so nazis said this is sick and degenerated. how so? looks pretty decent to me
>>540194564its a retard thingamabob
This looks pretty mind boggling to me, effects-wise that is
The nazis were right
>>540194564It isn't art because making that doesn't require talent. Any retard could make that. That's why it isn't art and it will never be art.
>Hitler destroyed WW1 veteran art works as anti-war Based. War should be seen as cool.
>>540194564Reminder the nazis put up an exhibition of "good" art and people didn't give a fuck about it because they were more drawn to the "degenerate" art
>>540194564>>540194650So nazis told me this sculpture of a hand holding a turd is a piece of crap... IDK looks like the shit to me
>>540194564It saddens me that all the actual Germans were killed in the war and all that remains are the descendants of slavic rape babies
>>540194564It's a series of failed attempts at art by someone who has failed as an artist, it is not good it is kidology.
>>540194885This sculpture actually is insanely powerful, it gives immediate feelings of sadness for all the oppression blacks have been through. Check your privilege
>>540194564because it has no artistic value therefore is not art.
>>540194831yeah the average person is trash. goyim subhumans. not a surprise
>>540195274who decides that?
>>540195378Who decides that in our current society?(((Art experts))) funded by the FBI that will try to browbeat normal people for not accepting that a banana taped to a wall or canned shit is art?
>>540195336He's lying
>>540195378i decide that its disrespectful. its mysterious and doesnt say what its supposed to depict. this is not art but disrespect, it makes you feel dumb
>>540195458so it's relative to who is in power and not something objective
>>540195378The artist is clearly portraying a vapid pile of crap as a veiled critique of the observer, you uncultured philistine.
>>540194650It's mind-bottling, sweaty. Lurk more.
art that does not feature a clear and defined subject in full splendor and dignity cannot be considered art. it is simply degeneracy.
>>540194885Is it supposed to be a turd or a black dick? They are so similar looking.
>>540194564It looks decently like what exactly?
>>540194564Why is it upside down?
>>540195864obviously it's a low-class worker oppressed by industrialists and where his heart should be there's only a big empty hole. duh
>>540195894this does make more sense to you?
>>540195590>not something objectiveIt's always been somewhat objective, at least to the extend that people can recognise something is beautiful and good, but of course everyone has different tastes. I can appreciate art from different cultures even if I have a preference for certain styles of art, what I dislike is jewish "art" that's designed to be contrarian and ugly on purpose. People objectively seek beauty, so it's always been jewish intellectuals that tried to deconstruct and pathologise that impulse to look for and create beauty.
>>540194564It's a dude bent over taking it in the ass
>>540194564Nazis were philistines that had the most plebeian take on everything. They completely destroyed the already paltry German art scene. Half of the artists left never to return, some were killed or imprisoned, the others remained discreet in poverty for the duration of the retarded regime. All esthetic life ceased. Few accepted working for the regime, starving or feeling at risk of arrest. You can count the number of enthusiasts with a modicum of talent on your fingers, probably of one hand, such as the meme directing woman that ended up producing movies glorifying Africa after doing the same with the third reich. Even the most regularly posted one, Breker, was far from convinced and only did it for the money and fame. It's sad because he's the rare good sculptor in German history, and he's remembered for the few gaudy propaganda pieces he lowered himself to which are not his best works.
>>540194564Enjoy cock in ass. Pedokraut.
>>540196748I can tell its a jew, look at the beak they gave it.
>>540195233Yeah, self induced oppression is really sad.Check your privilege checking privileges, privilege checking kneejerk reaction haver.
>>540196788>Weimar ends as it was always going to>the degenerate faggots flee or hideEmpty out the closets and hang everything you find.
>>540194564It's degenerative in that it refuses to use the best modern materials and techniques to depict something recognizable to the viewer. If art requires a long story or explanation to understand what the fuck it is, it's not art. It's called fictional oration by an idiot to lazy to write it down and too stupid to spell it right anyways for it to be literature.If you produce a sculpture no different from a pre Mesopotamian fertility idol then you have actually degenerated art by 10,000 years. Supporting that is a mental sickness.
>>540194564I would burn it. It is not beautiful, it is not meaningful, it is a waste of time, resources and attention.
>>540194564Hitler knew nothing about art thats like his whole thing
>>540197316That's literally all art including this website
>>540197231Nazi Germany had a cultural output on par with North Korea and for similar reasons. Chuddismus phillistinus try to say that was a good thing.
>>540198057You have no damn clue what you just said. Give it a think. Come back when you figure it out.
>>540197294Art is supposed advance. Like you said, this looks like something a 4 IQ neolithic caveman would have carved instead of a 20th century human being.
>>540195590It's objective when you kvetch uncle adolfs fading point is inconsistent in student works but anything is art when it's a semen covered Polaroid of your mother. You people view art through a lens of power rather than truth.
>>540197294"Judaism has only recently set about conquering the realm of the visual arts. The intellect can be bewildered and led astray by fallacies, dazzling contradictions, brazenly asserted falsehoods, and hucksterism; but the eye—one would think—cannot be deceived into seeing green people, blue trees, or violet cows. Yet the evolution of painting over the last twenty years has made even this possible. Bewildered, the viewer stands before canvases spanning many square meters—senselessly daubed with splashes of color—seeing neither human, nor tree, nor house, nor indeed anything with a recognizable form; the catalogue, however, informs him that what lies before us in paint is, perhaps, "Love on a Moonlit Night," "Ancestors of Creation," "Longing," or something of the sort. Curiously, the people standing before these works dare not burst into peals of laughter, nor give indignant expression to the outrage of their healthy senses; they harbor the superstitious belief that anything painted and exhibited must necessarily signify something; and—they do not wish to be perceived as uncultured. The regimentation of the public mind by a dishonest press has long since stifled all healthy, spontaneous thought and feeling; no one dares to trust their own judgment anymore; one must first consult the newspaper to see how one is permitted to judge such matters.”Theodor Fritsch, The Handbook of the Jewish Question (29th ed.), 1923
