How far does wealth inequality go until the entire economy just grinds to a halt?It cannot increase forever. Eventually just one person will own everything and have all the wealth while everyone else has nothing. Can't get any more unequal than that. But i think the system will collapse long before that.
>cannot increase foreverI know from your memeflag that this is an unreasonable request, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt and ask it: do you do have any math which would support your claim?
Not a source or anything. Its just math. You asked a math question; did you try doing math first?
It's still not too late. You could google "approaches zero" or something and get it done
>>540147231Collapse is approaching in the next couple decades. Why do you think billionaires are building massive bunkers underground?
>>540147231I dunno.The commies literally took every once of wealth from the people and gave it too themselves until it imploded.So i guess until then?
>>540148174So you're saying it can increase forever? I'd say the burden of proof is on you, given that we know there is a finite amount of resources, the idea of someone owning more stuff forever is patently retarded
>>540149958Commies have to maintain the system to maintain the grift. The elite gigawealth class can just move in to pillage and then return to their enclaves. It's the Nordic model, if you will permit the joke.
It can totally increase forever if you can get people to accept that they deserve nothing
The end goal is a paid subscription service to your own eyeballs
>>540147231Woah. That graph is fucking old. Now do the graph where it shows your networth against the rest of the world. >protip>its the same graph
>>540150130They have wealth, power and luxuries beyond our wildest dreams they are above and beyond any laws no vice is out of thier reach, and yet they are just miserable bastards. I guess in the end they are just spoiled fucks that want the world as miserable as they are. Its crazy when you kinda stop and think about it.
>>540147231The dysfunction is not due to inequality desu.But people want gibs so there's no point in explaining.It can go far further without being a negative on its own. But the other problems remain, so even if you had perfect equal distribution, nothing particularly good would happen
>>540150826>wealth and luxuriesBrown fingers typed this post. You do not need, nor would benefit from, jewelry, sports cars, high-end collectibles, caviar, or anything else (((influencers))) tell you that you need. Power is a different story, but wealth and luxury is only something goycattle lust after.
