[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1583044006818.jpg (53 KB, 936x560)
53 KB JPG
Now that the dust has settled, was this a fabrication all along?
>>
File: images (8).jpg (28 KB, 415x739)
28 KB JPG
TEEF!
>>
yeah but half the fun is pretending its not
>>
No, it's an objective fact of nature that women peak once they're done with puberty around 15/16.
>>
>>540209476
Nope, it's real.
t. A man
>>
>>540209476
I just think the drop after 20 should be exponential. There is no plateau between 20 and 25. They just go down a hill.
>>
>>540209476
Some of the prettiest girls in high school turned into some of the frumpiest women in their 20s. That's just the truth
>>
It's true, but neither the graph or the data to support such a graph is in the paper.

Go on. Look it up for yourself.
>>
>>540209476
the best thing this study has schon that near universities of 80 people 20 like them younger then alowed.
Plus the studie showed some odd details:
Like most of the surveyed did not had a girlfriend and/or a child, had no stable employment or had no job.
I think this over 30 year old thing is a nothing burger at best and at worse some odd snap shot in some very bad corner of the universety of the 1995.

Please do not post this again.
>>
https://www.mhamic.org/sources/halletal.htm
>>
>>540209476
If this resonates with you as a representation of your perspective on female attractiveness, you should be on a watchlist. I would also challenge "attractiveness vs. Age" to who? All men? Men under 18? This graph gives no context. I could believe this, if it were a graph of attractiveness vs. age, when polling men who are 12-14. Otherwise, I just don't believe the distribution.
>>
>>540209476
I wonder what did they mean by "pedophilic stimuli" 17 year olds in their prime? 14 year olds? 8 year olds? Some toddlercon shit?
>>
>>540213344
if i not missremember the study has 80 people paid-participate wit an avage of 30+ year old.
Like i said earlyer... they all childless, mostly unemployed and joint this to get paid. This proof nothing worth proofing.
>>
>>540209476
>>540210494
>>540209768
>>540213069
>>540213344

The sampling method was flawed which was how they got a weird number of respondents saying "under 14". Look into it. Every time someone has tried to recreate these results there's an extremely sharp drop off under 15.
>>
>>540209476
Your brain is literally wired to find pubescent girls attractive. Marrying 14 year olds was normal until like 100 years ago.
>>
>>540209476
No. It's accurate. Girls looks start fading after 14, which corresponds to the graph.
>>
>>540209476
someone post the study so we can get this debate over with ffs
>>
>>540215355
That only works if you don’t have the government and roasties cock blocking you every second which is definitely not the case now.
>>
>>540209476
No, most men would become aroused at the site of a fertile girl. We're animals after all.
>>
>>540214768
>sharp drop under 15
yeah, like we see
>>
File: 1662585363245197.webm (2.84 MB, 640x360)
2.84 MB
2.84 MB WEBM
>>
>>540218106
Actually the real reason it happens is because of biology. Women age at a faster rate than men because they start puberty at 9, whereas boys start puberty at 12. By 15-16, women they are already fully grown adult women capable of bearing children. Hence, why it's called a "teen pregnancy."
>>
File: TheWallYears.jpg (106 KB, 936x560)
106 KB JPG
>>540220633
I took the time to analyze the graph myself
>slow drop after 14
>linear drop after 18
>exponential drop after 25
Christmas Cake theory confirmed.
The Japs were right all along.
>>
>>540209476
no, people are just retarded as shit and can't read a graph.
the graph isn't about at which age women are the most attractive, but it shows the percentage of females for each age group that are perceived as attractive.
scrap all the overweight women from the sample groups and I doubt it would still look the same. there are few 13-14 yo girls who are fat, but at 20, an assload of them have already turned into fat hogs.
>>
>>540221449
fair and probably correct but the alternative interpretation is funnier
>>
>>540221449
study was done in 1995, not 2025. females were not nearly as fat as they are nowadays
>>
>>540220633
Sharp as in "instant" not as in trailing off.
>>
>>540221449
>scrap all the overweight women from the sample groups and I doubt it would still look the same.
In the word of data analysis, those girls are considered outliers because they are undesirables. No one like fat chicks except niggers.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.