Supposedly it did happen and it's 271kWouldn't that just be a massacre?
>>540185257Sure but allies did it by bombing supply lines. Woopsie!
You are right. It was massacre, and Christians were also targeted despite what the Jewgle AI might tell you.
>>540185257One is general and the other is very specific retard
>>540185257A lawyer made one of them up
>>540185257the amount doesn't matter. its the method that does.
The holocaust happened. It was a genocide because german jews who werent killed were expelled. It just wasn’t six million. If americans killed or expelled half their japanese diaspora and only failed to hit 100% because of international intervention, would you call that a genocide? Even if the japs later lied and dramatized it?A massacre would be palestine. An overreaction to the aggression of muslim conquerors who already lost like five wars and constantly refused to take generous peace deals because it was more fun to fire mortars at shopping malls, hide munitions under schools, and station snipers in hospitals. Remember folks, muslims and arabs are not native to the levant. Its conquered territory. They just lost it to another group that’s as native as they ever were (arguably more native since the tanakh and talmud predate - and created - islam)
>>540185257A massacre is a tactic, a genocide is a strategy. It’s that simple.
>>540185921What if a war broke out and your enemy just happened to be so bad that more than half of their population is wiped out I'm talking about Armenian genocide/massacre
>>540186139Jews were put in camps just like the Japanese were put in camps. Which is what you do with potential enemies during war time.
>>540185257scale mostly
>>540186229While listening to a radio broadcast by Winston Churchill in 1941 describing the invasion of the Soviet Union and ongoing massacres lawyer Raphael Lemkin heard Churchill refer to it as "a crime with no name" and endeavored to create one for it. Although he waited an additional 3 years to do so in "Axis rule in occupied Europe." Lemkin referred to it as any "system that seeks to increase white birthrates while destroying local culture".
>>540185257too many peoplebillions must dieespecially poopjeets and chinks
>>540186699That’s consistent with my definition. A prolonged series of massacres (as tactics) are part of a broader strategy of genocide. Look at Gaza for a more recent example.
>>540185257i don't care what you call it, those louses were ruining germany and needed to be taken care of
>>540186954the problem is letting a jew tell you anything about anything, especially concerning jewish international law. The word is obviously tainted
>>540187066I agree to some extent, it’s a neologism for what people have been doing to other groups through warfare forever. Modern humans genocided Neanderthals, Europeans genocided feather Indians, etc., etc., etc., the trick is to leave no one behind to complain.
>>540187293Yes "white birthrates" is genocide, huh, that sounds weird
>>540185768“The jewish faith”.What a fucking joke. The kike “religion” is an ethnic supremacist cult. It’s not a religion.
>>540187421First world women stop having kids. Maybe the Jews are ultimately behind it but women are the ones making the decision to not have kids. They have the same issue in yellow countries with their birth rates. You’re stretching.
>>540187581I don't know if the Zionist kikes want to dump the whole word in a vat of acid with all the communists or not
>>540185257you can massacre anything (doesn't even need to be large: "mass" in massacre isn't related to any mass, here; you can do a massacre with only one corpse), even if it's a heterogeneous group: it needs to be gruesome though, since it's eymologically related to butcher quartersbut for a genocide, it shall be applied to a certain kind only: it can also be clean, as long as it's dead
>>540188865Would euthanasia of a certain race not be a massacre if completely painless?
>>540189187basically, yeah: it'd be a genocide, thoughetymology is important, anon: because that's whence sense derives
>>540189250Well, I was confused since they're both called 大屠殺 in Chinese
>>540190303does it mean having a meal too?
>>540185257English not your first language? That's okay.A genocide is any action that alters the genetic makeup of any group by over 5%.A massacre is the killing of more than one person, usually in a very brutal manner.
>>540191241Sounds arbitrary did a Jew make it up
>>540190578Serious response It translates to "Big Butcher Kill" literally
>>540193414so kinda, thenand massacre is a pretty good literal translation, since massacre (a French word, originally, like 2/3rds of the words in English) directly comes from, and used to mean the same thing as macellum (which means butcher shop)it doesn't particularly mean a big one, though (a crime scene with just one victim can be called a massacre, if it's gruesome enough)
>>540191241>English not your first language?neither is it for youMutt is just a simpler "form" of English, for simpler "minds"same as English is just a simpler "form" of French, for simpler "minds"and to be fair, French is just a simpler "form" of Latin, for simpler "minds", I knowand massacre comes from (is) a French word (like 2/3rds of the words in English)>A massacre is the killing of more than one personnot even>usually in a very brutal manneryes, that's what massacre meansliterally, the words originally means "butcher shop", is all
>>540186435Truth nuke.
