are. You don't need a family home as a basement dweller.>insomniaWhat?Anyway, yet another failed persuasion attempt by ringoids.
one wonders how many of you protectors of traditional values would be willing to be stuck for life with a cunt wife.
>>540147782Who produces the food? A minuscule minority. Who produces the wares? Some Chinaman at the far end of the globe. Who maintains infrastructure? Well that's about the only thing men are still critical for. The only argument against the state of things is the one you opened with: it might not last very long in historic terms.
>>5401422581 divorce every 7 minutes here.
>>540143928>Women are literally sabotaging women's futureYou really think these creatures have any foresight whatsoever? They only care about what benefits them right now, nothing else matters to them. Women would happily subject all future women to slavery if they get to live like degenerate queens for 50 years.
>>540148394There's still room for improvement.
>>540143928>Women learning >Not doubling down and blaming men moreThat's too optimistic
>>540148458>Women would happily subject all future women to slavery if they get to live like degenerate queens for 50 years.I couldn't say it better
>>540142327Will they say the same without the cash prizes?
>>540148394Divorce is the ultimate pickpocket when you think about it
